Re: [RFC] Simplifying disable of Kconfig Debugging options
Saucedo Tejada, Genaro <genaro.saucedo.tejada@...>
Your proposal seems the simplest to me, the only advantage I see on the more complex one is flexibility, presets could provide settings for multiple scenarios rather than on|off.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would add your observation as a 4th alternative and submit for consideration whether all the complexity previously proposed is worth it. -----Original Message-----
From: Kalowsky, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 01:07 To: Saucedo Tejada, Genaro <genaro.saucedo.tejada(a)intel.com>; devel(a)lists.zephyrproject.org Subject: RE: [RFC] Simplifying disable of Kconfig Debugging options -----Original Message-----Out of these proposals, it's not really clear to me how any of them would be more simple than just putting the debug options you are interested in to a PRJ file, and using that to {un}set the value at compile time. Could you clarify why your proposals would work better?
|
|