Re: Managing/structuring multi image/binary projects for (OTA updatable products etc)
From: Marc Reilly <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2019 5:58 PM
To: Bøe, Sebastian
Cc: Bolivar, Marti; email@example.com
Subject: Re: [Zephyr-devel] Managing/structuring multi image/binary projects for (OTA updatable products etc)
The multi-image approach in NCS will not make it's way into mainline Zephyr because
it was not accepted upstream unfortunately.
Is there some record of the rationale behind this? (eg PR #).
I'm wondering that if its rejected from mainline zephyr for reasons like 'out of scope' etc then maybe there is some existing consensus for alternative ways - or if it was due to lack of demand then maybe that can be reappraised... But that's a lot of "maybes" and "wonderings".