Hi Tommy, I wanted to circle back around to make sure you were able to get your questions answered. If not, please let me know and I will help get you the answers you need. If you have not done so

> there are signs that there may be optimization enabled Note that you can check the configuration sanitycheck used in the sanity-out folder, for example for hello_world with native_posix the

You may need one extra level of quotation, see --extra-args CMAKE_C_FLAGS example and sanitycheck pointer in https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/14593/files "test/determinism.sh"

Dear All Is there an option (or any instruction on how to modify the code) to disable all optimization in sanitycheck? Purpose: When I was looking at the code coverage report generated by sanitycheck,

You need to call the API from user mode in order to exercise the handler functions. If you call the APIs from supervisor mode, the software interrupt and handler function are bypassed and control goes

Hello Stefan, "Stefan Jaritz" <stefan@...> wrote: [] Recently, a new "async" UART API was added to Zephyr, whose implementation could leverage DMA support (that was one of usecases

Dear All I am trying to write some coverage test to cover Z_SYSCALL_HANDLERs and I need some clue on how to start. I know I have to set CONFIG_USERSPACE. Normally for Z_SYSCALL_HANDLER(funcA), gcov

Hi all, due to how advanced security features (TEE) and device firmware upgrade (MCUBoot) is organized we are seeing the need to boot Zephyr applications in multiple stages. A real-world use-case

Hi all, due to how advanced security features (TEE) and device firmware upgrade (MCUBoot) is organized we are seeing the need to boot Zephyr applications in multiple stages. A real-world use-case

Thanks Johan, it's handy to use. Best Regards, Kai

Stefan, I've ever implemented a DMA-enabled UART on STM32F4 boards, but based on much old version of zephyr. I can try rebasing it to the latest zephyr if you are interested. Regards, Jun On

Hi all, due to how advanced security features (TEE) and device firmware upgrade (MCUBoot) is organized we are seeing the need to boot Zephyr applications in multiple stages. A real-world use-case

Hey, I am currently experimenting with ZephyrOS on different tasks. My base is an own dev board which has a stm32f4xx MCU that connects different ICs etc. via UART, I2C, SPI & GPIOs. Currently the

Hi Kai, The bt_set_name() and bt_get_name() APIs were introduced in Zephyr 1.13. Johan

Hello, I’m using Zephyr v1.12.0 release, the sample code I used is ./sample/bluetooth/mesh/. In this project, I know the device name (used at provisioning phase over PB-GATT) is predefined in

Hi Johan, sorry to bother you again. We try to launch Bluetooth service. After typing “systemctl status bluetooth.service” , some error messages as following: Could you give us some

Hi Lars, Do they use MS OS Descriptors to pick right driver? We have this capability in Zephyr, it is used in RNDIS to pick RNDIS compatible device driver. You can also create issue for the

Hi, The inf file is needed only for older versions of Windows, the latest one (Win10) only needs this patch from the PR

I just found this awesome article by Reilly Grant covering all the quirks: https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/native-hardware/build-for-webusb/

Hi Carles, If the right descriptors are added, it should be possible to get working without the *.inf file. Windows is a mess - but it *is* possible. There seem to be something wrong in the