Hi Jon, Zephyr has its own driver model, and its own APIs, but it accepts external HALs. If you have an already existing "generic driver, you'll be able to put in it ext/hal/broadcom and write a

Hi all, I cannot seem to find any info on this question, so I thought I'd ask here. My question is this: When a driver (eg. SPI or UART) is invoked through FreeRTOS, it is using the vendor HAL (or

Stated alternatively, Would it be acceptable usptream to have a HAL-like layer that would abstract the OS dependent calls in a driver (thus allowing for the drivers to be used in other

Would you like my review on this ? I can test on my board. Thanks -- Lucas Tanure Embedded Developer +55 19 988176559

Guys, I would like to know, how easily I can port any other OS(If we have any other proprietary OS) into this architecture. Best Regards Prasad

Hi Lucas, There is a pull request that adds support for STM32F7 + STM32F723E Discovery board: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/187 . I plan to finish upstreaming it in a week when I

Hello, I made an initial STM32F4 Ethernet driver. It is based on the HAL version, and doesn't try to be smart with DMA and packet buffer memory, it just does memcpy to/from the DMA buffers. But it

Hi, I would like to develop the port for stm32f7, in order to use zephyr in my STM32F746G-DISCO. I saw some code related to stm32f7 under "ex" folder, and one thread in november of 2016 : "Porting to

+1 d) Use DTS overlays. If this requires multiple overlays, we can extend that to provide the feature.

Hi Neil, +1 for me too. This would really be handy in long range. Obviously, one point to solve is how to deal with pinmuxing. I see at least 3 options: a) Keep board independant pinmuxing, and up to

Hi Neil, I think this is a great idea to support another layer for shields and extensions on top of existing boards. This will also allow usage for custom test shields that can specified for

Hi, Most of the board supported by zephyr can use extension boards via the Arduino or ST Morpho connectors for example, but there is no simple way to explicit support for these in the Zephyr

Zephyr TSC Members and Zephyr Developers, As we approach the M5 milestone for Zephyr 1.8 (the 1.8 release milestone planned for end of next week), we simultaneously approach the M0 milestone for

Hi Kevin, Can you file an issue (hit green “New Issue” button) at: https://github.com/01org/zephyr.js/issues That is the proper forum to address this issue. Add more details there

Thanks, now i can connect my board. But there is another problem. When i try to run a Programm it comes an Error (Error: set transfer raw). What could be the problem? Von: Kinder, David B

Hi Erwin, Indeed, make flash functionality has been lost when moving to dts description. The issue is reported in JIRA: https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-2119 Andy proposed a PR to correct

Hello, Several boards (mostly STM32) have the following lines; OPENOCD_LOAD_CMD = "flash write_image erase ${O}/${KERNEL_BIN_NAME} ${CONFIG_FLASH_BASE_ADDRESS}" OPENOCD_VERIFY_CMD = "verify_image

Hello Anas, Thanks, already raised PR #320. Siddharth.

Submit a pull request please with the change below. Seems to be a reasonable enhancement. Anas

Hello, In shell, to select a module, we use 'select <module_name>'. When inside a module, there is no indication on how one has to leave the module. Would it be better to have an 'exit' ? I know