devel@lists.zephyrproject.org

Reg: Zephyr

Hi Zephyr Dev Team, I am planning to port this Zephyr OS on to Raspberrypi3 board. So i have below queries 1) Raspberry pi3 board supports Zephyr os or not to port? 2) In case it supports, what are

By Bandaru Sivakrishna <bandarusivakrishna@...> · #769 ·

Re: Raspberry pi.

No, not unless someone from Raspberry Pi does it. The schematics are locked down. I have tried to find the schematics for the Pi Zero. I think the only one the released vague schematics for was the

By Justin · #765 ·

Raspberry pi.

Hello, Is it possible that Zephyr OS will be released for the Raspberry pi? The best, Edward C. Deaver, IV

By Deaver, Edward <deaverec@...> · #764 ·

cpp support on Zephyr

Hi, Has anyone tried to compile cpp code into zephyr, what kind of settings, libraries will be required for Zephyr to include Cpp code? Thank you! Jun Li Intel Corporation | Santa

By Li, Jun R · #763 ·

Re: Questions on the BLE mesh example

Hi Jehudi, Currently the persistent flash storage is something that's left as the responsibility of the application. Eventually, there will be proper integrated support for this, but I'd wait for

By Johan Hedberg · #762 ·

Questions on the BLE mesh example

Congratulations on adding the BLE mesh functionality to zephyr so quick after the release of the standard. I am working on a smartlight based upon zephyr and would like to add the mesh functionality.

By laczenJMS · #761 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

Not sure. ;-) Mostly it is illustrating that the DT status of a peripheral is (pretty much) unrelated to the mcuboot protocols to hand over peripherals. Another minor point is that while it is

By Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...> · #760 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

Sorry, I'm not following how this is relevant to the questions about the bootloader/Zephyr boundary. Am I missing something? If this is a Zephyr internals discussion, could you please move it to

By Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...> · #759 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

I'd describe it that Linux uses *drivers* for activation. For example, it is the driver that makes the appropriate calls (usually via clock framework, etc) to enable and clock its peripheral. So

By Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...> · #758 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

A little bit :), perhaps. This thread is about clocks, peripherals, etc. which mcuboot may use and what should happen to them before control is passed to Zephyr; please note that this thread is also

By Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...> · #757 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

And if connected to HW, should it be enabled and clocked? Linux uses mix of Kconfig/dt. Kconfig for compilation/dt for activation. Do we want the same in Zephyr and keep these 2 levels of

By Erwan Gouriou · #756 ·

incoming build dependency on Python elftools

Some changes are coming in to convert host build tools like gen_idt and gen_offset_header to Python, as well as some new tools to support memory protection which involve parsing DWARF information in

By Boie, Andrew P · #755 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

OK, so it sounds like these DT changes aren't expressing expectations about the state of the peripheral. But based on David's response, it does seem like it matters to Zephyr what state the

By Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...> · #754 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

The enabled property doesn't describe whether the peripheral is active or not at bootloader handover. It is more like whether that peripheral is connected to something useful. DT describes the

By Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...> · #753 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

I don't think so. Part of the definition of the bootloader needs to be to describe what state it leaves things in. For most compatibility, it would seem best to leave things in as close to

By David Brown · #752 ·

Re: Passing information from bootloader to Zephyr

Hi, David's threads didn't get much response, but while looking at some STM32 rework in Zephyr, I thought it was worth another try. I especially want to highlight this part: ^^ Erwan, I noticed while

By Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...> · #751 ·

Re: STM32F0 nucleo board support.

Hi All, I'll be happy to follow your work on F0, I'll like to target the F051 from the F0x1 family. Thanks, Neil

By Neil Armstrong · #750 ·

Regarding 4G(LTE) Networking Support

Dear All, I am currently working on a 4G(LTE) Networking task, Then I turned to zephyr to try to set it as a beginning. The Internet articles told me it supports 3GPP protocols but I didn't find

By Sunjie.Wu · #748 ·

Regarding 4G(LTE) Networking Support

Dear All, I am currently working on a 4G(LTE) Networking task, Then I turned to zephyr to try to set it as a beginning. The Internet articles told me it supports 3GPP protocols but I didn't find

By Sunjie Wu <wusunjie@...> · #749 ·

Re: Development Environment Setup on Linux— Zephyr Project Documentation

Dear all, I installed the SDK on Ubuntu 16.04 64bit system today, it's OK. So, I guess there is something wrong in the installing script of "zephyr-sdk-0.9.1-setup.run" Or the tools(x86, arm, arc....)

By luobaidunpaigu@sina.com <luobaidunpaigu@...> · #747 ·

Messages