|
Re: Zephyr Toolchain Working Group Meeting – 11 June 2020 postponed to 18 June 2020
Hi Torsten,
Could you update the calendar? If not already done.
I believe that many will miss out, if the calendar does not reflect the rescheduling of the meeting.
Regards,
Danny
Hi Torsten,
Could you update the calendar? If not already done.
I believe that many will miss out, if the calendar does not reflect the rescheduling of the meeting.
Regards,
Danny
|
By
Danny Ørndrup (DAOR)
·
#7090
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr 2.3: BLE: BT SIG certification plans
#ble
#nrf52840
Hi Ryan,
This is still TBD, I will soon call a meeting to decide on this year’s qualification plans.
Thanks,
Carles
Hi Ryan,
This is still TBD, I will soon call a meeting to decide on this year’s qualification plans.
Thanks,
Carles
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#7089
·
|
|
Zephyr Toolchain Working Group Meeting – 11 June 2020 postponed to 18 June 2020
Today’s meeting has been postponed to 18 June.
Sorry for the late notice.
See you all in a weeks’ time from now.
Best regards
Torsten T. Rasmussen
Live meeting
Today’s meeting has been postponed to 18 June.
Sorry for the late notice.
See you all in a weeks’ time from now.
Best regards
Torsten T. Rasmussen
Live meeting
|
By
Rasmussen, Torsten
·
#7088
·
|
|
Re: Dev-Review Meeting Agenda Jun 10
"Bolivar, Marti via lists.zephyrproject.org"
<marti.bolivar=nordicsemi.no@...> writes:
The meeting has moved to a new Teams home and I've been told the wiki is
up to date, for
"Bolivar, Marti via lists.zephyrproject.org"
<marti.bolivar=nordicsemi.no@...> writes:
The meeting has moved to a new Teams home and I've been told the wiki is
up to date, for
|
By
Bolivar, Marti
·
#7087
·
|
|
Re: Dev-Review Meeting Agenda Jun 10
It seems like TSC moved to a new Teams meeting; will this be moving, too?
"Kumar Gala via lists.zephyrproject.org"
<kumar.gala=linaro.org@...> writes:
It seems like TSC moved to a new Teams meeting; will this be moving, too?
"Kumar Gala via lists.zephyrproject.org"
<kumar.gala=linaro.org@...> writes:
|
By
Bolivar, Marti
·
#7086
·
|
|
Dev-Review Meeting Agenda Jun 10
Here’s the agenda topics for this week:
* struct device - plans for 2.4:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/22941
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/26072
Here’s the agenda topics for this week:
* struct device - plans for 2.4:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/22941
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/26072
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#7085
·
|
|
Re: [Members] Enforcing a 2-approval policy in GitHub: request for more help with PR reviewing
Hi Paul,
Sure, let me post here for everyone's reference:
On Feb 2020 (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xiO721JwqW_H_BpGMOJ4PY3vLVy7nxW2fhy841nsP10/edit#heading=h.7ckwoo5xq75a) Zephyr TSC approved
Hi Paul,
Sure, let me post here for everyone's reference:
On Feb 2020 (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xiO721JwqW_H_BpGMOJ4PY3vLVy7nxW2fhy841nsP10/edit#heading=h.7ckwoo5xq75a) Zephyr TSC approved
|
By
Glaropoulos, Ioannis
·
#7084
·
|
|
Zephyr 2.3: BLE: BT SIG certification plans
#ble
#nrf52840
Are there any plans for Zephyr 2.3 to be BT SIG certified for host, controller, or profile (mesh) subsystems?
Are there any plans for Zephyr 2.3 to be BT SIG certified for host, controller, or profile (mesh) subsystems?
|
By
Ryan Erickson
·
#7083
·
|
|
Re: [Members] Enforcing a 2-approval policy in GitHub: request for more help with PR reviewing
Hello Ioannis,
"Glaropoulos, Ioannis" <Ioannis.Glaropoulos@...> wrote:
Thanks for the notification, Ioannis. I might have missed the discussion
and decision-making behind this change, can
Hello Ioannis,
"Glaropoulos, Ioannis" <Ioannis.Glaropoulos@...> wrote:
Thanks for the notification, Ioannis. I might have missed the discussion
and decision-making behind this change, can
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#7082
·
|
|
Re: override alias in test application
Hello,
There's no need to open an issue.
The alias should be named eeprom-0 in a DTS file,
aliases {
eeprom-0 = ...;
};
but needs to be eeprom_0 (i.e. "lowercase-and-underscores" form) in
Hello,
There's no need to open an issue.
The alias should be named eeprom-0 in a DTS file,
aliases {
eeprom-0 = ...;
};
but needs to be eeprom_0 (i.e. "lowercase-and-underscores" form) in
|
By
Bolivar, Marti
·
#7081
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Project: APIs - Tue, 06/09/2020 4:00pm-5:00pm, Please RSVP
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs
When: Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 4:00pm to 5:00pm, (GMT+00:00) UTC
Where:Microsoft Teams Meeting
An RSVP is requested. Click here to RSVP
Organizer:
Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs
When: Tuesday, 9 June 2020, 4:00pm to 5:00pm, (GMT+00:00) UTC
Where:Microsoft Teams Meeting
An RSVP is requested. Click here to RSVP
Organizer:
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#7080
·
|
|
Re: override alias in test application
Hi Carles,
thanks, I managed like this:
/ {
aliases {
eeprom_0 = &eeprom0;
};
};
but eeprom_0 is not a valid alias:
dtlib.DTError: /aliases: alias property name 'eeprom_0' should
Hi Carles,
thanks, I managed like this:
/ {
aliases {
eeprom_0 = &eeprom0;
};
};
but eeprom_0 is not a valid alias:
dtlib.DTError: /aliases: alias property name 'eeprom_0' should
|
By
Stefano Manni
·
#7079
·
|
|
Re: API meeting: agenda
Hi all,
A small addition to the agenda:
- PWM: add functions for capturing pwm pulse width and period
- Issue: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/26026
Carles
Hi all,
A small addition to the agenda:
- PWM: add functions for capturing pwm pulse width and period
- Issue: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/26026
Carles
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#7078
·
|
|
API meeting: agenda
Hi all,
*************************************************
We will be using Teams instead of
Hi all,
*************************************************
We will be using Teams instead of
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#7077
·
|
|
Re: override alias in test application
For properties there is /delete-property/ to delete one and then be able to override it.
In the case of an alias I am not sure, have you tried to override it directly?
Carles
On 08/06/2020,
For properties there is /delete-property/ to delete one and then be able to override it.
In the case of an alias I am not sure, have you tried to override it directly?
Carles
On 08/06/2020,
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#7076
·
|
|
Enforcing a 2-approval policy in GitHub: request for more help with PR reviewing
Dear Zephyr developers,
According to the Zephyr Project Roles and Contribution Guidelines documentation (https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/contribute/project_roles.html#merge-criteria), pull
Dear Zephyr developers,
According to the Zephyr Project Roles and Contribution Guidelines documentation (https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/contribute/project_roles.html#merge-criteria), pull
|
By
Glaropoulos, Ioannis
·
#7075
·
|
|
override alias in test application
Hi there,
I'm trying to compile test/drivers/eeprom for my board. I see that the
code requires the alias 'eeprom_0' defined, but my board does not have
it natively.
I managed to compile changing in
Hi there,
I'm trying to compile test/drivers/eeprom for my board. I see that the
code requires the alias 'eeprom_0' defined, but my board does not have
it natively.
I managed to compile changing in
|
By
Stefano Manni
·
#7074
·
|
|
Rebasing PRs post 2.3 merge window opening
All,
Please make sure to rebase PRs post the 2.3 merge window opening as the change to make C99 integer (PR #25679) types the default supported type in Zephyr will impact most PRs. Ensuring a rebase
All,
Please make sure to rebase PRs post the 2.3 merge window opening as the change to make C99 integer (PR #25679) types the default supported type in Zephyr will impact most PRs. Ensuring a rebase
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#7073
·
|
|
Re: Optional drivers and board configuration
HI Michael,
I’d say he cleanest way is to do it at the SoC level, like this:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/master/soc/arm/atmel_sam/same70/Kconfig.defconfig.series#L83
HI Michael,
I’d say he cleanest way is to do it at the SoC level, like this:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/blob/master/soc/arm/atmel_sam/same70/Kconfig.defconfig.series#L83
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#7072
·
|
|
Optional drivers and board configuration
Hi there. I'm adding a new SAM0 based board. What's the best way to enable optional peripherals? For example, not all users need the PWM driver. Should I:
- Put CONFIG_PWM=y and CONFIG_PWM_SAM0=y
Hi there. I'm adding a new SAM0 based board. What's the best way to enable optional peripherals? For example, not all users need the PWM driver. Should I:
- Put CONFIG_PWM=y and CONFIG_PWM_SAM0=y
|
By
Michael Hope
·
#7071
·
|