|
Re: "dummy-flash" device tree possible bug?
Hi Diego,
Take a look at the mimxrt1050_evk board. The SoC doesn’t have embedded flash, so I mapped the flash entry to ITCM which is in SRAM. “zephyr,sram” is mapped to DTCM, which is a
Hi Diego,
Take a look at the mimxrt1050_evk board. The SoC doesn’t have embedded flash, so I mapped the flash entry to ITCM which is in SRAM. “zephyr,sram” is mapped to DTCM, which is a
|
By
Maureen Helm
·
#1737
·
|
|
Re: Building Zephyr like there's no CMake
Hi,
these scripts are great (albeit not upstreamable),
these are my aliases, I combine them with "export BOARD":
alias t='~/zephyr/scripts/sanitycheck -T$PWD'
alias gn='git clean -ffdx'
alias
Hi,
these scripts are great (albeit not upstreamable),
these are my aliases, I combine them with "export BOARD":
alias t='~/zephyr/scripts/sanitycheck -T$PWD'
alias gn='git clean -ffdx'
alias
|
By
Sebastian Boe
·
#1736
·
|
|
[Bluetooth] Is BT 5.0 specific features supported by Zephyr for nRF52840 board yet?
Hello Zephyr Developers,
I am looking for zephyr based application for verifying BT 5.0 specific features like LE Extended Advertising, LE Long Range (2M PHY), LE High Speed (2M PHY) etc. on my
Hello Zephyr Developers,
I am looking for zephyr based application for verifying BT 5.0 specific features like LE Extended Advertising, LE Long Range (2M PHY), LE High Speed (2M PHY) etc. on my
|
By
Anupam Roy
·
#1735
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hi Vikrant and Neves,
I have submitted a PR that will correctly “disable” Coded PHY support in nRF52840, in turn avoiding the PPI channels 14 to 19 and hence usable by pwm_nrf5_sw.c
Hi Vikrant and Neves,
I have submitted a PR that will correctly “disable” Coded PHY support in nRF52840, in turn avoiding the PPI channels 14 to 19 and hence usable by pwm_nrf5_sw.c
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#1734
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hi Felipe,
Thanks for you support.
I also used this style to take advantage of SoC built-in PWM module.
But was not able to generate PWM with different pulse_width using same instance.
Now it is
Hi Felipe,
Thanks for you support.
I also used this style to take advantage of SoC built-in PWM module.
But was not able to generate PWM with different pulse_width using same instance.
Now it is
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#1733
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hello guys.
@Vikrant you are right, the current implementation of nrf pwm's driver uses a software based PWM combined with the PPI.
Here in my work we are using zephyr built for nordic target with
Hello guys.
@Vikrant you are right, the current implementation of nrf pwm's driver uses a software based PWM combined with the PPI.
Here in my work we are using zephyr built for nordic target with
|
By
Felipe Neves <ryukokki.felipe@...>
·
#1732
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
I'm not able to understand what you are saying.
Is that means Zephyr PWM (fade_led example) is using software to generate PWM instead of separate dedicated
SoC's internal PWM module ?
I'm not able to understand what you are saying.
Is that means Zephyr PWM (fade_led example) is using software to generate PWM instead of separate dedicated
SoC's internal PWM module ?
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#1731
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Your main.c uses pwm_nrf5_sw.c driver which has conflict with BT features on nRF52840...
I do not see use of NRF_PWM0 in you main.c, of course, yes your code in the devzone does, hope you get some
Your main.c uses pwm_nrf5_sw.c driver which has conflict with BT features on nRF52840...
I do not see use of NRF_PWM0 in you main.c, of course, yes your code in the devzone does, hope you get some
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#1730
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
>> Again, I will like to iterate that for nRF52840, h/w PWM driver has to be used, feel free to contribute (isn’t it fun to develop than test ;) )
Means ??
I am using h/w PWM only !! Have you looked
>> Again, I will like to iterate that for nRF52840, h/w PWM driver has to be used, feel free to contribute (isn’t it fun to develop than test ;) )
Means ??
I am using h/w PWM only !! Have you looked
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#1729
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hi Vikrant,
As i said, there is possible overlap of PPIs with BT Controller. PPI channel 16 and 17 overlap with Code PHY feature in nRF52840.
I will try to send a PR wherein you could
Hi Vikrant,
As i said, there is possible overlap of PPIs with BT Controller. PPI channel 16 and 17 overlap with Code PHY feature in nRF52840.
I will try to send a PR wherein you could
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#1728
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hi Vinayak,
fade_led sample runs as expected. We are trying to generate PWM on two channels. Adding
pwm_pin_set_usec(pwm_dev, PWM_CHANNEL0,PERIOD, pulse_width);
pwm_pin_set_usec(pwm_dev,
Hi Vinayak,
fade_led sample runs as expected. We are trying to generate PWM on two channels. Adding
pwm_pin_set_usec(pwm_dev, PWM_CHANNEL0,PERIOD, pulse_width);
pwm_pin_set_usec(pwm_dev,
|
By
ashish.shukla@corvi.com <ashish.shukla@...>
·
#1727
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hi Vikrant,
I have run the upstream fade_led sample on nrf52840-PDK, I see no regression, the brightness changes every second (up and then down so on).
I advice you to debug your implementation
Hi Vikrant,
I have run the upstream fade_led sample on nrf52840-PDK, I see no regression, the brightness changes every second (up and then down so on).
I advice you to debug your implementation
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#1726
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hi Vikrant,
Please try the PWM without the BT Controller included. There could be some PWM regression due to changes in controller implementation.
That said the nrf5_sw driver is software
Hi Vikrant,
Please try the PWM without the BT Controller included. There could be some PWM regression due to changes in controller implementation.
That said the nrf5_sw driver is software
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#1725
·
|
|
Re: "dummy-flash" device tree possible bug?
Hello Michael,
You mean setting the same entry for the flash and sram? Something like that?
chosen {
zephyr,flash = &ocram;
zephyr,sram = &ocram;
zephyr,console = &uart2;
Hello Michael,
You mean setting the same entry for the flash and sram? Something like that?
chosen {
zephyr,flash = &ocram;
zephyr,sram = &ocram;
zephyr,console = &uart2;
|
By
Diego Sueiro
·
#1724
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hi Marti,
>>Are you using the latest master?
Yes
Hi Marti,
>>Are you using the latest master?
Yes
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#1723
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
Hi Vikrant,
Are you using the latest master?
Three improvements to nRF PWM went in fairly recently:
3f1dbfda1 pwm: nrf5_sw: don't disable timer if another channel is still active
ab399a1cf pwm:
Hi Vikrant,
Are you using the latest master?
Three improvements to nRF PWM went in fairly recently:
3f1dbfda1 pwm: nrf5_sw: don't disable timer if another channel is still active
ab399a1cf pwm:
|
By
Marti Bolivar
·
#1721
·
|
|
Re: "dummy-flash" device tree possible bug?
Hi Diego. zephyr,flash sets where the main code is stored and is used to calculate the address and size of the code section. In your case it probably doesn't make sense as you'll probably store
Hi Diego. zephyr,flash sets where the main code is stored and is used to calculate the address and size of the code section. In your case it probably doesn't make sense as you'll probably store
|
By
Michael Hope <michaelh@...>
·
#1720
·
|
|
"dummy-flash" device tree possible bug?
Hi there,
I'm currently working on porting Zephyr to i.MX7 SoC and I'm facing an error with cmake when it is generating the generated_dts_board.h.
I want to use only the sram and in my dts I removed
Hi there,
I'm currently working on porting Zephyr to i.MX7 SoC and I'm facing an error with cmake when it is generating the generated_dts_board.h.
I want to use only the sram and in my dts I removed
|
By
Diego Sueiro
·
#1719
·
|
|
Re: DHT22 Sensor driver
Yes, I can do it. Tks!
By
Primini
·
#1718
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Buggy PWM driver for nRF52
I took reference of $zephy/samples/samples/fade_led project
& add following parameters in my
I took reference of $zephy/samples/samples/fade_led project
& add following parameters in my
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#1717
·
|