Hello, After playing a bit with k_timer and the expiry and stop callbacks, I realize that there is no way to manipulate application specific data inside the callbacks. These routines are implemented

Hi tomasz and mahendra what #define to be used in gpio_pin_configure to mask and unmask gpio interrupt ? can you help me with an example ? tomasz.bursztyka(a)linux.intel.com> wrote:

NEW within last 24 hours: - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8905 : boards: arm: Refactor the GPIO and UART dependencies - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8894 : tests: spi_test: refactor and

Hi, The second one. Always use the Zephyr GPIO API, so include/gpio.h Tomasz

Hi In our project we have connected a gpio line as interrupt from a peripheral to the quark controller. In zephyr 1.6 So from the application level to mask and unmask gpio interrupts can I use

NEW within last 24 hours: - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8879 : iot/dns: Update DNS client private routines - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8878 : iot/dns: Introduce the dns_context

NEW within last 24 hours: - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8835 : net: l2: ethernet: Handle Ethernet II full frame relevantly - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8852 : arch: arm: Add support

Hi all, Today a new IC by Nordic Semiconductor, the nRF52840, has been announced. We also pushed preliminary support for both the IC and the Preview Development Kit (PDK PCA10056) to gerrit in

Responding to my own post - clearly KERNEL_VERSION_NUMBER is the wrong macro. It seems like KERNELVERSION is supposed to be the correct one for these macros? A little confusing. Anyway, I just

Hi, I noticed that a new Zephyr version was tagged, 1.6.0. I am confused a little bit by the version number though: Is it really Version 1.6.0? Or 0.1.6? If you look at (and I tested this with a

Noticed a typo in my earlier reply, corrected inline Thanks Jithu Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 10:49 AM To: Mahendravarman Rajarao (RBEI/EAA3) <Mahendravarman.Rajarao(a)in.bosch.com>;

Please find the answers below : No - application code need not do that. It is enough that the apps define CONFIG_UART_CONSOLE_ON_DEV_NAME if they want to override the default console

NEW within last 24 hours: - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8819 : arc: Add cc to clobber list for sleep instruction - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8818 : doc: adapt source tree for new

Hi Please help on the following In the latest zephyr 1.6 release , under samples\usb\console folder, the example is given to show the console output coming to USB UART. dev =

NEW within last 24 hours: - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8813 : driver: ethernet: adds reset signal to enc28j60 driver - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8812 : tests: import stack

Hi, I am pleased to announce that we have tagged Zephyr 1.6.0, merge window for 1.7 is now open. Thanks to all who participated and made this release happen, this was a true collaborative effort up

NEW within last 24 hours: - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8785 : arm: Refactor irq_lock inline asm formatting. - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8784 : arm: Refactor cortex-m4 irq_lock tmp

NEW within last 24 hours: - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8761 : kernel: Guarantee the order of execution of irq_lock() - https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/8754 : samples/drivers: Add Beetle

Hi, Looking at an issue Carles and others have been chasing it appears that the ARM irq_lock() implementation is broken. The absence of a memory clobber allows the compiler to reorder it relative to