On 18/08/2016, 11:00, "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy(a)linaro.org> wrote:

On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:13 -0400, Benjamin Walsh wrote:
> > > I also want to add an ARCH_ARMV6, V7 etc to handle architecture
> > > specific code. We still need the more specific CPU_CORTEX_M0PLUS,
> 3,
> > > 4, etc because each cpu has different features.
>
> > Sounds reasonable to me. (I'm new around here though, so don't count
> > that as anything other than a random opinion ;-)
>
> Sounds reasonable to me as well. I'd like to hear from the ARM
> maintainers to get their opinion too.

Which reminds me to ask... who _are_ the ARM maintainers and how do we
find out such things given that the MAINTAINERS file in the source tree
is somewhat deficient in coverage?

--
Tixy