|
Re: Linkage Zephyr V1.13 versus V2.X
Hi Lawrence,
As far as I know this one
CONFIG_BT_GATT_DYNAMIC_DB=y
did the trick as specified in your prj.conf as well.
Br,
Frank
Hi Lawrence,
As far as I know this one
CONFIG_BT_GATT_DYNAMIC_DB=y
did the trick as specified in your prj.conf as well.
Br,
Frank
|
By
frv
·
#6546
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Linkage Zephyr V1.13 versus V2.X
This is what I have my prj.conf, yours might be different, an I’m not sure what I have is 100% correct:
# BT
This is what I have my prj.conf, yours might be different, an I’m not sure what I have is 100% correct:
# BT
|
By
Lawrence King
·
#6545
·
|
|
Re: Linkage Zephyr V1.13 versus V2.X
Hi all,
Sorry replied the solution to myself and not to the group, but solution is to set the option "CONFIG_BT_GATT_DYNAMIC_DB=y"
in the application prj.conf file, otherwise it is no longer possible
Hi all,
Sorry replied the solution to myself and not to the group, but solution is to set the option "CONFIG_BT_GATT_DYNAMIC_DB=y"
in the application prj.conf file, otherwise it is no longer possible
|
By
frv
·
#6544
·
|
|
Re: Linkage Zephyr V1.13 versus V2.X
Hi Lawrence,
Correct, but this one was quite easy to find as the compiler raised the issue as the function parameters no longer matched.
Having to specify the option in the prj.conf to support
Hi Lawrence,
Correct, but this one was quite easy to find as the compiler raised the issue as the function parameters no longer matched.
Having to specify the option in the prj.conf to support
|
By
frv
·
#6543
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Linkage Zephyr V1.13 versus V2.X
I had the same issue when moving forward kernel versions. The API for
At the top level get rid of the bt_gatt_ccc_cfg variables (my code has two characteristics) :
#ifndef NEW_BT_STACK
static
I had the same issue when moving forward kernel versions. The API for
At the top level get rid of the bt_gatt_ccc_cfg variables (my code has two characteristics) :
#ifndef NEW_BT_STACK
static
|
By
Lawrence King
·
#6542
·
|
|
Linkage Zephyr V1.13 versus V2.X
Hi all,
Recently I have moved from Zephyr 1.13 to V2.
I ported my simple BLE peripheral application based on the sample code peripheral_hr from V1.13 to V2.
However I can't seem to get it build
Hi all,
Recently I have moved from Zephyr 1.13 to V2.
I ported my simple BLE peripheral application based on the sample code peripheral_hr from V1.13 to V2.
However I can't seem to get it build
|
By
frv
·
#6541
·
Edited
|
|
Zephyr 2.1.0-rc3 tagged
Hi Zephyr developers,
Zephyr 2.1.0-rc3 release candidate has been tagged.
Current issue status:
Priority
Count
Has PR
High
0
-
Medium
17
1
Testing Zephyr release candidate is
Hi Zephyr developers,
Zephyr 2.1.0-rc3 release candidate has been tagged.
Current issue status:
Priority
Count
Has PR
High
0
-
Medium
17
1
Testing Zephyr release candidate is
|
By
David Leach
·
#6540
·
|
|
Re: DFU OTA by using mcuboot bootloader in serial recovery mode
#ble
#hci
#nrf52480
#uart
Hi Mayank:
I had a similar requirement, also without a button on the same Nordic chip. I simply copied this file into my project, and called smp_svr_init() from my main() after bluetooth was up
Hi Mayank:
I had a similar requirement, also without a button on the same Nordic chip. I simply copied this file into my project, and called smp_svr_init() from my main() after bluetooth was up
|
By
Lawrence King
·
#6539
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Project: APIs - Tue, 12/03/2019 9:00am-10:00am, Please RSVP
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs
When: Tuesday, 3 December 2019, 9:00am to 10:00am, (GMT-08:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/177647878
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs
When: Tuesday, 3 December 2019, 9:00am to 10:00am, (GMT-08:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/177647878
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#6538
·
|
|
API meeting: Agenda
Hi all,
This week we will focus on GPIO:
- GPIO: Update on progress
- Look at the PRs with driver conversion (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/18530)
- Check users of GPIO
Hi all,
This week we will focus on GPIO:
- GPIO: Update on progress
- Look at the PRs with driver conversion (https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/18530)
- Check users of GPIO
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#6537
·
|
|
DFU OTA by using mcuboot bootloader in serial recovery mode
#ble
#hci
#nrf52480
#uart
Hello All,
Right now I'm exploring the best way to do DFU OTA.
I would like to ask that how i can do the DFU by booting the mcuboot bootloader in serial recovery mode.
I have one nrf52840_pca10056
Hello All,
Right now I'm exploring the best way to do DFU OTA.
I would like to ask that how i can do the DFU by booting the mcuboot bootloader in serial recovery mode.
I have one nrf52840_pca10056
|
By
Mayank <mayank7117@...>
·
#6536
·
|
|
Re: How to combine smp_svr and hci_uart app's of zephyr for DFU OTA
#hci
#nrf52480
#ble
#uart
#samples
Hi
Q1 – no, this mens that higher part of BLE stack runs on HCI client which has no access to nRF52840 flash at all.
Q2 – mcuboot serial recovery or your proprietary protocol which can share
Hi
Q1 – no, this mens that higher part of BLE stack runs on HCI client which has no access to nRF52840 flash at all.
Q2 – mcuboot serial recovery or your proprietary protocol which can share
|
By
Puzdrowski, Andrzej
·
#6535
·
|
|
How to combine smp_svr and hci_uart app's of zephyr for DFU OTA
#hci
#nrf52480
#ble
#uart
#samples
Hi,
I want to do an DFU OTA in nRF52840 BLE chip.
I have flashed mcuboot bootloader and also flashed hci_uart (To scan BLE beacons) application. This will be one time flash using JTAG.
Now, I want
Hi,
I want to do an DFU OTA in nRF52840 BLE chip.
I have flashed mcuboot bootloader and also flashed hci_uart (To scan BLE beacons) application. This will be one time flash using JTAG.
Now, I want
|
By
Mayank <mayank7117@...>
·
#6534
·
|
|
Re: How to add support for Silabs EFM32JG12B?
Am Freitag, den 22.11.2019, 08:17 -0600 schrieb Kumar Gala:
Thank you, i missed the answer somehow. Your mail gives me some good
pointers.
Yes, it does.
There is also the e.g. efm32gg12b which has
Am Freitag, den 22.11.2019, 08:17 -0600 schrieb Kumar Gala:
Thank you, i missed the answer somehow. Your mail gives me some good
pointers.
Yes, it does.
There is also the e.g. efm32gg12b which has
|
By
Christian Taedcke <hacking@...>
·
#6533
·
|
|
Zephyr v2.1.0 release notes requests
The v2.1.0 release notes are lacking any updates for the following sections:
Kernel
Bluetooth
Libraries/Subsystems
HALs
Documentation
Tests and Samples
Please help fill in these details.
The v2.1.0 release notes are lacking any updates for the following sections:
Kernel
Bluetooth
Libraries/Subsystems
HALs
Documentation
Tests and Samples
Please help fill in these details.
|
By
David Leach
·
#6532
·
|
|
Re: USB fails to enumerate on nrf52840_pca10056 board
Hi Steve,
There are various issues with your silicon versions:
1) SDK 14.2 was the last version to support engineering A silicon as per
Hi Steve,
There are various issues with your silicon versions:
1) SDK 14.2 was the last version to support engineering A silicon as per
|
By
lairdjm
·
#6531
·
|
|
Re: USB fails to enumerate on nrf52840_pca10056 board
Hi Emil,
Thanks for the files.
Neither work on my boards.
I suspect my silicon may be too old. I've had the boards for a couple
of years.
The build/date codes on both boards are:
Hi Emil,
Thanks for the files.
Neither work on my boards.
I suspect my silicon may be too old. I've had the boards for a couple
of years.
The build/date codes on both boards are:
|
By
Steve Brown
·
#6530
·
|
|
Re: USB fails to enumerate on nrf52840_pca10056 board
Hello,
I've tested it on 77006e896 with nRF52840_pca10056 board:
- samples/subsys/usb/cdc_acm
- tests/subsys/usb/desc_sections
Both works fine for me.
Here are hex files, please verify if both works
Hello,
I've tested it on 77006e896 with nRF52840_pca10056 board:
- samples/subsys/usb/cdc_acm
- tests/subsys/usb/desc_sections
Both works fine for me.
Here are hex files, please verify if both works
|
By
Obalski, Emil <Emil.Obalski@...>
·
#6529
·
|
|
Re: Add support Optiga Trust X
Hi Pawel,
We actually discussed a very similar case yesterday in the TSC meeting. The trusted-firmware-m module also requires mbedTLS, but a different version from the one we have in Zephyr. In
Hi Pawel,
We actually discussed a very similar case yesterday in the TSC meeting. The trusted-firmware-m module also requires mbedTLS, but a different version from the one we have in Zephyr. In
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#6528
·
|
|
Re: Add support Optiga Trust X
Hello,
I finished implementing basic library API (optiga/, examples/, pal/) and now I want to move on to work on mbedTLS and one questions arose:
Does Optiga Trust X module should contain
Hello,
I finished implementing basic library API (optiga/, examples/, pal/) and now I want to move on to work on mbedTLS and one questions arose:
Does Optiga Trust X module should contain
|
By
Paweł Zarembski
·
#6527
·
|