Re: BLE Nitrogen


Puzdrowski, Andrzej
 

> Well, board configuration is different, different pins are used for LEDs, buttons and UART, but from BLE point of view everything should be the same, correct?

 

Can you check how you configured UART flow control on both boards you have used? Mabey this cause your troubles?

 

Andrzej

 

From: zephyr-devel-bounces@... [mailto:zephyr-devel-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Marti Bolivar
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 6:42 AM
To: Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa <vinayak.kariappa.chettimada@...>
Cc: zephyr-devel@...; Zarkhin, Gene <Gene_Zarkhin@...>
Subject: Re: [Zephyr-devel] BLE Nitrogen

 

Hi,

 

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa <vinayak.kariappa.chettimada@...> wrote:

 

Nitrogen boards are actively used in the Zephyr community, unless there is some obvious physical issues in your boards (like antennae matching network) Bluetooth functionality should be pretty straight forward. You can even try central_hr one of your board and peripheral_hr on the other and they should connect to each other on power-up. Let me know if your two boards are able to connect so using these Zephyr application.

 

FWIW, my personal experience with 1.0 Nitrogen boards has been... suboptimal. 1.1 is indeed better and usable for things like IPSP at shorter ranges, but still falls short of other boards I've tried. Gene, if you can get them replaced with 1.1s, I'd start there.

 

For comparison, see BLE Nano 2 for another small form-factor Zephyr compatible nRF52 board, which claims BLE 4.2 certification: https://github.com/redbear/nRF5x/blob/master/nRF52832/docs/Specifications.md#ble-module-mb-n2

 

Marti

Join devel@lists.zephyrproject.org to automatically receive all group messages.