Re: To current Zephyr HTTP API users
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:01:42 +0200
"Jukka Rissanen" <email@example.com> wrote:
Hello,Well, I kinda was interested in this, given all my criticism of the
older API and implementation. But I'm in reservations after the TLS
zstream case, where a bunch of effort was spent to do it right, and all
that went to /dev/null.
If there are no users for existing HTTP APIs, we could alsoIMHO before we provide a replacement, we should not deprecate
The new HTTP APIs could also beI think that given that we have "in house" implementation of COAP,
LWM2M, MQTT, that it would be indeed a refreshing change to not try to
invent our own API, but try to port an existing. Well, at least to
survey the landscape trying to find one which would be suitable for our
code/RAM size requirements.
So pleaseSo, I think we should decide if it would be OK to bet on 3rd-party
lib at all, then focus a call exactly like that: Are there suggestions
of existing lib to port, satisfying our requirements (which is, again,
Myself, I think my plate is more than full for 1.14, and I already
subscribed to port another lib to Zephyr (OPC-UA). However, if we agree
on 3rd-party solution to be OK in principle, I start surveying too in
the background in the meantime.
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog