|
Introducing west, Zephyr's meta-tool
Hi all,
For a few months now we have been working on a meta-tool named west, designed to act both as a command-line tool to build, flash an debug Zephyr-based applications and also to manage the
Hi all,
For a few months now we have been working on a meta-tool named west, designed to act both as a command-line tool to build, flash an debug Zephyr-based applications and also to manage the
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#5619
·
|
|
Re: NFC support Zephyr voor LE OOB secured pairing...
Hi Frank.
For NFC support with Zephyr on the Nordic HW can you have a look at the nRF Connect SDK (https://www.nordicsemi.com/Software-and-Tools/Software/nRF-Connect-SDK)
For OOB support in the
Hi Frank.
For NFC support with Zephyr on the Nordic HW can you have a look at the nRF Connect SDK (https://www.nordicsemi.com/Software-and-Tools/Software/nRF-Connect-SDK)
For OOB support in the
|
By
Joakim Andersson <joakim.andersson@...>
·
#5618
·
|
|
Re: NFC support Zephyr voor LE OOB secured pairing...
Hi Johan,
I was already aware this part was missing... :(.
Unfortunately for the moment we are on a very strict time schedule to come up with a BLE architecture for our near future wireless
Hi Johan,
I was already aware this part was missing... :(.
Unfortunately for the moment we are on a very strict time schedule to come up with a BLE architecture for our near future wireless
|
By
frv
·
#5617
·
|
|
Re: NFC support Zephyr voor LE OOB secured pairing...
Hi Frank,
Note that the APIs Rodrigo referred to are for Mesh provisioning, not for pairing. Zephyr doesn’t currently expose any OOB APIs for pairing, except bt_le_oob_get_local(), which only
Hi Frank,
Note that the APIs Rodrigo referred to are for Mesh provisioning, not for pairing. Zephyr doesn’t currently expose any OOB APIs for pairing, except bt_le_oob_get_local(), which only
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#5616
·
|
|
Re: NFC support Zephyr voor LE OOB secured pairing...
Hi Rodrigo,
Thanks for your valuable feedback. I will have a look at it and see how far I can get.
Best regards,
Frank
Hi Rodrigo,
Thanks for your valuable feedback. I will have a look at it and see how far I can get.
Best regards,
Frank
|
By
frv
·
#5615
·
|
|
Re: NFC support Zephyr voor LE OOB secured pairing...
Frank,
as far as I know, there are some functions that are being called during the provisioning process like "static int output_number(bt_mesh_output_action_t action, u32_t number)". This function (in
Frank,
as far as I know, there are some functions that are being called during the provisioning process like "static int output_number(bt_mesh_output_action_t action, u32_t number)". This function (in
|
By
Rodrigo Peixoto
·
#5614
·
|
|
Re: NFC support Zephyr voor LE OOB secured pairing...
Hi Rodrigo,
No not yet...
So far I'm still in the process of trying to understand how the NFC message (as described by the Bluetooth SIG) gets into the Bluetooth SW stack for the OOB pairing process.
Hi Rodrigo,
No not yet...
So far I'm still in the process of trying to understand how the NFC message (as described by the Bluetooth SIG) gets into the Bluetooth SW stack for the OOB pairing process.
|
By
frv
·
#5613
·
|
|
Re: NFC support Zephyr voor LE OOB secured pairing...
Frank,
I have a piece of code that wakes up the MCU through NFC, but I could not write or read data from it yet. We are using only the HAL code. The only tricky is to register the interrupt with
Frank,
I have a piece of code that wakes up the MCU through NFC, but I could not write or read data from it yet. We are using only the HAL code. The only tricky is to register the interrupt with
|
By
Rodrigo Peixoto
·
#5612
·
|
|
NFC support Zephyr voor LE OOB secured pairing...
Hi all,
As far as I can see there is no real support for NFC in Zephyr.
Correct?
I'm really getting stuck in the LE OOB pairing process...
I would really feel a pity I will need to fallback to
Hi all,
As far as I can see there is no real support for NFC in Zephyr.
Correct?
I'm really getting stuck in the LE OOB pairing process...
I would really feel a pity I will need to fallback to
|
By
frv
·
#5611
·
|
|
Re: BLE OOB - pairing/bonding - local-oob - HCI UART Zephyr issue?
Hi Johan,
Thanks for clarifying this one out, that is already a great relief. Honestly I'm a little bit stuck with what I want to do about security in my BLE architecture.
So far I was able to combine
Hi Johan,
Thanks for clarifying this one out, that is already a great relief. Honestly I'm a little bit stuck with what I want to do about security in my BLE architecture.
So far I was able to combine
|
By
frv
·
#5610
·
|
|
Re: samples: BLE Mesh : finding possibi lities to optimise onoff level lighting vnd app further ?
Hi,
I wanna clarify that Black box means implementation is based on Bluetooth Mesh specification release in 2017 but it is available in close source lib. At app level there are some limited APIs to
Hi,
I wanna clarify that Black box means implementation is based on Bluetooth Mesh specification release in 2017 but it is available in close source lib. At app level there are some limited APIs to
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#5609
·
|
|
Re: BLE OOB - pairing/bonding - local-oob - HCI UART Zephyr issue?
I meant naturally bluetoothd (stupid auto-correct :)
Johan
I meant naturally bluetoothd (stupid auto-correct :)
Johan
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#5608
·
|
|
Re: BLE OOB - pairing/bonding - local-oob - HCI UART Zephyr issue?
Hi,
SSP is a BR/EDR feature, whereas Zephyr on Nordic MCUs only supports LE (known as a single-mode controller). So you’re not missing anything essential in this regard. The security feature in LE
Hi,
SSP is a BR/EDR feature, whereas Zephyr on Nordic MCUs only supports LE (known as a single-mode controller). So you’re not missing anything essential in this regard. The security feature in LE
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#5607
·
|
|
Re: BLE OOB - pairing/bonding - local-oob - HCI UART Zephyr issue?
Hi all, Carles,
It seems when trying to set the SSP (Secure Simple Pairing) via the btmgmt tool I also get the error message the SSP is not supported for this adapter.
So it seems when setting up a
Hi all, Carles,
It seems when trying to set the SSP (Secure Simple Pairing) via the btmgmt tool I also get the error message the SSP is not supported for this adapter.
So it seems when setting up a
|
By
frv
·
#5606
·
|
|
BLE OOB - pairing/bonding - local-oob - HCI UART Zephyr issue?
Hi all, Carles,
During the last months I have been doing a lot of research in BLE technologies.
Finally for implementing our use case we came up with the following BLE architecture:
- a Linux
Hi all, Carles,
During the last months I have been doing a lot of research in BLE technologies.
Finally for implementing our use case we came up with the following BLE architecture:
- a Linux
|
By
frv
·
#5605
·
|
|
Re: samples: BLE Mesh : finding possib =?utf-8?Q?i_lities_to_optimise_onoff_level_lighting_vnd_app_further_??=
Hi, Johan,
I'm researching zephyr ble mesh too, have a questions to ask you:
In zephyr/samples/boards/nrf52/mesh/onoff-app example, use meshctl as the provisioner and configurer, is there a
Hi, Johan,
I'm researching zephyr ble mesh too, have a questions to ask you:
In zephyr/samples/boards/nrf52/mesh/onoff-app example, use meshctl as the provisioner and configurer, is there a
|
By
wxzzzh
·
#5604
·
|
|
Re: samples: BLE Mesh : finding possibi lities to optimise onoff level lighting vnd app further ?
I’m here on the mailing list as well, but I don’t have much knowledge of the “black boxes” of proprietary Mesh products that Vikrant was referring to.
Johan
I’m here on the mailing list as well, but I don’t have much knowledge of the “black boxes” of proprietary Mesh products that Vikrant was referring to.
Johan
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#5603
·
|
|
Re: samples: BLE Mesh : finding possibi =?utf-8?Q?lities_to_optimise_onoff_level_lighting_vnd_app_further_??=
Hi, vikrant,
You can go here: https://zephyrproject.slack.com/messages/C18PLHN8H/convo/C18PLHN8H-1547649579.774500/?cdn_fallback=1
in general channel, talk to Johan Hedberg by @jhe, who's
Hi, vikrant,
You can go here: https://zephyrproject.slack.com/messages/C18PLHN8H/convo/C18PLHN8H-1547649579.774500/?cdn_fallback=1
in general channel, talk to Johan Hedberg by @jhe, who's
|
By
wxzzzh
·
#5602
·
|
|
Re: Deprecating and removing net-app based APIs
Hello,
"Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
+1 for deprecation, -1 for removal in 1.14. 1.14 is supposed to be LTS
release, and we shouldn't leave users who used prior versions
Hello,
"Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
+1 for deprecation, -1 for removal in 1.14. 1.14 is supposed to be LTS
release, and we shouldn't leave users who used prior versions
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#5601
·
|
|
Dev Review Meeting Agenda (Jan 17, 2019)
Here are the discussion items for today’s meeting, if you have any others let me know:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/labels/dev-review
* Target Capabilities / Board Directory Layout
Here are the discussion items for today’s meeting, if you have any others let me know:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/labels/dev-review
* Target Capabilities / Board Directory Layout
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#5600
·
|