Re: To current Zephyr HTTP API users
Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Jukka,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:01:42 +0200 "Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote: Hello,Well, I kinda was interested in this, given all my criticism of the older API and implementation. But I'm in reservations after the TLS zstream case, where a bunch of effort was spent to do it right, and all that went to /dev/null. If there are no users for existing HTTP APIs, we could alsoIMHO before we provide a replacement, we should not deprecate anything. The new HTTP APIs could also beI think that given that we have "in house" implementation of COAP, LWM2M, MQTT, that it would be indeed a refreshing change to not try to invent our own API, but try to port an existing. Well, at least to survey the landscape trying to find one which would be suitable for our code/RAM size requirements. So pleaseSo, I think we should decide if it would be OK to bet on 3rd-party lib at all, then focus a call exactly like that: Are there suggestions of existing lib to port, satisfying our requirements (which is, again, being small)? Myself, I think my plate is more than full for 1.14, and I already subscribed to port another lib to Zephyr (OPC-UA). However, if we agree on 3rd-party solution to be OK in principle, I start surveying too in the background in the meantime. [] -- Best Regards, Paul Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog |
|