Re: support for multi instance zephyr in same soc

Scott Branden

Thanks Kumar - we will go with this convention for naming the target.  ie board_cpu.
It will work out as long as there are not multiple cpu's on the same board that need different zephyr builds.
At that point you would need board_cpu_n

Really "boards" directory should be renamed "targets"?

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 9:01 AM Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@...> wrote:
This has been a long standing issue.  Since these are both ARM you can get away with doing something similar to how we handle building different images for SoCs that have 2 different M-class cores.

Look at boards/arm/lpcxpresso54114 for an example

- k

> On Jan 30, 2020, at 3:17 PM, Scott Branden <sbranden@...> wrote:
> Hello,
> We are currently running zephyr on M7 and linux on A72.
> The base M7 support has been upstreamed here:
> We are now looking at running Zephyr on A72 instead of linux.
> But it doesn't look like Zephyr build system will work if we name the board name the same for each CPU ?
> Any suggestions on how to name and add support for 2 different instances of Zephyr running on the same board?
> In our case: something that might easily achieve this is if upcoming arm64 support was not put under boards/arm but under boards/arm64 and ARCH=arm64 used instead of ARCH=arm....
> Regards,
>  Scott Branden

Join to automatically receive all group messages.