Re: [Zephyr-users] Help wanted with Atmel SAM ADC (AFEC) driver
Justin
I will work on this for the SAM ADC since I've written some of the other SAM drivers.
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:09 AM Cufi, Carles <carles.cufi@...> wrote: Hi all,
|
|
Help wanted with Atmel SAM ADC (AFEC) driver
Carles Cufi
Hi all,
A rework of the ADC driver API is now ready and existing ADC implementations are being ported to the new API. You can check out the PR [1] with the API and a reference implementation for more details. However, the Atmel SAM ADC (AFEC) driver [2] is currently orphan of a maintainer and we are asking for help to port this driver to the new API. If you have experience with this SoC family and want to contribute a port, you can do so in a PR or branch that we can later include when the new API and adapted implementations are merged. Thanks in advance on behalf of the Zephyr TSC. Regards, Carles [1] https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/7691 [2] https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/master/drivers/adc/adc_sam_afec.c
|
|
Re: Bluetooth: Mesh: about avoiding cloud storage
laczenJMS
Hi Vikrant,
I think it is a bad idea to have this kind message to put the device back into unprovisioned state. Anyone who is using this app with your devices could take over all your devices by using your procedure, and this person even does not need physical access to the devices. I would say every device has some kind of hardware mechanism available to put it into an unprovisioned state. Even if you have no physical button you could work as follows: to put the device in unprovisioned state you need to cycle the power to it for at least 10 times. The power should stay on for 2 seconds but less than 4 seconds. After 2 seconds you increment the counter, after 4 seconds you reset it to 0. When the counter reaches 10 the device goes into unprovisioned state. You can change the counter and times to fit your needs. Hope this helps, Jehudi
|
|
Re: Debug on Eclipse with NXP FRDM-K64F
Carles Cufi
Hi there,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Take a look at: http://docs.zephyrproject.org/application/application.html#eclipse-debugging Regards, Carles
-----Original Message-----
|
|
Debug on Eclipse with NXP FRDM-K64F
clemence
Hi,
I am using the board NXP FRDM-K64F. I would like to debug my code on eclise. How can I do it ? Thanks Clemence
|
|
Bluetooth: Mesh: about avoiding cloud storage service
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
Hi, Assume 1) #BluetoothMesh provisioner App is creating NET & APP key using end-user @username & some unforgettable pass-phrase. 2) as app get un-installed, no relevant file will present on local storage. 3) no hardware mechanism to push NODE into factory reset mode. In this case, even app get un-installed then fresh one could create same NET-APP key pair. Can I send encrypted message on ADV-Bearer to unprovisioned all NODEs in vicinity to their configuration Server (by selecting destination addr. as 0xFFFF) using freshly installed App? Is there any chance so that we could avoid cloud storage with "ANY" Bluetooth Mesh implementation without going against SIG specification for above mentioned assumptions ? Thank You !!
|
|
Bluetooth: Mesh: about avoiding cloud storage
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
Hi, Assume 1) #BluetoothMesh provisioner App is creating NET & APP key using end-user @username & some unforgettable pass-phrase. 2) as app get un-installed, no relevant file will present on local storage. 3) no hardware mechanism to push NODE into factory reset mode. In this case, even app get un-installed then fresh one could create same NET-APP key pair. Can I send encrypted message on ADV-Bearer to unprovisioned all NODEs in vicinity to their configuration Server (by selecting destination addr. as 0xFFFF) using freshly installed App? Is there any chance so that we could avoid cloud storage with "ANY" Bluetooth Mesh implementation without going against SIG specification for above mentioned assumptions ? Thank You !!
|
|
Re: Adding new DTS binding for SAM0 I2C
m.lainani@...
Hi Léonard,
I've been working on adding I2C support for the SAMD21 but I don't feel it is in a state where making a pull request would be relevant: this is my first foray in Zephyr development plus I didn't know much about I2C until a few weeks ago. Still, my driver compiles properly and I was able to validate basic read/write operation. You can check the two commits below. The first is for the driver implementation while the second is for the addition of a new board using the driver in question. https://github.com/mlainani/zephyr/commit/81919b689cf20b1c51d25ef51171fb1d69750e7f https://github.com/mlainani/zephyr/commit/b3b0902620deecc14e881627bde471cb19025c9a Rgds, Madani.
|
|
Re: Adding new DTS binding for SAM0 I2C
Erwan Gouriou
Thanks for the additional info. It would be nice to see what at line 164 in file sodaq_one_v3.dts.pre.tmp. Anyway, my first guess would be that you miss i2c.h binding file inclusion in your dtsi file. #include <dt-bindings/i2c/i2c.h> Erwan
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 at 10:10, Léonard Bise <leonard.bise@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Adding new DTS binding for SAM0 I2C
Léonard Bise <leonard.bise@...>
Hello Erwan, Thanks for your help. Well the thing is that is one of my problem, I don't have much to go by. All I get is a syntax error message from dtc when running cmake: -- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python3 (found suitable version "3.6.5", minimum required is "3.4") -- Selected BOARD sodaq_one_v3 Zephyr version: 1.12.99 Parsing Kconfig tree in /home/leonard/gitrepo/zephyr_fork/Kconfig Using /home/leonard/gitrepo/TravailBachelor/src/Zephyr_sodaq_one_v3/boards/arm/sodaq_one_v3/sodaq_one_v3_defconfig as base Merging /home/leonard/gitrepo/TravailBachelor/src/Zephyr_sodaq_one_v3/prj.conf -- Generating zephyr/include/generated/generated_dts_board.h Error: sodaq_one_v3.dts.pre.tmp:164.21-22 syntax error FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree CMake Error at /home/leonard/gitrepo/zephyr_fork/cmake/dts.cmake:83 (message): command failed with return code: 1 Call Stack (most recent call first): /home/leonard/gitrepo/zephyr_fork/cmake/app/boilerplate.cmake:275 (include) CMakeLists.txt:9 (include) As soon as I comment the following block in my dts file it works again. So I assume that it is related to the new atmel,sam0-i2c binding I added. I added the atmel,sam0-i2c.yaml file in dts/bindings/i2c but I'm not sure if I missed something elsewhere? &sercom3 { status = "ok"; compatible = "atmel,sam0-i2c"; clock-frequency = <I2C_BITRATE_FAST>; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; }; Thank you, Léonard.
On 2 July 2018 at 09:13, Erwan Gouriou <erwan.gouriou@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Adding new DTS binding for SAM0 I2C
Erwan Gouriou
Hi Léonard, Some additional information on build error would help to provide you support. Cheers Erwan
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 at 13:37, Léonard Bise <leonard.bise@...> wrote: I'm trying to add support for SAM0 I2C. Currently my code is compiling as I see warnings in my i2c_sam0.c file.
|
|
Adding new DTS binding for SAM0 I2C
Léonard Bise <leonard.bise@...>
I'm trying to add support for SAM0 I2C. Currently my code is compiling as I see warnings in my i2c_sam0.c file.
However I'm trying to add a new binding for that in zephyr/dts/bindings/i2c/atmel,sam0-i2c.yaml and hitting a wall. ---
title: Atmel SAM0 SERCOM I2C driver
id: atmel,sam0-i2c
version: 0.1
description: >
This binding gives a base representation of the Atmel SAM0 SERCOM I2C driver
inherits:
!include i2c.yaml
properties:
compatible:
type: string
category: required
description: compatible strings
constraint: "atmel,sam0-i2c"
reg:
type: array
description: mmio register space
generation: define
category: required
...
Then in my board dts I added the following: &sercom3 {
status = "ok";
compatible = "atmel,sam0-i2c";
clock-frequency = <I2C_BITRATE_FAST>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
};
But something is missing because I keep getting an error when building that it cannot parse the device tree. I looked around how the other SAM0 device are setup but I didn't find what I'm missing. Any pointer on how I should go about setting up this binding ? Best regards, Léonard.
|
|
Re: SAMD21 I2C support
Léonard Bise <leonard.bise@...>
Hello Michael,
I would be willing to try at least. Hopefully with some guidance it wouldn't be too hard.
I'm currently setting up my fork to have a clean dev env.
Just so I'm clear on what exactly needs to be done.
Anything else I'm missing?
Do you think I should open an issue regarding this ?
Best regards,
Léonard.
|
|
SAMD21 I2C support
Léonard Bise <leodido99@...>
I'm currently working on the board configuration for the SODAQ One which is very similar to the Adafruit Feather M0 already supported by Zephyr. Console is working and I setup the SPI bus. I also managed to operate the RN2483 LoRa chip through UART. This board has an uBlox EVA 8M GPS and LSM303AGR Accelerometer connected to the I2C bus (SERCOM3) which I'm trying to configure properly. My problem is that the other SAM0 Family boards supported don't mention any I2C in their configuration. I was expecting of finding something like for the UART/SPI i.e. CONFIG_I2C_SAM0 but it doesn't exist. I found however a generic SAM one, can I use this one? (CONFIG_I2C_SAM_TWI). Any pointer on how to configure the i2c device please? Thank you, Léonard.
|
|
Re: SAMD21 I2C support
Michael Hope
Hi Leonard. I did a bit of the original SAMD21 bring up. There's no support for I2C ATM but you're welcome to add it.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018, 12:45 , <leonard.bise@...> wrote: I'm currently working on the board configuration for the SODAQ One which is very similar to the Adafruit Feather M0 already supported by Zephyr.
|
|
SAMD21 I2C support
leonard.bise@...
I'm currently working on the board configuration for the SODAQ One which is very similar to the Adafruit Feather M0 already supported by Zephyr.
Console is working and I setup the SPI bus. I also managed to operate the RN2483 LoRa chip through UART.
This board has an uBlox EVA 8M GPS and LSM303AGR Accelerometer connected to the I2C bus (SERCOM3) which I'm trying to configure properly.
My problem is that the other SAM0 Family boards supported don't mention any I2C in their configuration.
I was expecting of finding something like for the UART/SPI i.e. CONFIG_I2C_SAM0 but it doesn't exist. I found however a generic SAM one, can I use this one? (CONFIG_I2C_SAM_TWI).
Any pointer on how to configure the i2c device please?
Thank you,
Léonard.
|
|
Bluetooth: Mesh: How to reduce provisioning time ?
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
Hi, How to reduce time required to "provisioning + reconnection to proxy service" (in case of OOB authentication disabled) compared to default configuration ? Thank You !!
|
|
Re: Sleep current on
#nrf52480
ismael fillonneau
Hi
You could also try following patch which is currently under review:
Regards,
Ismael
|
|
Re: SODAQ One V3 porting
Léonard Bise <leodido99@...>
Back again! So this is weird because I got it working but without TX interrupts. RX interrupts work fine however as soon as I enable TX interrupts with uart_irq_tx_enable I enter an interruption loop. Using uart_poll_out to send data works properly. Also I just noticed that the example (samples/subsys/usb/cdc_arm) on which I was basing my test code doesn't respect what is written in the documentation. It is said that uart_fifo_read must only be used from within an interruption which is not the case in the test sample. Does anyone know why I would enter the interruption loop on UART TX? Best regards, Léonard.
On 28 June 2018 at 10:42, Léonard Bise <leodido99@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Sleep current on
#nrf52480
Sebastian Boe
550uA usually means that the HFCLK is running.
The HFCLK will run when something (peripheral) needs it. You need to find out what is using it, unfortunately neither the HW or the SW is able to tell you this, so if I was you I would manually (using CMSIS) start turning everything off until the current died down. Timers, etc. NRF_TIMER0->TASKS_STOP = 1; etc. after finding the peripheral that is requesting HFCLK I would find out which SW module turned it on and if it makes sense for it be on (is this a bug or not). ________________________________________ From: devel@lists.zephyrproject.org <devel@lists.zephyrproject.org> on behalf of Fabien Lepoutre <fabien@culvertengineering.com> Sent: Friday, 29 June 2018 1:28:45 AM To: zephyr-devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Subject: [Zephyr-devel] Sleep current on #nRF52480 Hi all, I've ran some power consumption tests with Zephyr 1.12 #... a00646a5 Using the samples/boards/nrf52/pwr_mgr at lowest power mode, I find that the nrf52840 has a sleep current of ~550uA. When I run simple power management code with Nordic SDK in sleep mode, I get about ~30uA. To run these tests, I used the PCA52840 PDK board and measured the current using the Nordic Power Profiler Kit and also a third party solution. I'm confident the current numbers are right. Has anyone ran sleep power measurements on the nrf52840 and have different results? I would like to understand the discrepancy between Zephyr OS and nordic SDK to bring down my current power numbers to the SDK ones. Thanks a lot!
|
|