|
Re: Azure IOT Device Client SDK
Initially I want to connect to IOT Hub using MQTT and/or HTTPS. My plan is to support all industrial protocols but initial support should be minimum ( CAN, J1939, Modbus, OPC-UA, OBDII, ) and reading
Initially I want to connect to IOT Hub using MQTT and/or HTTPS. My plan is to support all industrial protocols but initial support should be minimum ( CAN, J1939, Modbus, OPC-UA, OBDII, ) and reading
|
By
Tameezuddin Mohammad
·
#2105
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] [Zephyr-devel] not able to complete #BluetoothMesh provisioning & configuration process using #meshctl (5.49)
#meshctl
#bluetoothmesh
Hi,
I had a chance to look at this further.
More at the bottom.
It doesn't appear that bt_mesh_proxy_identity_enable() gets called in
prov.c:proxy_data(). The earlier call to bt_mesh_provision()
Hi,
I had a chance to look at this further.
More at the bottom.
It doesn't appear that bt_mesh_proxy_identity_enable() gets called in
prov.c:proxy_data(). The earlier call to bt_mesh_provision()
|
By
Steve Brown
·
#2104
·
|
|
Re: Azure IOT Device Client SDK
I’m not aware of any work on Azure. I am putting some work into having better support for Google Cloud services, and I intend the result to be fairly easy to adapt to other providers. Do you know
I’m not aware of any work on Azure. I am putting some work into having better support for Google Cloud services, and I intend the result to be fairly easy to adapt to other providers. Do you know
|
By
David Brown
·
#2103
·
|
|
Re: Extending Error Codes
Hi.
I do not think that per-module error codes are good idea.
First, you cannot to this:
foo_error_t foo(void)
{
boo_error_t error = boo();
if (error != BOO_SUCCESS)
return error; // Here you
Hi.
I do not think that per-module error codes are good idea.
First, you cannot to this:
foo_error_t foo(void)
{
boo_error_t error = boo();
if (error != BOO_SUCCESS)
return error; // Here you
|
By
piotr.ziecik@...
·
#2102
·
|
|
Re: Extending Error Codes
I also see that error cods defined in <errno.h> are insufficient.
I think definition value-space for module specific codes are good idea in general. But I'm afraid we can go down the road in case we
I also see that error cods defined in <errno.h> are insufficient.
I think definition value-space for module specific codes are good idea in general. But I'm afraid we can go down the road in case we
|
By
Puzdrowski, Andrzej
·
#2101
·
|
|
Azure IOT Device Client SDK
Hi there,
Want to know if someone is working on the Azure IOT Device SDK ( Client ) to port to Zephyr, Is Microsoft have some plans to support Zephyr RTOS via device SDK?
Regards,
Tameez Mohammad
Hi there,
Want to know if someone is working on the Azure IOT Device SDK ( Client ) to port to Zephyr, Is Microsoft have some plans to support Zephyr RTOS via device SDK?
Regards,
Tameez Mohammad
|
By
Tameezuddin Mohammad
·
#2100
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Device Firmware Update + Zephyr +
#bluetoothmesh
Vikrant,
answering inline.
Ok.
I really need that.
Do you need help on that? I am a little bit confusing.
I was willing to create the sample related to OTA and mesh. But if there is other sample
Vikrant,
answering inline.
Ok.
I really need that.
Do you need help on that? I am a little bit confusing.
I was willing to create the sample related to OTA and mesh. But if there is other sample
|
By
Rodrigo Peixoto <rodrigopex@...>
·
#2099
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Device Firmware Update + Zephyr +
#bluetoothmesh
Hi Rodrigo,
Working on #DFU_OTA feature is not at top of my priority list. I had just checked it & try to understand overall mechanism.
Now I will prefer to wait till
1) Zephyr #BluetoothMesh stack
Hi Rodrigo,
Working on #DFU_OTA feature is not at top of my priority list. I had just checked it & try to understand overall mechanism.
Now I will prefer to wait till
1) Zephyr #BluetoothMesh stack
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#2098
·
|
|
Extending Error Codes
Hello Zephyr Developers,
I recently had a request to change the error codes in a zephyr module
to use the standard supplied error codes. Doing so would reduce the
descriptiveness of the error codes
Hello Zephyr Developers,
I recently had a request to change the error codes in a zephyr module
to use the standard supplied error codes. Doing so would reduce the
descriptiveness of the error codes
|
By
laczenJMS
·
#2097
·
|
|
Re: Shave Zephyr boards with Occam's razor
Good! Thanks Carles.
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#2096
·
|
|
Re: Shave Zephyr boards with Occam's razor
In case anyone is wondering, the current dtc version in our Windows packaging scheme is 1.4.4, so we should be safe in this regard.
In case anyone is wondering, the current dtc version in our Windows packaging scheme is 1.4.4, so we should be safe in this regard.
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#2095
·
|
|
Re: Shave Zephyr boards with Occam's razor
Hi all,
Guidelines for default board configuration are now documented in Zephyr board porting guide.
Next step will be to get all existing boards to comply with these guidelines.
I've open issue
Hi all,
Guidelines for default board configuration are now documented in Zephyr board porting guide.
Next step will be to get all existing boards to comply with these guidelines.
I've open issue
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#2094
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-tsc] Examples for "Zstream" Socket/TLS API
Hello Patrik,
"Flykt, Patrik" <patrik.flykt@...> wrote:
The "big_http_download" example I was talking about is based on
the "http_get" and is a further extension of it. Unlike
Hello Patrik,
"Flykt, Patrik" <patrik.flykt@...> wrote:
The "big_http_download" example I was talking about is based on
the "http_get" and is a further extension of it. Unlike
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#2093
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-tsc] Examples for "Zstream" Socket/TLS API
Hi,
I looked through the socket based samples in the Zephyr source code and
for the sake of presenting the various API options, I think we should
go with something very close to the http_get/ example
Hi,
I looked through the socket based samples in the Zephyr source code and
for the sake of presenting the various API options, I think we should
go with something very close to the http_get/ example
|
By
Flykt, Patrik <patrik.flykt@...>
·
#2092
·
|
|
Examples for "Zstream" Socket/TLS API
Hello,
At yesterday's TSC meeting, it was requested to provide examples of the
usage of 2 contender TLS APIs, to better assess trade-offs they make.
(Please see an earlier email today re: background
Hello,
At yesterday's TSC meeting, it was requested to provide examples of the
usage of 2 contender TLS APIs, to better assess trade-offs they make.
(Please see an earlier email today re: background
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#2091
·
|
|
Re: FOTA takes so long to complete (MCUBoot + mcumgr + Bluetooth)
Hi,
3. Use the 2Mbps Phy. The code should already be setting a preference to
it automatically, so I *think* it then only depends on whether the
remote side is able to do 2Mbps.
Johan
Hi,
3. Use the 2Mbps Phy. The code should already be setting a preference to
it automatically, so I *think* it then only depends on whether the
remote side is able to do 2Mbps.
Johan
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#2090
·
|
|
Re: FOTA takes so long to complete (MCUBoot + mcumgr + Bluetooth)
Hi Rodrigo,
There are a few things that might help:
1. Increate the GATT MTU: We might need to increase the buffer size on
Zephyr and then use Exchange MTU command to enable it. By default, it
is
Hi Rodrigo,
There are a few things that might help:
1. Increate the GATT MTU: We might need to increase the buffer size on
Zephyr and then use Exchange MTU command to enable it. By default, it
is
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#2089
·
|
|
FOTA takes so long to complete (MCUBoot + mcumgr + Bluetooth)
Hello,
I could make the FOTA via Bluetooth work following the documentation (http://docs.zephyrproject.org/samples/subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/smp_svr/README.html). It was not so easy, in fact, some parts of
Hello,
I could make the FOTA via Bluetooth work following the documentation (http://docs.zephyrproject.org/samples/subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/smp_svr/README.html). It was not so easy, in fact, some parts of
|
By
Rodrigo Peixoto <rodrigopex@...>
·
#2088
·
|
|
[RFC] TLS API(s) for Socket-based applications in Zephyr
Hello,
It occurred to me that the matter of TLS API for BSD Sockets based
application, which was discussed for few months at the online (spoken)
Zephyr Networking Forum meetings and in Github
Hello,
It occurred to me that the matter of TLS API for BSD Sockets based
application, which was discussed for few months at the online (spoken)
Zephyr Networking Forum meetings and in Github
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#2087
·
|
|
Re: fatal error: config-mini-tls1_2.h: No such file or directory
Hii
Indeed, this example is working fine, I tried again and it runs. But, In my application, I don't have an idea why it doesn't work.
I'm developing an http_client library and I want to add an
Hii
Indeed, this example is working fine, I tried again and it runs. But, In my application, I don't have an idea why it doesn't work.
I'm developing an http_client library and I want to add an
|
By
christian tavares
·
#2086
·
|