|
Re: [Zephyr-users] assertion fail in nordic nrf5 i2c driver
Carles, I am trying to use 1.13 and am having some issues. I can build hello_world, but when i tried to build anything with i2c, I have issues. ( drivers__i2c was created without source
Carles, I am trying to use 1.13 and am having some issues. I can build hello_world, but when i tried to build anything with i2c, I have issues. ( drivers__i2c was created without source
|
By
Manu R
·
#5228
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] assertion fail in nordic nrf5 i2c driver
Carles, appreciate the response.
That was definitely one of my experiments to try.
However, we have had a relatively stable base with r1.12 and I am not sure we can change to 1.13 without some
Carles, appreciate the response.
That was definitely one of my experiments to try.
However, we have had a relatively stable base with r1.12 and I am not sure we can change to 1.13 without some
|
By
Manu R
·
#5227
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] assertion fail in nordic nrf5 i2c driver
Hi Manu,
The I2C driver has since been completely rewritten to use nrfx, our common driver codebase.
Would it be possible for you to try with current master (or at least 1.13) to see if you still
Hi Manu,
The I2C driver has since been completely rewritten to use nrfx, our common driver codebase.
Would it be possible for you to try with current master (or at least 1.13) to see if you still
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#5226
·
|
|
Strange power consumption _after_ I2C transactions on nrf52840
Hi All,
We have a custom board with a nrf52840 and multiple I2C devices( accel, pressure, etc).
We noticed that anytime we do an I2C transaction ( reads in particular), the current draw is abnormally
Hi All,
We have a custom board with a nrf52840 and multiple I2C devices( accel, pressure, etc).
We noticed that anytime we do an I2C transaction ( reads in particular), the current draw is abnormally
|
By
Manu R
·
#5225
·
|
|
cant read device using i2c sample code on nrf52
I'm trying to run the sample i2c code from samples/drivers/i2c_fujitsu_fram on my board.
I've tweaked the address to use the i2c address of my device, and am trying to read the who_am_i register, but
I'm trying to run the sample i2c code from samples/drivers/i2c_fujitsu_fram on my board.
I've tweaked the address to use the i2c address of my device, and am trying to read the who_am_i register, but
|
By
gurpreet+zephy@...
·
#5224
·
|
|
assertion fail in nordic nrf5 i2c driver
Hi all,
I am using a lis2dh12 with a nrf52840, and am on occasion seeing an assertion.
It happens in the i2c_nrf5_read
err=0 txd=0 rxd=0 stopped=0 errsrc=0x0
ASSERTION FAIL [data->stopped] @
Hi all,
I am using a lis2dh12 with a nrf52840, and am on occasion seeing an assertion.
It happens in the i2c_nrf5_read
err=0 txd=0 rxd=0 stopped=0 errsrc=0x0
ASSERTION FAIL [data->stopped] @
|
By
Manu R
·
#5223
·
|
|
Re: HCI_UART
Charles,
Thank you very much for the advice, I figured out that I built the .hex file with the incorrect parameters:
cmake -DBOARD=nrf52840_pca10059 ../..
When I needed:
cmake
Charles,
Thank you very much for the advice, I figured out that I built the .hex file with the incorrect parameters:
cmake -DBOARD=nrf52840_pca10059 ../..
When I needed:
cmake
|
By
Cale Collins <ccollins@...>
·
#5222
·
|
|
Re: Bluetooth: about latest Kernel OOPS
Hi Carles,
Oh !! That's Great news !!
Hi Carles,
Oh !! That's Great news !!
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#5221
·
|
|
Re: Choosing Tx Buffers in BLE stack
Note that if you do not own a BLE sniffer you can still use a Nordic board to sniff traffic over the air:
https://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/Products/Bluetooth-low-energy/nRF-Sniffer
Carles
Note that if you do not own a BLE sniffer you can still use a Nordic board to sniff traffic over the air:
https://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/Products/Bluetooth-low-energy/nRF-Sniffer
Carles
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#5220
·
|
|
Re: Choosing Tx Buffers in BLE stack
Do you have a sniffer trace you can send to me email?
It appears the peer is not responding to a control procedure.
-Vinayak
Do you have a sniffer trace you can send to me email?
It appears the peer is not responding to a control procedure.
-Vinayak
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#5219
·
|
|
Re: Bluetooth: about latest Kernel OOPS
Fix is now merged: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/10391
Fix is now merged: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/10391
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#5218
·
|
|
Re: Bluetooth: about latest Kernel OOPS
Hi Vikrant,
It appears a recent merged PR has introduced regression. https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/10289
I am analysing the issue, meanwhile you can revert the said commit so as
Hi Vikrant,
It appears a recent merged PR has introduced regression. https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/10289
I am analysing the issue, meanwhile you can revert the said commit so as
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#5217
·
|
|
Bluetooth: about latest Kernel OOPS
Hi,
Today I synced my local repo with Zephyr master & while testing with
Bluetooth Mesh App I got following Kernel OOPS:
***** Kernel OOPS! *****
Hi,
Today I synced my local repo with Zephyr master & while testing with
Bluetooth Mesh App I got following Kernel OOPS:
***** Kernel OOPS! *****
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#5216
·
|
|
Type-C PD (TCPC / TCPM)
Hi,
Checking in if anyone has been looking at generic USB Type-C PD support?
There are obviously various ways this is dealt with in products on the market,
some uses more primitive PHY's + a big
Hi,
Checking in if anyone has been looking at generic USB Type-C PD support?
There are obviously various ways this is dealt with in products on the market,
some uses more primitive PHY's + a big
|
By
david <david@...>
·
#5215
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] WSL builds now functional
Good to know that we can work on WSL
On Thursday, 4 October, 2018, 2:01:30 PM IST, Cufi, Carles <carles.cufi@...> wrote:
Good to know that we can work on WSL
On Thursday, 4 October, 2018, 2:01:30 PM IST, Cufi, Carles <carles.cufi@...> wrote:
|
By
Saurabh Pandey <saurabh_0711@...>
·
#5214
·
|
|
Re: nrf52840 dongle
I think you can start form looking at the ticketNordic PCA10059 support without additional Seeger debugger https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/9055 and related PRsAs you can see what
I think you can start form looking at the ticketNordic PCA10059 support without additional Seeger debugger https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/9055 and related PRsAs you can see what
|
By
Puzdrowski, Andrzej
·
#5213
·
|
|
Re: Benchmarking of Real-Time Operating Systems for Internet of Things Devices
Hi Julien,
We've recently published a set of papers considering the evaluation of OS for wearable computing. It might be worth checking some of them, once some wearable solutions are pretty
Hi Julien,
We've recently published a set of papers considering the evaluation of OS for wearable computing. It might be worth checking some of them, once some wearable solutions are pretty
|
By
Vicente Amorim <vjpamorim@...>
·
#5212
·
|
|
Re: HCI_UART
Good point.
We have details about this in the nRF5x Segger page:
https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/tools/nordic_segger.html#usb-cdc-acm-serial-port-setup
Carles
Good point.
We have details about this in the nRF5x Segger page:
https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/tools/nordic_segger.html#usb-cdc-acm-serial-port-setup
Carles
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#5211
·
|
|
Re: Benchmarking of Real-Time Operating Systems for Internet of Things Devices
Hi Julien,
if you are interested in measuring networking performance, then there
is a iPerf 2.x client/server sample application in Zephyr that you can
use for this purpose. See samples/net/zperf
Hi Julien,
if you are interested in measuring networking performance, then there
is a iPerf 2.x client/server sample application in Zephyr that you can
use for this purpose. See samples/net/zperf
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#5210
·
|
|
Re: Benchmarking of Real-Time Operating Systems for Internet of Things Devices
Hi,
I am a professor at federal university in Brazil. I am glad to see initiatives to evaluate and comparing “RTOSes” master thesis. It seems to be a great path to go. I would suggest you to
Hi,
I am a professor at federal university in Brazil. I am glad to see initiatives to evaluate and comparing “RTOSes” master thesis. It seems to be a great path to go. I would suggest you to
|
By
Rodrigo Peixoto
·
#5209
·
|