Boie, Andrew P
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 13:27 -0700, Boie, Andrew P wrote:
NACK, for reasons below.Just to qualify this -- if you wanted to create a general purpose
kernel object type that builds on what is in ring_buffer.h, I would not
But I want the existing definition left as-is as it is intentionally
lightweight and for scenarios where you have a single producer and
single consumer you don't need extra concurrency control.