|
Stable releases 1.6.1 and 1.7.1
Hi,
We are pleased to announce the stable update releases to both Zephyr 1.7 and 1.6. The updates consist of bug fixes and updates to crypto related components. Below is the list of the changes for
Hi,
We are pleased to announce the stable update releases to both Zephyr 1.7 and 1.6. The updates consist of bug fixes and updates to crypto related components. Below is the list of the changes for
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#566
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.8-rc1 tagged
Hi,
2 weeks later than planned we are pleased to announce that 1.8-rc1 has been tagged signaling the end of the merge window and the start of the bug fix and stabilisation cycle for Zephyr 1.8.
Hi,
2 weeks later than planned we are pleased to announce that 1.8-rc1 has been tagged signaling the end of the merge window and the start of the bug fix and stabilisation cycle for Zephyr 1.8.
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#565
·
|
|
STM32F4 Ethernet driver
Hello,
I was wondering if someone is already working on a STM32F4 Ethernet
driver?
- Erwin
Hello,
I was wondering if someone is already working on a STM32F4 Ethernet
driver?
- Erwin
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#564
·
|
|
Zephyr SDK 0.9.1 released
Hi,
Zephyr SDK 0.9.1 has been released and is available for download from:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/meta-zephyr-sdk/releases/download/0.9.1/zephyr-sdk-0.9.1-setup.run
Release
Hi,
Zephyr SDK 0.9.1 has been released and is available for download from:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/meta-zephyr-sdk/releases/download/0.9.1/zephyr-sdk-0.9.1-setup.run
Release
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#563
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9.1-rc
Hi Jammy,
No, it is not included in this bug fix release. We will address this in 0.10
Anas
Hi Jammy,
No, it is not included in this bug fix release. We will address this in 0.10
Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#562
·
|
|
Re: Porting Zephyr to STM32F103C8T6 Minimum System Development Board
Hi Siddharth,
Switch should be created by ext/hal/st/stm32cube/Makefile from CONFIG_SOC flag.
The right way to configure this flag is to define your SoC in
Hi Siddharth,
Switch should be created by ext/hal/st/stm32cube/Makefile from CONFIG_SOC flag.
The right way to configure this flag is to define your SoC in
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#561
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9.1-rc
Hi Anas,
How about OpenOCD 0.10 (with Zephyr support)? Is it included as well?
Thanks,
Jammy
Hi Anas,
How about OpenOCD 0.10 (with Zephyr support)? Is it included as well?
Thanks,
Jammy
|
By
Jammy Zhou
·
#560
·
|
|
Re: Porting Zephyr to STM32F103C8T6 Minimum System Development Board
Thanks Erwan, now I understand why the switch was not created. That still leaves us with how and where we have to create those switches to enable the right hearers.
Is there any _nice_ way to achieve
Thanks Erwan, now I understand why the switch was not created. That still leaves us with how and where we have to create those switches to enable the right hearers.
Is there any _nice_ way to achieve
|
By
Siddharth Chandrasekaran <siddharth@...>
·
#559
·
|
|
Zephyr SDK 0.9.1-rc
Hi,
We have just posted 0.9.1-rc of the Zephyr SDK. The major changes since the last release bring support for building the Xtensa architecture using GCC and support for running Zephyr inside Qemu.
Hi,
We have just posted 0.9.1-rc of the Zephyr SDK. The major changes since the last release bring support for building the Xtensa architecture using GCC and support for running Zephyr inside Qemu.
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#558
·
|
|
Re: Porting Zephyr to STM32F103C8T6 Minimum System Development Board
If we rely on stm32cube SDK, compilation switch "STM32F103x8" was not created because STM32F103xB was enough
to specify both STM32F103x8 and STM32F103xB from software point of view.
One difference
If we rely on stm32cube SDK, compilation switch "STM32F103x8" was not created because STM32F103xB was enough
to specify both STM32F103x8 and STM32F103xB from software point of view.
One difference
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#556
·
|
|
Re: STM32F4: Correct translation from native to LL clock driver
As it happens this is the other reason that I'm reluctant to make a pull request of the current code base.
I've not heard of anyone getting the existing DW driver working on STM32. I certainly agree
As it happens this is the other reason that I'm reluctant to make a pull request of the current code base.
I've not heard of anyone getting the existing DW driver working on STM32. I certainly agree
|
By
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...>
·
#555
·
|
|
Re: STM32F4: Correct translation from native to LL clock driver
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the branch, I'll eventually experiment it on the L4 boards aswell.
But, these STM32 SoCs embeds all the same Synopsys IP, except FS one uses a register to power up the internal
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the branch, I'll eventually experiment it on the L4 boards aswell.
But, these STM32 SoCs embeds all the same Synopsys IP, except FS one uses a register to power up the internal
|
By
Neil Armstrong
·
#554
·
|
|
Zephyr Board for USB Webcam!
Hello,
I want to build my own "Security Camera" with Zephyr. For that I am looking for the right board to interact with my USB Webcam. Which board will be the best for such an application?
Thanks,
Hello,
I want to build my own "Security Camera" with Zephyr. For that I am looking for the right board to interact with my USB Webcam. Which board will be the best for such an application?
Thanks,
|
By
Kevin Stöckl <k_stoeckl@...>
·
#557
·
|
|
Re: Porting Zephyr to STM32F103C8T6 Minimum System Development Board
Hi Erwan,
Thanks, I did notice that. Infact that's the reason I ORed it to existing headder. But was unsure since none of the existing includes had a anything ORed with them.
Perhaps, we should OR all
Hi Erwan,
Thanks, I did notice that. Infact that's the reason I ORed it to existing headder. But was unsure since none of the existing includes had a anything ORed with them.
Perhaps, we should OR all
|
By
Siddharth Chandrasekaran <siddharth@...>
·
#553
·
|
|
Re: STM32F4: Correct translation from native to LL clock driver
Yes!
It solves the problem in the sense that devices are now enumerating correctly! However I'm afraid that the code isn't really robust enough for me to contemplate a pull request at this point
Yes!
It solves the problem in the sense that devices are now enumerating correctly! However I'm afraid that the code isn't really robust enough for me to contemplate a pull request at this point
|
By
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...>
·
#552
·
|
|
Re: Porting Zephyr to STM32F103C8T6 Minimum System Development Board
According to ext/hal/st/stm32cube/stm32f1xx/soc/stm32f1xx.h,
you should use STM32F103xB:
/* #define STM32F103xB */ /*!< STM32F103C8, STM32F103R8, STM32F103T8, STM32F103V8, STM32F103CB,
According to ext/hal/st/stm32cube/stm32f1xx/soc/stm32f1xx.h,
you should use STM32F103xB:
/* #define STM32F103xB */ /*!< STM32F103C8, STM32F103R8, STM32F103T8, STM32F103V8, STM32F103CB,
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#551
·
|
|
Re: Porting Zephyr to STM32F103C8T6 Minimum System Development Board
Hi Siddharth,
Thanks for the update. I'll have a look about STM32F103x8 and get back to you.
This is indeed strange not having a define for this part.
Erwan
Hi Siddharth,
Thanks for the update. I'll have a look about STM32F103x8 and get back to you.
This is indeed strange not having a define for this part.
Erwan
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#550
·
|
|
Re: Porting Zephyr to STM32F103C8T6 Minimum System Development Board
Hi Erwan,
Thanks for your speedy response, that was very helpful. After adding the pin mux settings, I was able to get the UART to work.
I added a new CONFIG value for STM32F103X8 and had to do a
Hi Erwan,
Thanks for your speedy response, that was very helpful. After adding the pin mux settings, I was able to get the UART to work.
I added a new CONFIG value for STM32F103X8 and had to do a
|
By
Siddharth Chandrasekaran <siddharth@...>
·
#549
·
|
|
Re: Reading Values From not supported sensors
+list
Please remember to keep the list in CC.
+list
Please remember to keep the list in CC.
|
By
Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...>
·
#547
·
|
|
Representing Sensor Values with Arduino DUE
Hello,
I want to represent my sensor values which are collected with the Arduino DUE in the web over WiFi. For Example in thingsboard.io.
How is it possible to realize this?
Thanks in AdvanceKevin
Hello,
I want to represent my sensor values which are collected with the Arduino DUE in the web over WiFi. For Example in thingsboard.io.
How is it possible to realize this?
Thanks in AdvanceKevin
|
By
Kevin Stöckl <k_stoeckl@...>
·
#548
·
|