|
Need help in establishing client-server socket communication between my Ubuntu PC and PCA10056 board, on which Zephyr is running.
#nrf52840
#samples
Hi Team,
I am running tcp socket client program in Ubuntu bash of Windows subsystem for Linux and server program on PCA10056 board, on which zephyr is running. I am able to establish connection and
Hi Team,
I am running tcp socket client program in Ubuntu bash of Windows subsystem for Linux and server program on PCA10056 board, on which zephyr is running. I am able to establish connection and
|
By
giriprasad@...
·
#6321
·
|
|
Re: LWM2M batch uploading data
Thanks for the info Mike. Queueing mode seems like it would resolve some worries, but would you mind clarifying one thing? From the issue:
Wake up before lifetime or observation (if any)
Thanks for the info Mike. Queueing mode seems like it would resolve some worries, but would you mind clarifying one thing? From the issue:
Wake up before lifetime or observation (if any)
|
By
Benjamin Lindqvist
·
#6320
·
|
|
Re: LWM2M batch uploading data
Hello Benjamin,
You are correct. The missing piece is LwM2M queue mode support. This mode is registered during the initial client / server connection. It means there is a mutual agreement that the
Hello Benjamin,
You are correct. The missing piece is LwM2M queue mode support. This mode is registered during the initial client / server connection. It means there is a mutual agreement that the
|
By
Michael Scott
·
#6319
·
|
|
API Meeting Agenda: 2019-09-24
Carles has asked me to lead the API telecon Tuesday 2019-09-24 as he will not be available. Topics to discuss include:
* Status and concerns related to PR #17155 to change how timeout delays are
Carles has asked me to lead the API telecon Tuesday 2019-09-24 as he will not be available. Topics to discuss include:
* Status and concerns related to PR #17155 to change how timeout delays are
|
By
Peter A. Bigot
·
#6318
·
|
|
Request for reviews: change to timeout representation in kernel functions
PR 17155 (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/17155) is an API cleanup that changes the type used to store timeout delays from a signed integer representing milliseconds to an opaque
PR 17155 (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/17155) is an API cleanup that changes the type used to store timeout delays from a signed integer representing milliseconds to an opaque
|
By
Peter A. Bigot
·
#6317
·
|
|
Re: LWM2M batch uploading data
To be honest, it sort of seems as if the implementation assumes it has a perpetually open socket connection to cloud at all times. Perhaps this is an exaggeration, but I'd kind of like to know how
To be honest, it sort of seems as if the implementation assumes it has a perpetually open socket connection to cloud at all times. Perhaps this is an exaggeration, but I'd kind of like to know how
|
By
Benjamin Lindqvist
·
#6316
·
|
|
LWM2M batch uploading data
Hi,
We have a use-case which I deem to be pretty normal: uplinks are really expensive and should be kept to a minimum (in fact, we want the radio completely powered off 99.99% of the time). But we
Hi,
We have a use-case which I deem to be pretty normal: uplinks are really expensive and should be kept to a minimum (in fact, we want the radio completely powered off 99.99% of the time). But we
|
By
Benjamin Lindqvist
·
#6315
·
|
|
zeohyr nucleo and i2c
hi,
I'm working on zephyr os and a grove NFC ( seeedstudio grove nfc tag V1.0) and a nucleo l432kc.
the question is : it must communicate with I2C. Does anybody knows how i have to do ?
thanx
hi,
I'm working on zephyr os and a grove NFC ( seeedstudio grove nfc tag V1.0) and a nucleo l432kc.
the question is : it must communicate with I2C. Does anybody knows how i have to do ?
thanx
|
By
Jerome Amos <amos.jerome@...>
·
#6314
·
|
|
Re: 4G/5G modem supported by Zephyr or not?
Thanks for the reply! The Telit moduled like UE866 and LE910 supports ppp natively and there are 3gpp at commands that switch the state of the modem from at mode to ppp mode. I saw in the video you
Thanks for the reply! The Telit moduled like UE866 and LE910 supports ppp natively and there are 3gpp at commands that switch the state of the modem from at mode to ppp mode. I saw in the video you
|
By
Shlomi Vaknin
·
#6313
·
|
|
Re: 4G/5G modem supported by Zephyr or not?
Hello Shlomi,
If the modem had a physical interface which supported the PPP protocol you could in theory create a new: modem_iface_ppp.c file which managed it (as opposed to using
Hello Shlomi,
If the modem had a physical interface which supported the PPP protocol you could in theory create a new: modem_iface_ppp.c file which managed it (as opposed to using
|
By
Michael Scott
·
#6312
·
|
|
Re: 4G/5G modem supported by Zephyr or not?
Is there a way to connect the ppp protocol to the modem context and work with this network interface instead of the stack that is built in the modem?
בתאריך יום ד׳, 18 בספט׳ 2019
Is there a way to connect the ppp protocol to the modem context and work with this network interface instead of the stack that is built in the modem?
בתאריך יום ד׳, 18 בספט׳ 2019
|
By
Shlomi Vaknin
·
#6311
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting - Thu, 09/19/2019 8:00am-9:00am, Please RSVP
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting
When: Thursday, 19 September 2019, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203
An RSVP is requested. Click here
Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting
When: Thursday, 19 September 2019, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203
An RSVP is requested. Click here
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#6310
·
|
|
Re: question in zephyrproject
The import error is solved due to you guys. Thank you.
>>> 1. USER_SITE is the directory where pykwalify was installed
>>> 2. ENABLE_USER_SITE is True
>>> 3. sys.path contains the directory
The import error is solved due to you guys. Thank you.
>>> 1. USER_SITE is the directory where pykwalify was installed
>>> 2. ENABLE_USER_SITE is True
>>> 3. sys.path contains the directory
|
By
Jaemin Choi <jaeminy.choi@...>
·
#6309
·
|
|
Dev Review Meeting Agenda - 18 Sept 2019
Here’s the agenda topics for this week:
[TOPIC-GPIO]: Introduce helper functions for irq flags [kumar]
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/19251
kernel: Introduce k_triggered_work:
Here’s the agenda topics for this week:
[TOPIC-GPIO]: Introduce helper functions for irq flags [kumar]
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/19251
kernel: Introduce k_triggered_work:
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#6308
·
|
|
Re: Consequences of relying on 64 bit uptime
The function k_uptime_get() returns time in milliseconds, since this is a 64-bit number (63-bits if you use signed math), it will almost never wrap (well, once every 292 million years, but as far as
The function k_uptime_get() returns time in milliseconds, since this is a 64-bit number (63-bits if you use signed math), it will almost never wrap (well, once every 292 million years, but as far as
|
By
Lawrence King
·
#6307
·
|
|
Re: Consequences of relying on 64 bit uptime
Generally it's much more often than 50 days. The hardware counter is the overflow that needs to be detected, not the millisecond count. With a 24 bit counter updating at 100+ MHz speds (c.f.
Generally it's much more often than 50 days. The hardware counter is the overflow that needs to be detected, not the millisecond count. With a 24 bit counter updating at 100+ MHz speds (c.f.
|
By
Andy Ross
·
#6306
·
|
|
Re: 4G/5G modem supported by Zephyr or not?
Hello Liang,
On 9/17/19 8:47 PM, liang ding wrote:
I gave a presentation at Embedded Linux Conference about this exact subject.
Slides:
Hello Liang,
On 9/17/19 8:47 PM, liang ding wrote:
I gave a presentation at Embedded Linux Conference about this exact subject.
Slides:
|
By
Michael Scott
·
#6305
·
|
|
Consequences of relying on 64 bit uptime
Hey,
I seem to recall this mentioned in the documentation, but now I can't find it anywhere.
What are the ramifications/constraints of relying upon a 64 bit k_uptime_get if one wants to avoid the 55
Hey,
I seem to recall this mentioned in the documentation, but now I can't find it anywhere.
What are the ramifications/constraints of relying upon a 64 bit k_uptime_get if one wants to avoid the 55
|
By
Benjamin Lindqvist
·
#6304
·
|
|
Re: BMX160 Driver
Hi Jeff,
I can't speak of in progress drivers.
The best way to understand how to create drivers in zephyr, in my experience so far, is to look at the current drivers. That said if the devices really
Hi Jeff,
I can't speak of in progress drivers.
The best way to understand how to create drivers in zephyr, in my experience so far, is to look at the current drivers. That said if the devices really
|
By
Tom Burdick
·
#6303
·
|
|
Re: 4G/5G modem supported by Zephyr or not?
If the 4G/5G modem module is AT command based, it’s possible to add in zephyr through SOCKET OFFLOAD or NET CONTEXT OFFLOAD.
You can refer the codes in drivers/modem/ublox-sara-r4.c for NB-IoT
If the 4G/5G modem module is AT command based, it’s possible to add in zephyr through SOCKET OFFLOAD or NET CONTEXT OFFLOAD.
You can refer the codes in drivers/modem/ublox-sara-r4.c for NB-IoT
|
By
Wayne Ren
·
#6302
·
|