Hi, Indeed the driver requires another instance to be added. Hopefully it's trivial, basically a copy-paste of the existing one minor tiny modifications. The annoying part will be modifying Kconfig

Multiple network interfaces can be supported. It should be relatively easy to add multiple-instance support to eth_mcux driver since it already works with context. Regards, Loic

Hello Nie, First you have a limitation in the fact the ethernet driver (eth_mcux) for this board is implemented as single instance, you need 2 instances (new feature implementation). I’m also

Hi Guys: I get an i.mxRT106x development kit board recently. It is developed by third party . This boards have two Ethernet port.The processor is i.mxRT1061, I hope to link several boards as

Hi, Please try and give feedback directly in the github issue. Anas From:Ivan Kravets <notifications@...> Reply to: platformio/platformio-core

In general, it does not appear that code and data relocation currently manages the MPU. For example, z_arch_configure_static_mpu_regions() had no provision for a potential SRAM region of execution

Hi everyone, I am building a Zephyr based USB-BLE dongle, which works already quite good for multiple simultaneous 1Mbps connections connections. Does anyone know if it is possible to have

Cancelled: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting This event has been cancelled. When: Thursday, 14 November 2019 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-08:00) America/Los

Hi Stephanos, Thanks for your response. I have following question: 1. By Default , What data rate (1M or 2M bps) are set in zephyr code ? if it is 2Mbps , How can I set it to 1Mbps? PS:

Has anyone had issues combining data/code relocation and __ramfunc support? __ramfunc functions as expected on an iMXRT1062 system. When additional code is relocated via the file-based

Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs When: Tuesday, 12 November 2019, 9:00am to 10:00am, (GMT-08:00) America/Los Angeles Where:https://zoom.us/j/177647878 An RSVP is requested. Click here to

Hi Carles, Thank you for keeping us up to date and supporting with this topic. I’ve added 2 more colleagues; Artem was already in contact with Pawel to add his code to Infineon github repo

Hi, I suppose you are performing RX sensitivity test. > If RF equipment send a dbm above -86(ex: -85 , -84 , -83 …..), the error message will disappear. Assuming you are testing with BLE

Adding Vinayak. If this depends on the dBm setting it might be a bug actually. I’ll let Vinayak weigh in. Carles

Hi Pawel, Copying a couple of people from Infineon that might be interested in your work. About your questions. You are expected to provide the board files in a single Pull Request. If you

Hello, I am currently working on project based on EFM32PG board and Optiga Trust X (security chip). I already did some work on implementing their framework and I run it with success with sample

+ jimmy

Hi , Sorry , correction. We have a product using nRF51824 with Zephyr v1.13.0. Our DUT connect with RF equipment. [Test sequence] Step1: DUT enter Rx mode with HCI command. Step2: RF

Hi , We have a product using nRF51824 with Zephyr v1.13.0. Our DUT connect with RF equipment. [Test sequence] Step1: DUT enter Rx mode with HCI command. Step2: RF equipment send 1500 bytes

Thanks Adam, I have upgraded zephyr to latest version (2.1.0) using west update. Now with the configuration of my application as well as mcuboot, i reached at the stage where i can upload the signed