Re: Porting to Cortex-M0+

Nashif, Anas

See for the maintainers.


On 18/08/2016, 11:00, "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy(a)> wrote:

On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:13 -0400, Benjamin Walsh wrote:
> > > I also want to add an ARCH_ARMV6, V7 etc to handle architecture
> > > specific code. We still need the more specific CPU_CORTEX_M0PLUS,
> 3,
> > > 4, etc because each cpu has different features.
> > Sounds reasonable to me. (I'm new around here though, so don't count
> > that as anything other than a random opinion ;-)
> Sounds reasonable to me as well. I'd like to hear from the ARM
> maintainers to get their opinion too.

Which reminds me to ask... who _are_ the ARM maintainers and how do we
find out such things given that the MAINTAINERS file in the source tree
is somewhat deficient in coverage?


Join to automatically receive all group messages.