Re: Namespacing of Zephyr headers and API
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 10:14:48 -0600
David Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 12:44:43PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:I believe some form of symlinks was available since 2000 (junctions, orspecific proposal, I'd say it's not yet too late to move all headersInterestingly, Windows has supported symlinks for quite some time
how was it called), and in XP was quite usable already. But there's
difference between systems support and ecosystem support: would normal
copy operation in command line and GUI shells work with them? 3rd-party
shells? archivers and similar tools?
But, I agree, if we want to support Windows, we probably shouldn't useD'oh, indeed, if we just move everything consistently under zephyr/,
without further restructurings or renamings, that will work! So,
there's a pretty good migration path, and maybe we should really
consider resolving the header namespacing issue.
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog