|
Re: [Zephyr-users] #BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
This is starting to look more and more like a memory corruption or kernel issue at this point.
I cannot reproduce this easily by running our standard Bluetooth samples, so I am a bit at a loss here.
This is starting to look more and more like a memory corruption or kernel issue at this point.
I cannot reproduce this easily by running our standard Bluetooth samples, so I am a bit at a loss here.
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#4636
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] #BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
Hi to all,
Suddenly get this non-stoppable FAULT
***** BUS FAULT *****
Executing thread ID (thread): 0x20000220
Faulting instruction address: 0x1c9a4
Precise data bus error
Address:
Hi to all,
Suddenly get this non-stoppable FAULT
***** BUS FAULT *****
Executing thread ID (thread): 0x20000220
Faulting instruction address: 0x1c9a4
Precise data bus error
Address:
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#4635
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] #BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
Hi Carles,
Now get these FAULT/OOPS,
***** MPU FAULT ***** Executing thread ID (thread): 0x20001eb0
Faulting instruction address: 0x200006b8
Instruction Access Violation
Fatal fault in thread
Hi Carles,
Now get these FAULT/OOPS,
***** MPU FAULT ***** Executing thread ID (thread): 0x20001eb0
Faulting instruction address: 0x200006b8
Instruction Access Violation
Fatal fault in thread
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#4634
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] #BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
Hi Vikrant,
Thanks for looking into this. It seems like we do not get a buffer back from the command tx
Hi Vikrant,
Thanks for looking into this. It seems like we do not get a buffer back from the command tx
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#4633
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] #BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
Hi Carles,
Input ->
/opt/zephyr-sdk/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/arm-zephyr-eabi/arm-zephyr-eabi-addr2line -e
Hi Carles,
Input ->
/opt/zephyr-sdk/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/arm-zephyr-eabi/arm-zephyr-eabi-addr2line -e
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#4632
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] #BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
If you are using the Zephyr SDK:
path-to-zephyr-sdk/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/arm-zephyr-eabi/arm-zephyr-eabi-addr2line -e zephyr.elf <addr>
Carles
From: Vikrant More
If you are using the Zephyr SDK:
path-to-zephyr-sdk/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/bin/arm-zephyr-eabi/arm-zephyr-eabi-addr2line -e zephyr.elf <addr>
Carles
From: Vikrant More
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#4631
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] #BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
Hi Carles,
I will but don't know, how to do that ?
Hi Carles,
I will but don't know, how to do that ?
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#4630
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-users] #BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
Hi Vikrant,
Can you please run addr2line with this address present in the error log:0x5222?
Thanks,
Carles
From: users@... <users@...>On Behalf Of vikrant8051
Sent: 30 May 2018
Hi Vikrant,
Can you please run addr2line with this address present in the error log:0x5222?
Thanks,
Carles
From: users@... <users@...>On Behalf Of vikrant8051
Sent: 30 May 2018
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#4629
·
|
|
#BluetoothMesh ...about latest kernel OOPS & exception
#bluetoothmesh
Hello World !!
Today after upgrading to v1.12.0-rc2, I'm getting following error while playing with sample code which is inspired from sample/bluetooth/mesh
[bt] [ERR] hci_tx_thread: assert: 'err ==
Hello World !!
Today after upgrading to v1.12.0-rc2, I'm getting following error while playing with sample code which is inspired from sample/bluetooth/mesh
[bt] [ERR] hci_tx_thread: assert: 'err ==
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#4628
·
|
|
Re: How to support multiple defconfigs to be merged?
CONF_FILE is a space-separated list instead of the normal CMake semicolon-separated list.
So doing
set(CONF_FILE "defconfig_1 defconfig_2 defconfig_3")
is expected to work without any upstream
CONF_FILE is a space-separated list instead of the normal CMake semicolon-separated list.
So doing
set(CONF_FILE "defconfig_1 defconfig_2 defconfig_3")
is expected to work without any upstream
|
By
Sebastian Boe
·
#4627
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.12.0-rc2 tagged
Hi all,
We have just tagged Zephyr 1.12.0-rc2.
The merge window for new features has been closed since rc1, and we will continue to merge only bug fixes and documentation until the release is
Hi all,
We have just tagged Zephyr 1.12.0-rc2.
The merge window for new features has been closed since rc1, and we will continue to merge only bug fixes and documentation until the release is
|
By
Maureen Helm
·
#4626
·
|
|
Re: How to support multiple defconfigs to be merged?
Thank you, Mike! Yeah, it is better to have a PR in Zephyr to support this.
Regards,
Jun
From: <devel@...> on behalf of Michael Rosen <michael.r.rosen@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at
Thank you, Mike! Yeah, it is better to have a PR in Zephyr to support this.
Regards,
Jun
From: <devel@...> on behalf of Michael Rosen <michael.r.rosen@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at
|
By
Li, Jun R
·
#4625
·
|
|
Re: How to support multiple defconfigs to be merged?
Jun,
As we discussed, you can use the following to do what you have below in the new cmake system:
set(CONF_FILE “defconfig_1”)
list(APPEND CONF_FILE “defconfig_2”)
list(APPEND
Jun,
As we discussed, you can use the following to do what you have below in the new cmake system:
set(CONF_FILE “defconfig_1”)
list(APPEND CONF_FILE “defconfig_2”)
list(APPEND
|
By
Michael Rosen
·
#4624
·
|
|
How to support multiple defconfigs to be merged?
Hi everyone,
Before Zephyr adopted cmake as the building tool, it supported to merge multiple defconfig files in project’s makefile by the following way:
CONF_FILE = defconfig_1
CONF_FILE
Hi everyone,
Before Zephyr adopted cmake as the building tool, it supported to merge multiple defconfig files in project’s makefile by the following way:
CONF_FILE = defconfig_1
CONF_FILE
|
By
Li, Jun R
·
#4623
·
|
|
POSIX clock_gettime() has meaningless 'tv_nsec' field.
I’ve created Issue 8009 to track this.
The current implementation of clock_gettime() attempts to use the k_cycle_get_32() counter to provide a more accurate notion of time (filling in the
I’ve created Issue 8009 to track this.
The current implementation of clock_gettime() attempts to use the k_cycle_get_32() counter to provide a more accurate notion of time (filling in the
|
By
David Brown
·
#4622
·
|
|
[Bluetooth pairing] psskey_confirm callback is not executing even after successful pairing
Hi,
static void auth_passkey_confirm(struct bt_conn *conn, unsigned int passkey){
printk("\n\rauth_passkey_confirm !!\n\r");
}
static struct bt_conn_auth_cb auth_cb_display = {
Hi,
static void auth_passkey_confirm(struct bt_conn *conn, unsigned int passkey){
printk("\n\rauth_passkey_confirm !!\n\r");
}
static struct bt_conn_auth_cb auth_cb_display = {
|
By
vikrant8051 <vikrant8051@...>
·
#4621
·
|
|
Re: BLE synchronization
Hi Daniel,
Whether a reply is sent in the same connection event really depends on timing between the RX and TX paths, and right now I doubt we can process it in the TIFS 150us window as you point
Hi Daniel,
Whether a reply is sent in the same connection event really depends on timing between the RX and TX paths, and right now I doubt we can process it in the TIFS 150us window as you point
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#4620
·
|
|
BLE synchronization
Hello there,
I want to synchronize an event between a BLE Central and Peripheral with an accuracy of ~1ms. Both devices use a NRF52832 with zephyr.
Using the normal GATT API, there is a significant
Hello there,
I want to synchronize an event between a BLE Central and Peripheral with an accuracy of ~1ms. Both devices use a NRF52832 with zephyr.
Using the normal GATT API, there is a significant
|
By
Daniel Widmann
·
#4619
·
|
|
Re: Device Tree on separated builds
"I have an app that is built on many boards, and I'd like to build the
app only once and the dts for each board."
That is not supported if I am understanding you correctly. Your options are
to
"I have an app that is built on many boards, and I'd like to build the
app only once and the dts for each board."
That is not supported if I am understanding you correctly. Your options are
to
|
By
Sebastian Boe
·
#4618
·
|
|
Device Tree on separated builds
Hi there !
Is there any way to build the device tree on a different bin than the
kernel?
I have an app that is built on many boards, and I'd like to build the
app only once and the dts for each
Hi there !
Is there any way to build the device tree on a different bin than the
kernel?
I have an app that is built on many boards, and I'd like to build the
app only once and the dts for each
|
By
Inaki Malerba <inaki@...>
·
#4617
·
|