Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
Hi,toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The pre-programmed PPI are very specific to Nordic's in-house stack implementation needs. Some of them coincidentally can be re-used in Zephyr implementation.
I will try to send a PR by EOD, if its doing in few minutes. Else, assume that it’s a bit more work.
From: Carles Cufi <Carles.Cufi@nordicsemi.no>
Date: Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 12:53 PM
To: "Bøe, Sebastian" <Sebastian.Boe@nordicsemi.no>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Andrzej Głąbek <Andrzej.Glabek@nordicsemi.no>, "Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa" <email@example.com>
Subject: RE: [Zephyr-devel] BLE stack using PPI channels #ble #nrf52832
Hi Sebastian, Robert,
Sebastian, thanks for pointing out the existing issue.
Robert, would you please comment on that issue stating the needs of your application so we can evaluate how best to fix this and we can also include you in upcoming Pull Request reviews so you can make sure we've addressed it in a way compatible with your requirements?
Andrzej, Vinayak: We should revisit this as soon as possible. Is DTS an option here? I assume not since this is an nRF-specific hardware resource.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> On
> Behalf Of Sebastian Boe
> Sent: 26 September 2018 12:36
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [Zephyr-devel] BLE stack using PPI channels #ble #nrf52832
> Good question, there exists an issue that can be used for this
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> on
> behalf of firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 12:33:18 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [Zephyr-devel] BLE stack using PPI channels #ble #nrf52832
> In my application I was try to use 6 PPI channels. And I discovered that
> almost all channels is used by BLE stack.
> NRF52 chip have dedicated PPI [20:31] channels for radio. Why this
> challens was not used by BLE stack.
> Is three any posibilities to change this?
> Thanks in advance!