|
RFC: Random numbers
Hi Marcus,
Lets move the discussion of
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/c/12341 here since it should be
quite important to get it right if we intend Zephyr to be somewhat
secure OS.
--
Luiz
Hi Marcus,
Lets move the discussion of
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/c/12341 here since it should be
quite important to get it right if we intend Zephyr to be somewhat
secure OS.
--
Luiz
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#246
·
|
|
Re: File system in zephyr flashed on Arduino 101
Not clear where you made these changes. Are you referring to the
sample app function test_file_write()?
Not sure what is going on. Assuming the file system got corrupted,
you can try recreating
Not clear where you made these changes. Are you referring to the
sample app function test_file_write()?
Not sure what is going on. Assuming the file system got corrupted,
you can try recreating
|
By
Thomas, Ramesh
·
#245
·
|
|
Re: File system in zephyr flashed on Arduino 101
Can anyone tell me where the file is stored I mean which part if the memory
Can anyone tell me where the file is stored I mean which part if the memory
|
By
Ani
·
#244
·
|
|
Re: LWM2M: Call for proposals
Is your implementation available anywhere public already?
Don't think we should restrict Zephyr to have only client support, but
I would imagine that is the most important piece to start with.
Looks
Is your implementation available anywhere public already?
Don't think we should restrict Zephyr to have only client support, but
I would imagine that is the most important piece to start with.
Looks
|
By
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo <ricardo.salveti@...>
·
#243
·
|
|
Re: NXP FRDM-K64F and OpenOCD from 0.9.0 SDK issue
Hi Piotr,
By
Maureen Helm
·
#241
·
|
|
Re: LWM2M: Call for proposals
Hello Anas,
I would like to try our LWM2M client only implementation in Zephyr and as recently have been working hard
to get it more portable and independent of Contiki it should be fairly easy I
Hello Anas,
I would like to try our LWM2M client only implementation in Zephyr and as recently have been working hard
to get it more portable and independent of Contiki it should be fairly easy I
|
By
Joakim Eriksson <joakim.eriksson@...>
·
#242
·
|
|
LWM2M: Call for proposals
Hi,
In different forums and discussions around Zephyr features and the roadmap some interest was shown for getting LWM2M support in Zephyr.
Talking with different people and organizations we
Hi,
In different forums and discussions around Zephyr features and the roadmap some interest was shown for getting LWM2M support in Zephyr.
Talking with different people and organizations we
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#240
·
|
|
Re: Daily digests...
+1, I miss these and it would be good to have them back.
+1, I miss these and it would be good to have them back.
|
By
Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...>
·
#238
·
|
|
Re: File volume stats
That is correct.
By
Thomas, Ramesh
·
#239
·
|
|
Re: about multicasting with IPv4
Hi,
it is not enough to just add an API for adding the multicast address to
the interface. In order to routers send multicast traffic to the
device, it needs to also join IPv4 multicast group.
For
Hi,
it is not enough to just add an API for adding the multicast address to
the interface. In order to routers send multicast traffic to the
device, it needs to also join IPv4 multicast group.
For
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#237
·
|
|
File system in zephyr flashed on Arduino 101
I am using zephyr RTOS on Arduino 101. Ihave flashed the file system code where in the data is written in a file using fs_write as mentioned in the sample code. The changes I made are :
1. changed
I am using zephyr RTOS on Arduino 101. Ihave flashed the file system code where in the data is written in a file using fs_write as mentioned in the sample code. The changes I made are :
1. changed
|
By
Ani
·
#236
·
|
|
Re: about multicasting with IPv4
Dear Jukka,
Thanks for kind response.
I have a quesiton.
Is it possible to support IPv4 if only we make the api to add multicast address?
Is that the only thing to do for enabling multicasting
Dear Jukka,
Thanks for kind response.
I have a quesiton.
Is it possible to support IPv4 if only we make the api to add multicast address?
Is that the only thing to do for enabling multicasting
|
By
황윤희 <yunhee.hwang@...>
·
#235
·
|
|
Re: File volume stats
> Allocation unit size = 1024
This is 1024 bytes right?
> Free space in f_frsize units = 1795
So free space would be (1795*1024)bytes.
Am I correct here?
> Allocation unit size = 1024
This is 1024 bytes right?
> Free space in f_frsize units = 1795
So free space would be (1795*1024)bytes.
Am I correct here?
|
By
phani karthik cs <phanikartcs@...>
·
#234
·
|
|
Re: File volume stats
This is the sector size. Data transfer size of the physical storage media.
Minimum size of storage the file system will allocate when writing new
data. Will be multiples of block size.
f_frsize is
This is the sector size. Data transfer size of the physical storage media.
Minimum size of storage the file system will allocate when writing new
data. Will be multiples of block size.
f_frsize is
|
By
Thomas, Ramesh
·
#233
·
|
|
File volume stats
Hello all,
Iam having trouble interpreting the fs_statvfs function. How to interpret the below results that i ran on arduino 101
-------------------------------------------------
Optimal transfer
Hello all,
Iam having trouble interpreting the fs_statvfs function. How to interpret the below results that i ran on arduino 101
-------------------------------------------------
Optimal transfer
|
By
phani karthik cs <phanikartcs@...>
·
#232
·
|
|
NXP FRDM-K64F and OpenOCD from 0.9.0 SDK issue
Hi all,
I'm not sure why, but OpenOCD from SDK can't flash and debug my K64F:
```
[16:51:40] pietrushnic:hello_world git:(master*) $ make BOARD=frdm_k64f flash
make[1]: Entering directory
Hi all,
I'm not sure why, but OpenOCD from SDK can't flash and debug my K64F:
```
[16:51:40] pietrushnic:hello_world git:(master*) $ make BOARD=frdm_k64f flash
make[1]: Entering directory
|
By
Piotr Król <piotr.krol@...>
·
#231
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] MPU support for debugging
I was indeed thinking that non-cachable RAM region would be declared at the SoC level. It's simple and efficient. However, probably not compatible with per thread memory protection as a security
I was indeed thinking that non-cachable RAM region would be declared at the SoC level. It's simple and efficient. However, probably not compatible with per thread memory protection as a security
|
By
Piotr Mienkowski
·
#230
·
|
|
Re: about multicasting with IPv4
Hi,
IPv4 multicast support is not really there yet. We have space in net_if
struct (see net_if.h) for storing the IPv4 multicast addresses but
currently there is no API to set and/or use them.
Feel
Hi,
IPv4 multicast support is not really there yet. We have space in net_if
struct (see net_if.h) for storing the IPv4 multicast addresses but
currently there is no API to set and/or use them.
Feel
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#229
·
|
|
Re: Upgrade of RTC api.
I have just realized that my previous idea with alarm descriptors has one drawback.
Lets suppose the counter value is 4. If rtc needs 2 ticks to start working and catch compare events (for example
I have just realized that my previous idea with alarm descriptors has one drawback.
Lets suppose the counter value is 4. If rtc needs 2 ticks to start working and catch compare events (for example
|
By
Michał Kruszewski <mkru@...>
·
#228
·
|
|
about multicasting with IPv4
Hello all,
I have a question about IPV4 dev status.
I check some networking funtions with IPv4.
It seems to me that Zephyr doesn't have the api to set IPv4 multicast address .
Doesn't Zephyr
Hello all,
I have a question about IPV4 dev status.
I check some networking funtions with IPv4.
It seems to me that Zephyr doesn't have the api to set IPv4 multicast address .
Doesn't Zephyr
|
By
황윤희 <yunhee.hwang@...>
·
#227
·
|