|
Re: Zephyr: IRC for Bluetooth discussion
Hi,
For Zephyr there’s #zephyrproject
For ZJS (Javascript runtime for Zephyr OS) there’s #zjs
There may be more but those are the ones I’m aware of. Both are on Freenode.
Hi,
For Zephyr there’s #zephyrproject
For ZJS (Javascript runtime for Zephyr OS) there’s #zjs
There may be more but those are the ones I’m aware of. Both are on Freenode.
|
By
Brian Jones
·
#678
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr: IRC for Bluetooth discussion
The OS is discussed in the general channel #zephyrproject. The Bluetooth stack for Zephyr is discussed in the channel #zephyr-bt.
The OS is discussed in the general channel #zephyrproject. The Bluetooth stack for Zephyr is discussed in the channel #zephyr-bt.
|
By
Justin
·
#677
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr: IRC for Bluetooth discussion
Hi Bjarne,
+ Adding the Developers mail list who will best be able to point you in the right direction
Thanks!
Brett
--
Brett Preston
The Linux Foundation
+1 (971) 303-9030
bpreston@...
Google
Hi Bjarne,
+ Adding the Developers mail list who will best be able to point you in the right direction
Thanks!
Brett
--
Brett Preston
The Linux Foundation
+1 (971) 303-9030
bpreston@...
Google
|
By
Brett Preston
·
#676
·
|
|
Re: CAN drivers/infrastructure
Not aware of any, always open to contribution :)
- k
Not aware of any, always open to contribution :)
- k
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#675
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Network application API
Hi Paul,
Looks like to me that net_app proposal is not growing the native API. It's fully optional.
Socket API and net_app are quite distinct. In fact, many application oriented API are
made on top
Hi Paul,
Looks like to me that net_app proposal is not growing the native API. It's fully optional.
Socket API and net_app are quite distinct. In fact, many application oriented API are
made on top
|
By
Tomasz Bursztyka
·
#674
·
|
|
Re: [RFC] Network application API
Hello Jukka,
Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
Thanks for posting this RFC. It touches some issue I also wanted to
post RFC about: with (1st stage of) BSD Sockets work nearing
Hello Jukka,
Jukka Rissanen <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
Thanks for posting this RFC. It touches some issue I also wanted to
post RFC about: with (1st stage of) BSD Sockets work nearing
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#673
·
|
|
Re: False positive on Shippable ?
I didn't change anything. You did eliminate the error, leaving only warnings, so perhaps that is why it passed.
David
I didn't change anything. You did eliminate the error, leaving only warnings, so perhaps that is why it passed.
David
|
By
David Brown
·
#672
·
|
|
Re: [USB] Nordic NRF52 USB support
Hi Richard,
nRF52832 in pca10040 does not support USB. Only nRF52840 in pca10056 has USB support.
That said, there is no USB driver as of yet for nRF52840 in Zephyr. Only planned work is to open
Hi Richard,
nRF52832 in pca10040 does not support USB. Only nRF52840 in pca10056 has USB support.
That said, there is no USB driver as of yet for nRF52840 in Zephyr. Only planned work is to open
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#671
·
|
|
[USB] Nordic NRF52 USB support
Hi Zephyr Developers,
first of all ... great work! I really love the software design of zephyr!
Is there some work in progress to support the USB driver in the
nrf52-pca10040 board?
I took a look
Hi Zephyr Developers,
first of all ... great work! I really love the software design of zephyr!
Is there some work in progress to support the USB driver in the
nrf52-pca10040 board?
I took a look
|
By
Richard Peters <mail@...>
·
#670
·
|
|
[RFC] Network application API
Hi all,
There has been discussion and complaints that the current net_context
API that applications can use is too low level and requires lot of
effort from application developer to create a bug free
Hi all,
There has been discussion and complaints that the current net_context
API that applications can use is too low level and requires lot of
effort from application developer to create a bug free
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#669
·
|
|
Re: False positive on Shippable ?
Hey David,
yes that one white-space thing I over looked. And now I fixed it the
other errors are gone to, which kind of surprises me.
Did you or someone else change anything between the two runs
Hey David,
yes that one white-space thing I over looked. And now I fixed it the
other errors are gone to, which kind of surprises me.
Did you or someone else change anything between the two runs
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#668
·
|
|
False positive on Shippable ?
Hey all,
Could someone tell me why shippable is complaining here?
https://app.shippable.com/github/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/runs/1619/consolidateTests
- Erwin
Hey all,
Could someone tell me why shippable is complaining here?
https://app.shippable.com/github/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/runs/1619/consolidateTests
- Erwin
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#667
·
|
|
Re: Next supported boards on Zephyr - STM32L0 ?
Hi Felix,
Indeed, it's planned but I still need to debug the base port.
If you want to give a try, here is my base branch :
https://github.com/superna9999/zephyr/commits/stm32l0x
I'll be happy to
Hi Felix,
Indeed, it's planned but I still need to debug the base port.
If you want to give a try, here is my base branch :
https://github.com/superna9999/zephyr/commits/stm32l0x
I'll be happy to
|
By
Neil Armstrong
·
#666
·
|
|
Is possible move to CMake and crosstools-ng in 1.9
Hi,
I am looking forward to that zephyr wil move to crosstools-ng and cmake
just want to know if there are detailed plans for these great work in the next release?
Thanks
Hi,
I am looking forward to that zephyr wil move to crosstools-ng and cmake
just want to know if there are detailed plans for these great work in the next release?
Thanks
|
By
jack ma
·
#665
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr help
Hi Tamra,
I do not know much about the Z-tree myself but assuming this is equivalent to the Zephyr kernel running on Arduino 101, you could get a lot of info directly from the Zephyr Project
Hi Tamra,
I do not know much about the Z-tree myself but assuming this is equivalent to the Zephyr kernel running on Arduino 101, you could get a lot of info directly from the Zephyr Project
|
By
Geoffroy Van Cutsem
·
#664
·
|
|
Re: Next supported boards on Zephyr - STM32L0 ?
Hi Felix,
From what I'm aware of, there is no such plan. Though, I know Neil as some L0
port working on his own (though on SoC STM32L053). I'm not sure what are his
plans on that, but maybe you could
Hi Felix,
From what I'm aware of, there is no such plan. Though, I know Neil as some L0
port working on his own (though on SoC STM32L053). I'm not sure what are his
plans on that, but maybe you could
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#663
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr 1.8.0 Released
Thanks for including my Olimex BSP.
- Erwin
Thanks for including my Olimex BSP.
- Erwin
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#660
·
|
|
Next supported boards on Zephyr - STM32L0 ?
Hi,
I would like to know if the Nucleo STM32L0xx boards from ST (for example STM32L073 with Cortex ARM M0+) will be part of the supported board in the next release of Zephyr ?
If it's not the case,
Hi,
I would like to know if the Nucleo STM32L0xx boards from ST (for example STM32L073 with Cortex ARM M0+) will be part of the supported board in the next release of Zephyr ?
If it's not the case,
|
By
Felix Levitre <Felix.Levitre@...>
·
#662
·
|
|
Zephyr help
Hello Zephyr Team,
I am using the Arduino 101 Curie Open Developer Kit Z-tree.
Link: https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/675544
When I try to compile a file in Zephyr using make config, there are a
Hello Zephyr Team,
I am using the Arduino 101 Curie Open Developer Kit Z-tree.
Link: https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/675544
When I try to compile a file in Zephyr using make config, there are a
|
By
Tamra Oyama <tamrako@...>
·
#661
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.8.0 Released
Hi,
We are pleased to announce the release of Zephyr kernel version 1.8.0.
Major enhancements with this release include:
* Tickless kernel
* IP Stack improvements
* Bluetooth 5.0
Hi,
We are pleased to announce the release of Zephyr kernel version 1.8.0.
Major enhancements with this release include:
* Tickless kernel
* IP Stack improvements
* Bluetooth 5.0
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#659
·
|