|
Re: CMake migration complete
Well that kind of sucks, cause the on Redhat 7.X the newest cmake is
3.6.x.
Will the needed cmake be part of the toolchain ?
- Erwin
Well that kind of sucks, cause the on Redhat 7.X the newest cmake is
3.6.x.
Will the needed cmake be part of the toolchain ?
- Erwin
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#1225
·
|
|
Re: CMake migration complete
PS: Correction; install cmake 3.8.2 or later.
From: Bøe, Sebastian
Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2017 9:42:27 AM
To: zephyr-devel@...; zephyr-users@...
Subject: CMake migration complete
Hi all,
Zephyr
PS: Correction; install cmake 3.8.2 or later.
From: Bøe, Sebastian
Sent: Thursday, 9 November 2017 9:42:27 AM
To: zephyr-devel@...; zephyr-users@...
Subject: CMake migration complete
Hi all,
Zephyr
|
By
Sebastian Boe
·
#1224
·
|
|
CMake migration complete
Hi all,
Zephyr has finally migrated to CMake.
This migration is an important step in a larger effort to make Zephyr
easy to use for application developers working on different platforms
with different
Hi all,
Zephyr has finally migrated to CMake.
This migration is an important step in a larger effort to make Zephyr
easy to use for application developers working on different platforms
with different
|
By
Sebastian Boe
·
#1223
·
|
|
RFC for: "BSD Sockets API: Offloading support"
See PR #4821 , and related links (if so interested ;).
This is an RFC for a solution to offload WiFi communication for SoC's (like TI CC3220SF)
which support a WiFi coprocessor and provide full
See PR #4821 , and related links (if so interested ;).
This is an RFC for a solution to offload WiFi communication for SoC's (like TI CC3220SF)
which support a WiFi coprocessor and provide full
|
By
Gil Pitney
·
#1222
·
|
|
Are we nearing a 1.10 code freeze or what?
Hello,
Taking a hints from IRC and code review comments, it seems that there's
subj. Can we have an official reminder posted please?
P.S.
I think I didn't receive any TSC meeting notes in a while
Hello,
Taking a hints from IRC and code review comments, it seems that there's
subj. Can we have an official reminder posted please?
P.S.
I think I didn't receive any TSC meeting notes in a while
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#1221
·
|
|
How to enable Bluetooth on FRDM_K64F + FRDM_KW41Z
Hello
I am testing FRDM_KW41Z as BLE controller with FRDM_K64F board as BLE host.
I flash hci_blackbox firmware on KW41Z and
I flash zephyr sample peripheral_hr on K64F
I get the following on
Hello
I am testing FRDM_KW41Z as BLE controller with FRDM_K64F board as BLE host.
I flash hci_blackbox firmware on KW41Z and
I flash zephyr sample peripheral_hr on K64F
I get the following on
|
By
Priyanka Rawat <priyanka.rawat@...>
·
#1220
·
|
|
Re: Adding support for the Arduino Zero / SAMD21
Cool, PR sent!
-- Michael
Cool, PR sent!
-- Michael
|
By
Michael Hope <michaelh@...>
·
#1219
·
|
|
Migrating to cmake
Hi,
In case you have not been following discussions here and pull requests on Github, a pull request is currently under review which removes Kbuild and introduced CMake. This is a very close to be
Hi,
In case you have not been following discussions here and pull requests on Github, a pull request is currently under review which removes Kbuild and introduced CMake. This is a very close to be
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#1218
·
|
|
Data Management
Hello Zephyr Community,
How do I write data directly to my host computer without using Bluetooth or wifi while my application is running on my board? Any advice is appreciated!
Thank you,
Tamra
Hello Zephyr Community,
How do I write data directly to my host computer without using Bluetooth or wifi while my application is running on my board? Any advice is appreciated!
Thank you,
Tamra
|
By
Tamra Oyama <tamrako@...>
·
#1217
·
|
|
Re: Adding support for the Arduino Zero / SAMD21
Always happy to take code if you are up to helping maintain it.
What you have on GitHub looks pretty good w/regards to submitting a PR. I’d cleanup the 'net: fix the build rules for drivers/net’
Always happy to take code if you are up to helping maintain it.
What you have on GitHub looks pretty good w/regards to submitting a PR. I’d cleanup the 'net: fix the build rules for drivers/net’
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#1216
·
|
|
Adding support for the Arduino Zero / SAMD21
Hi there. I'm working on adding support for the Cortex-M0+ based SAMD21G18A used in the Arduino Zero, MKR1000, and other boards like the Adafruit Feather M0 series.
I'm pretty happy with it so far -
Hi there. I'm working on adding support for the Cortex-M0+ based SAMD21G18A used in the Arduino Zero, MKR1000, and other boards like the Adafruit Feather M0 series.
I'm pretty happy with it so far -
|
By
Michael Hope <michaelh@...>
·
#1215
·
|
|
Re: bluetooth: mesh: Multi-element node - get-composition status
Hi Johan,
That was the problem. I have the onoff server running successfully on
all 4 elements.
Thanks for your patience,
Steve
Hi Johan,
That was the problem. I have the onoff server running successfully on
all 4 elements.
Thanks for your patience,
Steve
|
By
Steve Brown
·
#1214
·
|
|
Re: bluetooth: mesh: Multi-element node - get-composition status
Hi Steve,
This is purely guess-work since I haven't seen your code, but is it
possible you have the same model instance registered on two elements?
You can only give a model array once to a
Hi Steve,
This is purely guess-work since I haven't seen your code, but is it
possible you have the same model instance registered on two elements?
You can only give a model array once to a
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#1213
·
|
|
Re: bluetooth: mesh: Multi-element node - get-composition status
Hi Johan,
I got a little further after registering the config model only once. I
also had to jack up the L2CAP_TX_BUF_COUNT as all the segments are
queued up before they are transmitted.
I have a
Hi Johan,
I got a little further after registering the config model only once. I
also had to jack up the L2CAP_TX_BUF_COUNT as all the segments are
queued up before they are transmitted.
I have a
|
By
Steve Brown
·
#1212
·
|
|
Re: Kconfig like menu in out of tree app
"Is there a special reason why it is APPLICATION_BASE and not
PROJECT_BASE ?"
I don't know, I have been confused about that myself, I suspect you could
s/APPLICATION_BASE/PROJECT_BASE/
Great that
"Is there a special reason why it is APPLICATION_BASE and not
PROJECT_BASE ?"
I don't know, I have been confused about that myself, I suspect you could
s/APPLICATION_BASE/PROJECT_BASE/
Great that
|
By
Sebastian Boe
·
#1211
·
|
|
Re: Kconfig like menu in out of tree app
Hey Sebastian,
Thanks for the hint, now I got it working after a bit of tuning.
I do have a question;
the test Kconfig has the following code
config ZEPHYR_BASE
string
option
Hey Sebastian,
Thanks for the hint, now I got it working after a bit of tuning.
I do have a question;
the test Kconfig has the following code
config ZEPHYR_BASE
string
option
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#1210
·
|
|
Re: Kconfig like menu in out of tree app
Hi,
"But the Kconfig in ~erwin/zephyr/ is the root of the menuconfig
tree, and that knows nothing about my application in ~erwin/app/"
This is what KBUILD_KCONFIG is for, as you seem to have
Hi,
"But the Kconfig in ~erwin/zephyr/ is the root of the menuconfig
tree, and that knows nothing about my application in ~erwin/app/"
This is what KBUILD_KCONFIG is for, as you seem to have
|
By
Sebastian Boe
·
#1209
·
|
|
Kconfig like menu in out of tree app
Hello all,
is there a way to add menuconfig entries from outside the Zephyr source
tree?
For example having zephyr in ~erwin/zephyr/ and an application in
~erwin/app/. Compiling and configuring
Hello all,
is there a way to add menuconfig entries from outside the Zephyr source
tree?
For example having zephyr in ~erwin/zephyr/ and an application in
~erwin/app/. Compiling and configuring
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#1208
·
|
|
Re: bluetooth: mesh: Multi-element node - get-composition status
On the next and subsequent tests, models on both elements are
functioning as expected.
Thanks again for your help,
Steve
On the next and subsequent tests, models on both elements are
functioning as expected.
Thanks again for your help,
Steve
|
By
Steve Brown
·
#1207
·
|
|
Re: bluetooth: mesh: Multi-element node - get-composition status
Oops, I deleted the configuration model from the secondary element and
provisioning now completes. The secondary element still isn't behaving
properly. It's not binding the model to the secondary
Oops, I deleted the configuration model from the secondary element and
provisioning now completes. The secondary element still isn't behaving
properly. It's not binding the model to the secondary
|
By
Steve Brown
·
#1206
·
|