|
Re: uint32_t typedef differences causes issues
Thought that myself, but with %u you get:
In file included from
Thought that myself, but with %u you get:
In file included from
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#4500
·
|
|
Re: uint32_t typedef differences causes issues
Since the type is 'uint32_t' rather than 'unsigned' the correct specifier is:
PRIu32
e.g.
#include <stdint.h>
printf("blah %" PRIu32 " more blah", v);
Cheers
/Marcus
Since the type is 'uint32_t' rather than 'unsigned' the correct specifier is:
PRIu32
e.g.
#include <stdint.h>
printf("blah %" PRIu32 " more blah", v);
Cheers
/Marcus
|
By
Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@...>
·
#4499
·
|
|
Re: uint32_t typedef differences causes issues
Hi Kumar,
The right format specifier for unsigned integers is %u and not %d, so as
far as I see that's the issue and using %u should make the error go
away.
Johan
Hi Kumar,
The right format specifier for unsigned integers is %u and not %d, so as
far as I see that's the issue and using %u should make the error go
away.
Johan
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#4498
·
|
|
Re: uint32_t typedef differences causes issues
Hi,
[Second attempt at responding, my arm email address seems to have
triggered a moderator approval, sorry about the duplication for those
of you that got a direct reply.]
This is because the code
Hi,
[Second attempt at responding, my arm email address seems to have
triggered a moderator approval, sorry about the duplication for those
of you that got a direct reply.]
This is because the code
|
By
Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@...>
·
#4497
·
|
|
Re: uint32_t typedef differences causes issues
Hi, This is because the code is using the wrong format specifier, see JIRA-1181
Cheers
/Marcus
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
Hi, This is because the code is using the wrong format specifier, see JIRA-1181
Cheers
/Marcus
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
|
By
Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@...>
·
#4503
·
|
|
uint32_t typedef differences causes issues
It looks like newlib and our mini libc define uint32_t differently and this causes issues with the printf format warning from gcc. We get things
It looks like newlib and our mini libc define uint32_t differently and this causes issues with the printf format warning from gcc. We get things
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#4496
·
|
|
Re: Any plan for OTA support?
Hi David,
If I’m not mistaken the Mynewt bootloader includes support for serial “DFU” (more like app image management and transfer). Are you planning to port that as well as part of the mcuboot
Hi David,
If I’m not mistaken the Mynewt bootloader includes support for serial “DFU” (more like app image management and transfer). Are you planning to port that as well as part of the mcuboot
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#4495
·
|
|
Re: [RFC]DMA API Update
[...]
So, when I add DMA support to my uart, everyone project that uses a
UART, or device attached through a UART, needs know the magic device
specific configuration required and add it their
[...]
So, when I add DMA support to my uart, everyone project that uses a
UART, or device attached through a UART, needs know the magic device
specific configuration required and add it their
|
By
Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <tixy@...>
·
#4494
·
|
|
[USB] composite device
Hello, is anybody tried to realize composite USB-device? Any hints? Examples?
Thank you.
Hello, is anybody tried to realize composite USB-device? Any hints? Examples?
Thank you.
|
By
Alexey Belyaev <BeliaevAV@...>
·
#4493
·
|
|
Re: Suggestions for getting started
Which STM32 discovery board do you have, this is possibly the best starting point to try and get zephyr up and running.
What kinda of work or code have you developed in the past? Any particular area
Which STM32 discovery board do you have, this is possibly the best starting point to try and get zephyr up and running.
What kinda of work or code have you developed in the past? Any particular area
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#4492
·
|
|
Re: [RFC]DMA API Update
The DMA API can be used by drivers for DMA operations
IMO, ideally the SPI driver should call the DMA API to implement the DMA support.
However, I think this is up to the driver to decide to use the
The DMA API can be used by drivers for DMA operations
IMO, ideally the SPI driver should call the DMA API to implement the DMA support.
However, I think this is up to the driver to decide to use the
|
By
Liu, Baohong
·
#4491
·
|
|
Re: [RFC]DMA API Update
Just to clarify my previous answer which is meant to say that there are existing
usage cases a driver use API from another driver. (e.g some sensor drivers uses
I2C driver API)
For the channel
Just to clarify my previous answer which is meant to say that there are existing
usage cases a driver use API from another driver. (e.g some sensor drivers uses
I2C driver API)
For the channel
|
By
Liu, Baohong
·
#4490
·
|
|
Re: [RFC]DMA API Update
Baohong,
By
Tseng, Kuo-Lang <kuo-lang.tseng@...>
·
#4489
·
|
|
SSH on Galileo
Dear Sirs,
Does Zephyr have SSH support?
Thank you.
Dear Sirs,
Does Zephyr have SSH support?
Thank you.
|
By
Fábio Iaione <fabio.iaione at gmail.com...>
·
#4488
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr on STM32F042/072/405 with USB?
Hi Erwan,
well, it wasn't too hard. Almost everything is already implemented in
the STM Cube drivers and only a little bit of glue code was needed.
I've only implemented the functions needed by the
Hi Erwan,
well, it wasn't too hard. Almost everything is already implemented in
the STM Cube drivers and only a little bit of glue code was needed.
I've only implemented the functions needed by the
|
By
Christer Weinigel
·
#4487
·
|
|
Re: Any plan for OTA support?
We are working on the Mynewt bootloader (which is going to be its own
project, called mcuboot). I have the OTA update as something that needs to
be done, but I'm not aware of currently plans to
We are working on the Mynewt bootloader (which is going to be its own
project, called mcuboot). I have the OTA update as something that needs to
be done, but I'm not aware of currently plans to
|
By
David Brown
·
#4486
·
|
|
Suggestions for getting started
Hi All,
Hope everybody is doing well.
I recently joined the zephyr devel mailing list and going through the
documentation and other starters stuffs as being new to open source
development.
I want
Hi All,
Hope everybody is doing well.
I recently joined the zephyr devel mailing list and going through the
documentation and other starters stuffs as being new to open source
development.
I want
|
By
Abhinav Misra
·
#4485
·
|
|
Re: RFC: ieee802154 radio api
Hi Johann,
Ok sound like it could use the actual RAW use of the driver.
So you would need 2 function:
- one returning the supported modes
- one running the test with requested mode as you
Hi Johann,
Ok sound like it could use the actual RAW use of the driver.
So you would need 2 function:
- one returning the supported modes
- one running the test with requested mode as you
|
By
Tomasz Bursztyka
·
#4484
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] STM32 pinmux - simplify pinmux logic
Hi Erwan,
It looks quite similar, if I understood this correctly, he's also added
some macros to combine the pull up/pull down/function with the alternate
function in one
Hi Erwan,
It looks quite similar, if I understood this correctly, he's also added
some macros to combine the pull up/pull down/function with the alternate
function in one
|
By
Christer Weinigel
·
#4483
·
|
|
Re: RFC: ieee802154 radio api
Hi Tomasz,
No, it just for the PHY (RF Testing, simular to BT DTM, e.g.
DTM_PKT_PRBS9 or CARRIER_TEST ...). It would also needs a shell command.
--
Best Regards,
Johann Fischer
Hi Tomasz,
No, it just for the PHY (RF Testing, simular to BT DTM, e.g.
DTM_PKT_PRBS9 or CARRIER_TEST ...). It would also needs a shell command.
--
Best Regards,
Johann Fischer
|
By
Johann Fischer
·
#4482
·
|