|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4868 : unified: Add tickless idle support for x86
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4866 : unified: Remove unused
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4868 : unified: Add tickless idle support for x86
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4866 : unified: Remove unused
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#3764
·
|
|
Re: zoap architecture question...
Hi,
Vinicius can say more, but there was an early POC on top of the new stack a few weeks back, the plan is to move to new IP stack for 1.6 and ASAP. https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-818
Hi,
Vinicius can say more, but there was an early POC on top of the new stack a few weeks back, the plan is to move to new IP stack for 1.6 and ASAP. https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-818
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#3762
·
|
|
Data to send linux host from Zephyr app
Hi Dev team,
Currently i am working one POC.
Requirement is to send the raw data from zephyr app using qemu which
convert UDP and other linux host side application listening on same UDP
port to
Hi Dev team,
Currently i am working one POC.
Requirement is to send the raw data from zephyr app using qemu which
convert UDP and other linux host side application listening on same UDP
port to
|
By
Giribabu Gogineni <giribabu02061983@...>
·
#3763
·
|
|
Re: zoap architecture question...
Hi Vinicius
<vinicius.gomes(a)intel.com> wrote:
Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to explain some of the
relevant back ground issues.
Understood ;-)
... just two more questions...
- What
Hi Vinicius
<vinicius.gomes(a)intel.com> wrote:
Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to explain some of the
relevant back ground issues.
Understood ;-)
... just two more questions...
- What
|
By
Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@...>
·
#3761
·
|
|
Re: zepyr application to write on to UDP socket
Hi Giribabu,
do you mean IP header when you say "extra headers"?
If yes, then transferring raw UDP data without IP header is not
possible with current SLIP driver. You need to write your own
Hi Giribabu,
do you mean IP header when you say "extra headers"?
If yes, then transferring raw UDP data without IP header is not
possible with current SLIP driver. You need to write your own
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#3760
·
|
|
Re: Porting to Cortex-M0+
That's OK, I can do it.
Piotr
That's OK, I can do it.
Piotr
|
By
Piotr Mienkowski <piotr.mienkowski@...>
·
#3759
·
|
|
Re: [RFC]PWM API Update
Hi all,
Thank you for your feedback and suggestions on this RFC.
I summarized what were discussed and would like to conclude this RFC.
There will be two APIs in include/pwm.h:
static inline int
Hi all,
Thank you for your feedback and suggestions on this RFC.
I summarized what were discussed and would like to conclude this RFC.
There will be two APIs in include/pwm.h:
static inline int
|
By
Liu, Baohong
·
#3758
·
|
|
Re: RFC: async I/O facility: "zpoll" API
As promised, the prototype is up for review here:
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4871 zconfig.h: Add DEFINED() macro for expresion-legal ifdef-checking
As promised, the prototype is up for review here:
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4871 zconfig.h: Add DEFINED() macro for expresion-legal ifdef-checking
|
By
Andy Ross
·
#3757
·
|
|
Re: RFC: async I/O facility: "zpoll" API
Benjamin Walsh wrote:
Will do. I'm calling it zpoll only because the semantics aren't
exactly equivalent to unix poll and I didn't want to address the
confusion. But that naming is probably
Benjamin Walsh wrote:
Will do. I'm calling it zpoll only because the semantics aren't
exactly equivalent to unix poll and I didn't want to address the
confusion. But that naming is probably
|
By
Andy Ross
·
#3756
·
|
|
Daily JIRA Digest
NEW JIRA items within last 24 hours: 5
[ZEP-945] Add framework for provisioning-sytle device configuration
https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-945
[ZEP-938]
NEW JIRA items within last 24 hours: 5
[ZEP-945] Add framework for provisioning-sytle device configuration
https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-945
[ZEP-938]
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#3755
·
|
|
Re: RFC: async I/O facility: "zpoll" API
OK, this is _very_ interesting. We were thinking of actuatlly
implementing a 'wait on multiple objects' in the kernel rather than just
this 'semaphore group' we currently have (for backwards
OK, this is _very_ interesting. We were thinking of actuatlly
implementing a 'wait on multiple objects' in the kernel rather than just
this 'semaphore group' we currently have (for backwards
|
By
Benjamin Walsh <benjamin.walsh@...>
·
#3754
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4852 : Bluetooth: Controller: Use net_buf for HCI RX
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4853 : Bluetooth: init: Add
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4852 : Bluetooth: Controller: Use net_buf for HCI RX
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/4853 : Bluetooth: init: Add
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#3753
·
|
|
Re: Porting to Cortex-M0+
Why don’t you submit the code for review to at least let us move that bit along while we figure out the issues with Atmel.
- k
Why don’t you submit the code for review to at least let us move that bit along while we figure out the issues with Atmel.
- k
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#3752
·
|
|
Re: Galileo Gen 1 GPIO
Hi Gottfried,
Using this Cypress chip is a mandatory support as a low level pinmuxing
driver
if you want to configure and use the hardware pins, the ones exposed as
arduino compatible.
Your use
Hi Gottfried,
Using this Cypress chip is a mandatory support as a low level pinmuxing
driver
if you want to configure and use the hardware pins, the ones exposed as
arduino compatible.
Your use
|
By
Tomasz Bursztyka
·
#3751
·
|
|
Re: RFC: async I/O facility: "zpoll" API
Joseph, Jithu wrote:
Right. It's made from the system work queue, the same thread that
handles {nano,k}_work_submit entries. The signal call is typically
going to be made from interrupt context,
Joseph, Jithu wrote:
Right. It's made from the system work queue, the same thread that
handles {nano,k}_work_submit entries. The signal call is typically
going to be made from interrupt context,
|
By
Andy Ross
·
#3750
·
|
|
Re: Galileo Gen 1 GPIO
Tomasz,
Thanks for your answer.Like Fabio I also want to use Galieo v1 board but
not really certain about your answer and what
type of restrictions you are talking about.Myself I will not use Cypress
Tomasz,
Thanks for your answer.Like Fabio I also want to use Galieo v1 board but
not really certain about your answer and what
type of restrictions you are talking about.Myself I will not use Cypress
|
By
Gottfried F. Zojer
·
#3749
·
|
|
Re: zoap architecture question...
Hi,
Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft(a)gmail.com> writes:
I agree that this has a cost in repeated code.
Just a little background: when I wrote sol-coap, for the Soletta
project, I took the
Hi,
Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft(a)gmail.com> writes:
I agree that this has a cost in repeated code.
Just a little background: when I wrote sol-coap, for the Soletta
project, I took the
|
By
Vinicius Costa Gomes
·
#3748
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Extension to External Interrupt API
By
Maureen Helm
·
#3747
·
|
|
Re: zepyr application to write on to UDP socket
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for the feedback.
When we use echo client running on QEMU using SLIP and we have server
application running on linux host, we receive the extra headers along with
data.
Our
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for the feedback.
When we use echo client running on QEMU using SLIP and we have server
application running on linux host, we receive the extra headers along with
data.
Our
|
By
Giribabu Gogineni <giribabu02061983@...>
·
#3746
·
|
|
Re: zoap architecture question...
On 19 September 2016 at 19:37, Vinicius Costa Gomes
<vinicius.gomes(a)intel.com> wrote:
Hi, Thanks for responding. Its good to see coap moving forward in zephyr.
> The plan is that the error
On 19 September 2016 at 19:37, Vinicius Costa Gomes
<vinicius.gomes(a)intel.com> wrote:
Hi, Thanks for responding. Its good to see coap moving forward in zephyr.
> The plan is that the error
|
By
Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@...>
·
#3745
·
|