|
Re: samples: BLE Mesh : finding possibi =?utf-8?Q?lities_to_optimise_onoff_level_lighting_vnd_app_further_??=
Hi, vikrant,
You can go here: https://zephyrproject.slack.com/messages/C18PLHN8H/convo/C18PLHN8H-1547649579.774500/?cdn_fallback=1
in general channel, talk to Johan Hedberg by @jhe, who's
Hi, vikrant,
You can go here: https://zephyrproject.slack.com/messages/C18PLHN8H/convo/C18PLHN8H-1547649579.774500/?cdn_fallback=1
in general channel, talk to Johan Hedberg by @jhe, who's
|
By
wxzzzh
·
#5602
·
|
|
Re: Deprecating and removing net-app based APIs
Hello,
"Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
+1 for deprecation, -1 for removal in 1.14. 1.14 is supposed to be LTS
release, and we shouldn't leave users who used prior versions
Hello,
"Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
+1 for deprecation, -1 for removal in 1.14. 1.14 is supposed to be LTS
release, and we shouldn't leave users who used prior versions
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#5601
·
|
|
Dev Review Meeting Agenda (Jan 17, 2019)
Here are the discussion items for today’s meeting, if you have any others let me know:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/labels/dev-review
* Target Capabilities / Board Directory Layout
Here are the discussion items for today’s meeting, if you have any others let me know:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/labels/dev-review
* Target Capabilities / Board Directory Layout
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#5600
·
|
|
samples: BLE Mesh : finding possibilities to optimise onoff_level_lighting_vnd_app further ?
Hello,
Available Bluetooth Mesh App layers (which are based on resp. Semiconductor
manufacture BLE Mesh stack) are black boxes. So we can't mimic what they
have implemented.
So is there
Hello,
Available Bluetooth Mesh App layers (which are based on resp. Semiconductor
manufacture BLE Mesh stack) are black boxes. So we can't mimic what they
have implemented.
So is there
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#5599
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
Den 2019-01-16 kl. 18:31, skrev Andy Ross:
By "broadly-used industry extensions" you mean "gcc extensions" I guess?
I did a quick test using some other C compilers I
Den 2019-01-16 kl. 18:31, skrev Andy Ross:
By "broadly-used industry extensions" you mean "gcc extensions" I guess?
I did a quick test using some other C compilers I
|
By
Thomas Törnblom <thomas.tornblom@...>
·
#5598
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
Thomas Törnblom wrote:
And we'd never use this trick in C++ for that reason. :)
I'd personally prefer to see this done via rework that doesn't
introduce needless memory. I know I mocked it, but
Thomas Törnblom wrote:
And we'd never use this trick in C++ for that reason. :)
I'd personally prefer to see this done via rework that doesn't
introduce needless memory. I know I mocked it, but
|
By
Andy Ross
·
#5597
·
|
|
Deprecating and removing net-app based APIs
Hi all,
I sent a PR#12506 [1] that marks these APIs as deprecated:
* net-app
* HTTP server / client
* Websocket
* SNTP
The idea is that these APIs would eventually be removed from
Hi all,
I sent a PR#12506 [1] that marks these APIs as deprecated:
* net-app
* HTTP server / client
* Websocket
* SNTP
The idea is that these APIs would eventually be removed from
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#5596
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
Den 2019-01-15 kl. 17:45, skrev Andy Ross:
Would there be a problem adding a single anonymous member to this to make it standards compliant?
After all, in C++ empty
Den 2019-01-15 kl. 17:45, skrev Andy Ross:
Would there be a problem adding a single anonymous member to this to make it standards compliant?
After all, in C++ empty
|
By
Thomas Törnblom <thomas.tornblom@...>
·
#5595
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
Hi,
I'm with Thomas, this is a GCC extension we should rely on them.
Thumbs up
Literal zero is GCC extension and about flexible array "[]" it can be
used *only* as the last element in a struct (and
Hi,
I'm with Thomas, this is a GCC extension we should rely on them.
Thumbs up
Literal zero is GCC extension and about flexible array "[]" it can be
used *only* as the last element in a struct (and
|
By
Flavio Ceolin
·
#5594
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
In order:
1. Empty structs are really useful, for example the spot you're noticing that allows arch code to define its own set of private data, which might be zero-length. Obviously
In order:
1. Empty structs are really useful, for example the spot you're noticing that allows arch code to define its own set of private data, which might be zero-length. Obviously
|
By
Andy Ross
·
#5593
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
Yeah, I have a ton of sympathy for poor Flavio having to deal with all
these conflicting rules and requirements, but not a lot for this
particular rule that was clearly solved by the C standards
Yeah, I have a ton of sympathy for poor Flavio having to deal with all
these conflicting rules and requirements, but not a lot for this
particular rule that was clearly solved by the C standards
|
By
Andy Ross
·
#5592
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
"Flavio Ceolin" <flavio.ceolin@...> wrote:
Anonymous unions are important part of the C language. An obvious
solution to the problem is switching to the C11 standard.
[]
--
Best
"Flavio Ceolin" <flavio.ceolin@...> wrote:
Anonymous unions are important part of the C language. An obvious
solution to the problem is switching to the C11 standard.
[]
--
Best
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#5591
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
While on the subject of language compliance, what about the frequent usage of non-standard gcc extensions that limits portability?
I've started looking at making IAR Embedded Workbench a
While on the subject of language compliance, what about the frequent usage of non-standard gcc extensions that limits portability?
I've started looking at making IAR Embedded Workbench a
|
By
thomas.tornblom@...
·
#5590
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
Hi Peter,
I've given my opnion there :)
Flavio Ceolin
Hi Peter,
I've given my opnion there :)
Flavio Ceolin
|
By
Flavio Ceolin
·
#5589
·
|
|
Re: RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
I don't have a solution, but since the question came up I am interested in any reaction to https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/9552#issuecomment-449718078 since that's relevant to the
I don't have a solution, but since the question came up I am interested in any reaction to https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/9552#issuecomment-449718078 since that's relevant to the
|
By
Peter A. Bigot
·
#5588
·
|
|
RFC - C99 issue regarding unnamed union/structs
Hi guys,
One problem with have in Zephyr regarding C99 is that we are using a lot
of unnamed struct/unions. One example is:
"""
struct z_kernel {
/* For compatibility with pre-SMP code, union the
Hi guys,
One problem with have in Zephyr regarding C99 is that we are using a lot
of unnamed struct/unions. One example is:
"""
struct z_kernel {
/* For compatibility with pre-SMP code, union the
|
By
Flavio Ceolin
·
#5587
·
|
|
Re: Get RSSI in DTM(Zephyr)
Hi Chen,
As I know, BLE RSSI can’t be measured in standard DTM mode. Is it possible to add new feature in DTM to support BLE RSSI measurement?
[vich] Yes, this is possible, but the command will
Hi Chen,
As I know, BLE RSSI can’t be measured in standard DTM mode. Is it possible to add new feature in DTM to support BLE RSSI measurement?
[vich] Yes, this is possible, but the command will
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#5586
·
|
|
Re: Get RSSI in DTM(Zephyr)
Hi Isaac,
Generally you would be measuring the RSSI on the test equipment from a signal generated by your Bluetooth radio, and would be using a calibrated accurate test system. The nRF51824 (from the
Hi Isaac,
Generally you would be measuring the RSSI on the test equipment from a signal generated by your Bluetooth radio, and would be using a calibrated accurate test system. The nRF51824 (from the
|
By
lairdjm
·
#5585
·
|
|
Re: Get RSSI in DTM(Zephyr)
Hi Vinayak,
Our customer requested us to test conductive BLE RSSI in factory for accuracy improvement.
Could you please clarify the following questions?
1. As I know, BLE RSSI can’t be
Hi Vinayak,
Our customer requested us to test conductive BLE RSSI in factory for accuracy improvement.
Could you please clarify the following questions?
1. As I know, BLE RSSI can’t be
|
By
Isaac Chen (陳尚航) <Isaac_Chen@...>
·
#5584
·
|
|
Re: Timer using FRDM-K64F
Hi,
Thank you for the replies.
I will look into the suggested API’s as well as the other suggestions.
Regards,
Nick
Nicholas Yameen
R&D Engineer
D 978-975-9675 x59675
E
Hi,
Thank you for the replies.
I will look into the suggested API’s as well as the other suggestions.
Regards,
Nick
Nicholas Yameen
R&D Engineer
D 978-975-9675 x59675
E
|
By
Nicholas Yameen <Nicholas.Yameen@...>
·
#5583
·
|