On 19 Feb 2016, at 08:28, Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen(a)linux.intel.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 16:48 +0000, Joakim Eriksson wrote:
Hello!The plan is to sync it from Contiki when applicable. If you look the
I just cloned the Zephyr repository and saw that the 6LoWPAN stack
was the same as the one I am used to - e,g, the Contiki 6LoWPAN
stack. How are you planning to develop it further? Are you going to
sync it from Contiki or would you like Contiki developers to post
pull-requests to fixes also to Zephyr?
code, we needed to make lot of changes to uIP stack in order to make it
work in Zephyr. The biggest change is that the IP stack is now re-
entrant e.g., there is no global buffer for network packets. Because of
this it is not so simple to just pull changes from Contiki as manual
work needs to be done anyway.
Ok, yes - I expected that there would be quite som changes. But I guess that they
will be the same changes at each sync! I will take a look at the codebase and
see how much differences you have.
I guess if Zephyr is ported to more platforms (some of the ones we have in Contiki)
maybe that would make developers do pull requests to both OS:es.
Quick question - what size of the compiled code did you get on the IP stack when
you moved from one buffer to re-entrant / multi buffers?
Thanks, and patches are welcome!
Anyway - congratulations - it looks like an exciting project and I
will be happy contribute to it!
-- Joakim Eriksson, SICS
I will take a look and see if some of our work would be good to get in!
(we have LWM2M and other things fairly recently put into Contiki).
— Joakim Eriksson, SICS