Cancelled: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting This event has been cancelled. When: Thursday, 2 January 2020 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-08:00) America/Los

Cancelled: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting This event has been cancelled. When: Thursday, 26 December 2019 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-08:00) America/Los

Cancelled: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting This event has been cancelled. When: Thursday, 19 December 2019 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-08:00) America/Los

Hi, We are excited to announce the release of Zephyr RTOS version 2.1.0! Major enhancements with this release include (but are not limited to): Normalized APIs across all

Dear all, as I can't find any extensions to GCC for Zephyr, I am wondering if C++ / strings can already be used safely on Zephyr? Please have a look at the "Porting to New Hardware or Operating

Adding devel@... to the email address. Lawrence King Principal Developer +1(416)627-7302

Hello, I have promoted NXP MCU LPC55S28JBD100 to our customer MOXA and I would like to propose them to use Zephyr OS but the LPC55S28JBD100 has not been supported to run the Zephyr OS. Would you

Hi Carles, Thanks for the tip. I would be really surprised that I already have a stack issue, as the application is still very simple... Nevertheless it can't harm to have this option

Hi there, One of the likely culprits is stack sizing. Please enable CONFIG_HW_STACK_PROTECTION and verify that one of your stacks is not overflowing. Regards, Carles

Hi all, I have the following setup: - nrf52 demo kit running a simple BLE peripheral application - Raspberry Pi running a BLE central application A secured connection is made (authentication based on

Hi all, Solved... It looks like when BT_GATT_CCC is set in the service MACRO define, it takes not 1 but 2 indices to advance as also there is automatically a descriptor char added if you need to

Cancelled: Zephyr Project: APIs This event has been cancelled. When: Tuesday, 31 December 2019 9:00am to 10:00am (UTC-08:00) America/Los Angeles Where: https://zoom.us/j/177647878 Organizer:

Cancelled: Zephyr Project: APIs This event has been cancelled. When: Tuesday, 24 December 2019 9:00am to 10:00am (UTC-08:00) America/Los Angeles Where: https://zoom.us/j/177647878 Organizer:

Hi all, I have a user defined BT GATT service with 2 user defined characteristics. The code is as simple as this for defining the GATT service. static struct bt_uuid_128 uuidButtonService =

Cancelled: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting This event has been cancelled. When: Thursday, 5 December 2019 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-08:00) America/Los

Hi Lawrence, As far as I know this one CONFIG_BT_GATT_DYNAMIC_DB=y did the trick as specified in your prj.conf as well. Br, Frank

This is what I have my prj.conf, yours might be different, an I’m not sure what I have is 100% correct: # BT

Hi all, Sorry replied the solution to myself and not to the group, but solution is to set the option "CONFIG_BT_GATT_DYNAMIC_DB=y" in the application prj.conf file, otherwise it is no longer possible

Hi Lawrence, Correct, but this one was quite easy to find as the compiler raised the issue as the function parameters no longer matched. Having to specify the option in the prj.conf to support

I had the same issue when moving forward kernel versions. The API for At the top level get rid of the bt_gatt_ccc_cfg variables (my code has two characteristics) : #ifndef NEW_BT_STACK static