Re: [users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: STM32F103x port
Nashif, Anas
On 09/03/2016, 16:13, "Maciek Borzecki" <maciek.borzecki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Nashif, Anas <anas.nashif(a)intel.com> wrote:Yes, the only different from what you have right now is having 1 level less. I think everything else should stay the same.Summing up, what you're basically suggesting is having a structureOn 9 Mar 2016, at 09:48, Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki(a)gmail.com> wrote:Maybe I was misunderstood in my email about the structure. I was suggesting to move the SoCs directly under soc/ and ski[ the st_stm32 level. If we are to do things the same way across architecture we would need to group all quarks under intel_quark. Anas
|
|