|
Re: Daily Gerrit Digest
While I like getting these emails, any reason why I've received 3 different copies today, and at that they all seem to have different data in them?
While I like getting these emails, any reason why I've received 3 different copies today, and at that they all seem to have different data in them?
|
By
Kalowsky, Daniel <daniel.kalowsky@...>
·
#2656
·
|
|
[RFC] Device: device_get_binding() returns NULL if device fails initialization
Problem Statement:
Currently, there is no way to know if a driver fails initialization.
Problem Description:
Zephyr currently does not provide a way to check programmatically
whether a device can be
Problem Statement:
Currently, there is no way to know if a driver fails initialization.
Problem Description:
Zephyr currently does not provide a way to check programmatically
whether a device can be
|
By
Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@...>
·
#2655
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1230 : test: kernel/test_timer/nanokernel increase timeout.
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1251 : sensor: make runtime
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1230 : test: kernel/test_timer/nanokernel increase timeout.
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1251 : sensor: make runtime
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2654
·
|
|
Gerrit changes
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1227 : doc: Editing notices page to be more concise and relevant to Zephyr
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1228 : sensor:
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1227 : doc: Editing notices page to be more concise and relevant to Zephyr
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1228 : sensor:
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2653
·
|
|
Zephyr v1.2.0 tagged
Hi,
We tagged v1.2.0 and merge window for the next release is now open.
Changes since v1.2.0-rc1 are below:
Alexandre d'Alton (2):
arc: implement stack checking
arc: remove unecessary
Hi,
We tagged v1.2.0 and merge window for the next release is now open.
Changes since v1.2.0-rc1 are below:
Alexandre d'Alton (2):
arc: implement stack checking
arc: remove unecessary
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#2650
·
|
|
Gerrit changes
NEW within last 24 hours:
UPDATED within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1072 : drivers/nble: Implement notification response
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1208 :
NEW within last 24 hours:
UPDATED within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1072 : drivers/nble: Implement notification response
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1208 :
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2652
·
|
|
Gerrit changes
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1213 : test: ignore
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1212 : Zephyr 1.2.0
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1211 :
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1213 : test: ignore
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1212 : Zephyr 1.2.0
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1211 :
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2651
·
|
|
Gerrit changes
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1199 : drivers/nble: Add support for attr iteration functions
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1195 :
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1199 : drivers/nble: Add support for attr iteration functions
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1195 :
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2649
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.2.0-rc2 tagged
Hi,
We tagged release candidate 2 and planning to release 1.2.0 end of the day Friday. There are already a few bug fixes on top of rc2 that will be in the final release.
Below is the log since
Hi,
We tagged release candidate 2 and planning to release 1.2.0 end of the day Friday. There are already a few bug fixes on top of rc2 that will be in the final release.
Below is the log since
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#2648
·
|
|
Re: RFC: extend sanitycheck testcase filtering expressiveness
Andrew,
Eval is widely used in many projects, e.g. yocto. Its safety depends on what area you apply it. To build up a public server which allow any user input, maybe it is unsafe. For testcase
Andrew,
Eval is widely used in many projects, e.g. yocto. Its safety depends on what area you apply it. To build up a public server which allow any user input, maybe it is unsafe. For testcase
|
By
Wang, Jing J
·
#2647
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
Thanks for doing this.
I believe test_sema also has this problem, in addition to
test_fifo/test_lifo.
--
Andrew Boie
Staff Engineer - EOS Zephyr
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Thanks for doing this.
I believe test_sema also has this problem, in addition to
test_fifo/test_lifo.
--
Andrew Boie
Staff Engineer - EOS Zephyr
Intel Open Source Technology Center
|
By
Boie, Andrew P
·
#2646
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
Thanks. Looks like we have everything in place then.
Cheers,
--
Maciek Borzecki
Thanks. Looks like we have everything in place then.
Cheers,
--
Maciek Borzecki
|
By
Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...>
·
#2645
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
I have pushed it to gerrit:
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/c/1142/
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/c/1143/
I have pushed it to gerrit:
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/c/1142/
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/c/1143/
|
By
Yannis Damigos
·
#2644
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
also look at
include/misc/stack.h
for Stack usage analysis helpers
Anas
also look at
include/misc/stack.h
for Stack usage analysis helpers
Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#2643
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
Can you point me to the patch? I can't see it in the original email in
the thread (save my email doing funky stuff :)
Thanks
Can you point me to the patch? I can't see it in the original email in
the thread (save my email doing funky stuff :)
Thanks
|
By
Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <inaky.perez-gonzalez@...>
·
#2642
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
That part is already in the kernel: CONFIG_INIT_STACKS fills the stacks
with 0xaa when threads are initialized.
That part is already in the kernel: CONFIG_INIT_STACKS fills the stacks
with 0xaa when threads are initialized.
|
By
Benjamin Walsh <benjamin.walsh@...>
·
#2641
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
Hey Yannis,
By
Kalowsky, Daniel <daniel.kalowsky@...>
·
#2640
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
<maciek.borzecki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Now that I've seen the patch it got me thinking. What if we added an
opt-in debug code for fiber/tasks that helped to measure stack usage?
This could be something
<maciek.borzecki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Now that I've seen the patch it got me thinking. What if we added an
opt-in debug code for fiber/tasks that helped to measure stack usage?
This could be something
|
By
Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...>
·
#2639
·
|
|
Re: RFC: extend sanitycheck testcase filtering expressiveness
I briefly considered this approach but after doing some reading concluded it was unsafe.
http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201206/eval_really_is_dangerous.html
Andrew
I briefly considered this approach but after doing some reading concluded it was unsafe.
http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201206/eval_really_is_dangerous.html
Andrew
|
By
Boie, Andrew P
·
#2638
·
|
|
Re: Sanity check and test cases
Hi,
<giannis.damigos(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You can post the patch and add me for review. From what I've seen,
there's ~10 tests that fail under sanitycheck with SRAM overflow from
hundreds of bytes, to
Hi,
<giannis.damigos(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You can post the patch and add me for review. From what I've seen,
there's ~10 tests that fail under sanitycheck with SRAM overflow from
hundreds of bytes, to
|
By
Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...>
·
#2637
·
|