|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12965 : loop-slip-tap.sh: pass arguments to tunslip6
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12964 : test_sleep: replacing depreciated
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12965 : loop-slip-tap.sh: pass arguments to tunslip6
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12964 : test_sleep: replacing depreciated
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#443
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12957 : net: shell: conn: Dump local/remote ports for contexts.
UPDATED within last 24 hours:
-
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12957 : net: shell: conn: Dump local/remote ports for contexts.
UPDATED within last 24 hours:
-
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#442
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] HEADS UP: s/net_nbuf/net_pkt and separation from net_buf
Hello Tomasz,
Thanks for coming forward with this patchset. I eyeballed first 5-6
patches in the set, and just did a smoke test of applying them one by
one and making sure echo_server works. I
Hello Tomasz,
Thanks for coming forward with this patchset. I eyeballed first 5-6
patches in the set, and just did a smoke test of applying them one by
one and making sure echo_server works. I
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#441
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12951 : misc: Support left-justification in printk()
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12948 : tests: sprintf: cleanup to work with
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12951 : misc: Support left-justification in printk()
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12948 : tests: sprintf: cleanup to work with
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#440
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12939 : tests: kernel: add tickless test
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12936 : xtensa port: Added documentation for xt-sim
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12939 : tests: kernel: add tickless test
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12936 : xtensa port: Added documentation for xt-sim
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#439
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12916 : Merge net branch into master
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12915 : DRAFT net: service: Track also individual entity
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12916 : Merge net branch into master
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12915 : DRAFT net: service: Track also individual entity
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#438
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9 32bit support
Thanks. I will have a try with it.
Thanks. I will have a try with it.
|
By
Jammy Zhou
·
#437
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9 32bit support
See:
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/gitweb?p=meta-zephyr-sdk.git;a=blob;f=README.md
See:
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/gitweb?p=meta-zephyr-sdk.git;a=blob;f=README.md
|
By
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...>
·
#436
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9 32bit support
Sounds a good idea to me. It will be quite helpful if we can get it documented for how the SDK is generated. It can also be a good base to generate a customized SDK with some vendor specific additions
Sounds a good idea to me. It will be quite helpful if we can get it documented for how the SDK is generated. It can also be a good base to generate a customized SDK with some vendor specific additions
|
By
Jammy Zhou
·
#435
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Replacing Make/Kbuild with CMake
Hi, all,
About scons, I heard of an project_generator wrote by python, support different IDEs, might be helpful.
And also there is a platform calledplatformIO
Hi, all,
About scons, I heard of an project_generator wrote by python, support different IDEs, might be helpful.
And also there is a platform calledplatformIO
|
By
Huaqi Fang
·
#434
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9 32bit support
Perhaps it would help to make it clearer where the SDK comes from and how it gets built. It's based on openembedded, and that build system should be fairly portable. This would allow people to build
Perhaps it would help to make it clearer where the SDK comes from and how it gets built. It's based on openembedded, and that build system should be fairly portable. This would allow people to build
|
By
David Brown
·
#433
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9 32bit support
There's quite a bit in the SDK. In addition to the toolchains for all
of the targets, it has python (both 2 and 3), flex, openocd, openssl,
the device tree tools, qemu built for all of the supported
There's quite a bit in the SDK. In addition to the toolchains for all
of the targets, it has python (both 2 and 3), flex, openocd, openssl,
the device tree tools, qemu built for all of the supported
|
By
David Brown
·
#432
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9 32bit support
If there is no plan to enable 32bit support anymore, I would suggest to forbid the installation and print out some warning message (e.g, "64bit system should be used with Zephyr SDK 0.9") when execute
If there is no plan to enable 32bit support anymore, I would suggest to forbid the installation and print out some warning message (e.g, "64bit system should be used with Zephyr SDK 0.9") when execute
|
By
Jammy Zhou
·
#431
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Network service monitoring support
Not really, but learning from that experience :)
Jukka
Not really, but learning from that experience :)
Jukka
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#430
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12895 : DRAFT net: Add service management support
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12896 : DRAFT net: Generate network service
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12895 : DRAFT net: Add service management support
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/12896 : DRAFT net: Generate network service
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#429
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Network service monitoring support
Hi Jukka,
Bringing Connman to Zephyr! :)
Tomasz
Hi Jukka,
Bringing Connman to Zephyr! :)
Tomasz
|
By
Tomasz Bursztyka
·
#428
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Replacing Make/Kbuild with CMake
Hi,
This is very good news! And the reasons are spot on. Thanks for pushing this.
Sakari
Hi,
This is very good news! And the reasons are spot on. Thanks for pushing this.
Sakari
|
By
Poussa, Sakari
·
#427
·
|
|
[RFC] Network service monitoring support
Hi,
I just sent network service monitoring support for review, see it here
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/q/topic:service
or here
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/c/12895/
The service
Hi,
I just sent network service monitoring support for review, see it here
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/q/topic:service
or here
https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/#/c/12895/
The service
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#426
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Replacing Make/Kbuild with CMake
Hi Carles,
I wasn't present at the conversations where the build system change was discussed, but was Meson (http://mesonbuild.com/) considered?
I don't have personal experience using it, but from
Hi Carles,
I wasn't present at the conversations where the build system change was discussed, but was Meson (http://mesonbuild.com/) considered?
I don't have personal experience using it, but from
|
By
Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...>
·
#425
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Replacing Make/Kbuild with CMake
Not following why this would impact CI and why we are concerned about it in this context, CI as we do it right has more issues than the underlying build tool. We need to come to a point where we
Not following why this would impact CI and why we are concerned about it in this context, CI as we do it right has more issues than the underlying build tool. We need to come to a point where we
|
By
Anas Nashif
·
#424
·
|