|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
Thanks all for the feedback.
We seem to have a slim consensus on “settings” so I will go for that.
Regards,
Carles
Thanks all for the feedback.
We seem to have a slim consensus on “settings” so I will go for that.
Regards,
Carles
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#1979
·
|
|
LittlevGL - Open-source Embedded GUI Library
Hi All,
A couple of hours ago I issued a pull request [1] introducing a new external library providing a framework to create GUIs.
While doing so I encountered some issues:
1) The library is licensed
Hi All,
A couple of hours ago I issued a pull request [1] introducing a new external library providing a framework to create GUIs.
While doing so I encountered some issues:
1) The library is licensed
|
By
Jan Van Winkel <jan.van_winkel@...>
·
#1978
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
I like settings. Do not thing it is long, sett just makes it ugly.
Anas
I like settings. Do not thing it is long, sett just makes it ugly.
Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#1977
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
The advantage of “settings” is that it matches what other people mean by those:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201274
The disadvantage is that it is a bit longJ “sett_” perhaps as a
The advantage of “settings” is that it matches what other people mean by those:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201274
The disadvantage is that it is a bit longJ “sett_” perhaps as a
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#1976
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
I actually like "settings",
I find it carries well the idea of run time configuration
I actually like "settings",
I find it carries well the idea of run time configuration
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#1975
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
Hi Sterling,
Thanks for the feedback.
Hi Sterling,
Thanks for the feedback.
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#1974
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for the feedback.
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for the feedback.
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#1973
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
I like syscfg mentioned below.
I like syscfg mentioned below.
|
By
Sterling Hughes <sterling@...>
·
#1972
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
Hi Erwan,
Thanks for the feedback.
I did think about using “marshalling”, but I thought it was less common than “serialization” so I went for the “s11n” abbreviation.
I would
Hi Erwan,
Thanks for the feedback.
I did think about using “marshalling”, but I thought it was less common than “serialization” so I went for the “s11n” abbreviation.
I would
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#1971
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
Hi Carles,
as this seems to be about configuration settings, why not
settings
cfgdb
or something like that. Why do we need to mention the serialization at
all in the function names, that sounds
Hi Carles,
as this seems to be about configuration settings, why not
settings
cfgdb
or something like that. Why do we need to mention the serialization at
all in the function names, that sounds
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#1970
·
|
|
Re: Runtime "configuration" system naming
Hi Carles,
Serialization is also sometime called marshalling, so an alternative could be "marshal"/"cfg_marshal"/"rtcfg_marshal"
Cheers
Erwan
Hi Carles,
Serialization is also sometime called marshalling, so an alternative could be "marshal"/"cfg_marshal"/"rtcfg_marshal"
Cheers
Erwan
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#1969
·
|
|
Runtime "configuration" system naming
Hi all,
Andrzej from Nordic has just ported the *run-time* configuration system from Mynewt into Zephyr [1].
This is essentially a system-wide way of loading and storing all state from and to
Hi all,
Andrzej from Nordic has just ported the *run-time* configuration system from Mynewt into Zephyr [1].
This is essentially a system-wide way of loading and storing all state from and to
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#1968
·
|
|
Re: [Bluetooth mesh]CONFIG_BT_PERIPHERAL, what does it mean?
Yes, I had to increate both stacks’ size, current configuration is:
CONFIG_MAIN_STACK_SIZE=640 (from 512)
CONFIG_BT_RX_STACK_SIZE=1450 (from 1100)
Regards,
Kai
Yes, I had to increate both stacks’ size, current configuration is:
CONFIG_MAIN_STACK_SIZE=640 (from 512)
CONFIG_BT_RX_STACK_SIZE=1450 (from 1100)
Regards,
Kai
|
By
Kai Ren
·
#1967
·
|
|
Re: [Bluetooth mesh]CONFIG_BT_PERIPHERAL, what does it mean?
Thanks Kai. Glad to know you have PB-GATT sans micro:bit display, working.
Did you have to increase the STACK_SIZE(s)? if so, which ones?
Regards,
Vinayak
Thanks Kai. Glad to know you have PB-GATT sans micro:bit display, working.
Did you have to increase the STACK_SIZE(s)? if so, which ones?
Regards,
Vinayak
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#1966
·
|
|
What is need of addition authentication in case of #BluetoothMesh if ECDH public key exchanged over OOB ?
#bluetoothmesh
Hi,
If #BluetoothMesh DEVICE ECDH-public key (oob public key) is exchanged over OOB channel then what is further need of authentication using input-OOB or output-OOB or static-OOB ?
Thanks,
Hi,
If #BluetoothMesh DEVICE ECDH-public key (oob public key) is exchanged over OOB channel then what is further need of authentication using input-OOB or output-OOB or static-OOB ?
Thanks,
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#1965
·
|
|
Re: How hacker will hack/impact my BLE device, when ...??
Hi,
I think we can do OOB pairing, even if Device doesn't have display to share Passkey with user App.
1. Create ECDH public-private key pair (only once in Device life)
2. Read ECDH-Public key via
Hi,
I think we can do OOB pairing, even if Device doesn't have display to share Passkey with user App.
1. Create ECDH public-private key pair (only once in Device life)
2. Read ECDH-Public key via
|
By
Vikrant More <vikrant8051@...>
·
#1964
·
|
|
Re: [Bluetooth mesh]CONFIG_BT_PERIPHERAL, what does it mean?
Hi Vinayak,
I followed your instruction to disable some features above Bluetooth core spec v4.0, like 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0 as follow:
#Controller
#5.0
Hi Vinayak,
I followed your instruction to disable some features above Bluetooth core spec v4.0, like 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0 as follow:
#Controller
#5.0
|
By
Kai Ren
·
#1963
·
|
|
Board Config Files
I'm attempting to port over a custom board (NRF52832) and I'm a little confused by which config files are still being used (CMAKE build).
Should I be putting my configurations in <board>_defconfig,
I'm attempting to port over a custom board (NRF52832) and I'm a little confused by which config files are still being used (CMAKE build).
Should I be putting my configurations in <board>_defconfig,
|
By
Justin
·
#1962
·
|
|
Re: [Bluetooth mesh]CONFIG_BT_PERIPHERAL, what does it mean?
Hi Ken,
As the faulting instruction address is in RAM, I suspect an overflow of some thread call stack. The PB-GATT may not have been tested on micro:bit due to restricted amount of RAM.
But,
Hi Ken,
As the faulting instruction address is in RAM, I suspect an overflow of some thread call stack. The PB-GATT may not have been tested on micro:bit due to restricted amount of RAM.
But,
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#1961
·
|
|
Re: [Bluetooth mesh]CONFIG_BT_PERIPHERAL, what does it mean?
Hi Johan,
Thank you for the proposal, I've tested it.
I copied microbit_gatt.conf and reduced CONFIG_BT_L2CAP_TX_BUF_COUNT to 2, RAM usage is 99.93%, which can make it fit micro:bit RAM size, but
Hi Johan,
Thank you for the proposal, I've tested it.
I copied microbit_gatt.conf and reduced CONFIG_BT_L2CAP_TX_BUF_COUNT to 2, RAM usage is 99.93%, which can make it fit micro:bit RAM size, but
|
By
Kai Ren
·
#1960
·
|