|
Re: [Zephyr-devil] Tiny tile Zephyr implementation
Jie,
My board is in use at this time so I cannot do this test for you. However I did look at the Bluetooth beacon sample and I see that it is setting some Bluetooth related CONFIG settings that
Jie,
My board is in use at this time so I cannot do this test for you. However I did look at the Bluetooth beacon sample and I see that it is setting some Bluetooth related CONFIG settings that
|
By
Graham Stott <gbcstott1@...>
·
#1100
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-devil] Tiny tile Zephyr implementation
Hi Graham,
Could you flash the beacon example in zephyr? The path is samples/bluetooth/beacon. You might have to flash the hci_uart example, which is also in the bluetooth sample directory, to update
Hi Graham,
Could you flash the beacon example in zephyr? The path is samples/bluetooth/beacon. You might have to flash the hci_uart example, which is also in the bluetooth sample directory, to update
|
By
Jie Zhou <zhoujie@...>
·
#1099
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-devil] Tiny tile Zephyr implementation
Jie,
I do not have the TinyTile board so I cannot try flashing it. However I do have the DFRobot CurieNano which is a similar board. I have no problem flashing this board. I used the instructions
Jie,
I do not have the TinyTile board so I cannot try flashing it. However I do have the DFRobot CurieNano which is a similar board. I have no problem flashing this board. I used the instructions
|
By
Graham Stott <gbcstott1@...>
·
#1098
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-devil] Tiny tile Zephyr implementation
Hi Graham,
Thanks for responding! About the similarities of TinyTILE and Arduino101, although the chip is the same, we have been trying to flash applications to tinyTILE for a while now. The arduino
Hi Graham,
Thanks for responding! About the similarities of TinyTILE and Arduino101, although the chip is the same, we have been trying to flash applications to tinyTILE for a while now. The arduino
|
By
Jie Zhou <zhoujie@...>
·
#1097
·
|
|
stm32f4_disco issues
Hi All,
I'm attempting to flash the samples/basic/blinky/ project on the
stm32f4_disco board, but am running into issues.
Here's a list of steps I run through:
make BOARD=stm32f4_disco -C
Hi All,
I'm attempting to flash the samples/basic/blinky/ project on the
stm32f4_disco board, but am running into issues.
Here's a list of steps I run through:
make BOARD=stm32f4_disco -C
|
By
Pushpal Sidhu
·
#1096
·
|
|
Re: Is there tutorials for Zephyr ticker/mayfly?
Hi biwa,
Please be aware that ticker/mayfly are not Zephyr OS public interfaces,
i.e. applications/samples shall not use them and they will not follow the API deprecation rules,
implementation and
Hi biwa,
Please be aware that ticker/mayfly are not Zephyr OS public interfaces,
i.e. applications/samples shall not use them and they will not follow the API deprecation rules,
implementation and
|
By
Chettimada, Vinayak Kariappa
·
#1095
·
|
|
Re: BSD Sockets in mainline, and how that affects design decisions for the rest of IP stack (e.g. send MTU handling)
The userspace work has progressed to the point where we have enough confidence in the API design to open up the design discussion to a larger audience; until now enough things have been in flux (or
The userspace work has progressed to the point where we have enough confidence in the API design to open up the design discussion to a larger audience; until now enough things have been in flux (or
|
By
Boie, Andrew P
·
#1094
·
|
|
Re: BSD Sockets in mainline, and how that affects design decisions for the rest of IP stack (e.g. send MTU handling)
Hello Jukka,
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#1093
·
|
|
Re: BSD Sockets in mainline, and how that affects design decisions for the rest of IP stack (e.g. send MTU handling)
Hello,
"Nashif, Anas" <anas.nashif@...> wrote:
Yes, looking at Jukka's response, I must have failed miserably to
convey what I propose. I propose:
1. To reject approach to the send MTU
Hello,
"Nashif, Anas" <anas.nashif@...> wrote:
Yes, looking at Jukka's response, I must have failed miserably to
convey what I propose. I propose:
1. To reject approach to the send MTU
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#1092
·
|
|
Re: BSD Sockets in mainline, and how that affects design decisions for the rest of IP stack (e.g. send MTU handling)
Hi Anas,
Afaik a lot of ram is spent on buffers and if we can't do zero-copy
that means at very least one extra buffer has to exist to move data
around, fine-tuning the buffer size is also tricky
Hi Anas,
Afaik a lot of ram is spent on buffers and if we can't do zero-copy
that means at very least one extra buffer has to exist to move data
around, fine-tuning the buffer size is also tricky
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#1091
·
|
|
Re: BSD Sockets in mainline, and how that affects design decisions for the rest of IP stack (e.g. send MTU handling)
Paul,
You gave very detailed background information and listed issues we had in the past but it was not clear what you are proposing, we do have sockets already, are you suggesting we should move
Paul,
You gave very detailed background information and listed issues we had in the past but it was not clear what you are proposing, we do have sockets already, are you suggesting we should move
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#1090
·
|
|
Re: Is there tutorials for Zephyr ticker/mayfly?
Thanks for all.
I can not understand ticker/mayfly yet.
My 'UNCLEAR POINT' is,
:ticker
What is node?
What is user?
What is slot?
What is TRIGGER/WORKER/JOB?
:mayfly
What is CALLEE/CALLER?
2017-10-09
Thanks for all.
I can not understand ticker/mayfly yet.
My 'UNCLEAR POINT' is,
:ticker
What is node?
What is user?
What is slot?
What is TRIGGER/WORKER/JOB?
:mayfly
What is CALLEE/CALLER?
2017-10-09
|
By
loquat3
·
#1089
·
|
|
Re: BSD Sockets in mainline, and how that affects design decisions for the rest of IP stack (e.g. send MTU handling)
Hi,
We can certainly implement something like this for the net_context
APIs. There is at least one issue with this as it is currently not
easy to pass information to application how much data we are
Hi,
We can certainly implement something like this for the net_context
APIs. There is at least one issue with this as it is currently not
easy to pass information to application how much data we are
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#1088
·
|
|
Linar Connecto 2017 presentations
Some Zephyr related presentations for those who could not attend
Linaro Connect in SF:
- Deploy STM32 family on Zephyr – SFO17-102
http://connect.linaro.org/resource/sfo17/sfo17-102/
- An update
Some Zephyr related presentations for those who could not attend
Linaro Connect in SF:
- Deploy STM32 family on Zephyr – SFO17-102
http://connect.linaro.org/resource/sfo17/sfo17-102/
- An update
|
By
Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...>
·
#1087
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-devil] Tiny tile Zephyr implementation
I meant to also say to look at projects for Arduino/Genuine 101 as tiny Tile is a scaled down version of this board.
I meant to also say to look at projects for Arduino/Genuine 101 as tiny Tile is a scaled down version of this board.
|
By
Graham Stott <gbcstott1@...>
·
#1086
·
|
|
Re: Tinytile Zephyr implementation
As tinyTile is basically just a version of the Intel® Curie™ module, you can look for projects under Curie. Yes. It has additional pins but the rest is the same
Graham
As tinyTile is basically just a version of the Intel® Curie™ module, you can look for projects under Curie. Yes. It has additional pins but the rest is the same
Graham
|
By
Graham Stott <gbcstott1@...>
·
#1085
·
|
|
BSD Sockets in mainline, and how that affects design decisions for the rest of IP stack (e.g. send MTU handling)
Hello,
There was an RFC on this list to implement BSD Sockets API
compatibility layer for Zephyr some 6 months ago. Majority of that
functionality went into the 1.9 release (with some additional
Hello,
There was an RFC on this list to implement BSD Sockets API
compatibility layer for Zephyr some 6 months ago. Majority of that
functionality went into the 1.9 release (with some additional
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#1084
·
|
|
Tinytile Zephyr implementation
Hi All,
Has anyone done anything with tinyTILE? Since the board is quite new I was wondering if someone has done a project with Zephyr OS on tinyTILE. The specs of the chip looks promising for IoT
Hi All,
Has anyone done anything with tinyTILE? Since the board is quite new I was wondering if someone has done a project with Zephyr OS on tinyTILE. The specs of the chip looks promising for IoT
|
By
Jie Zhou <zhoujie@...>
·
#1083
·
|
|
Re: Any plan to support ST BlueNRG chips?
Hi Aaron,
BlueNRG chip are actually already supported (even if deeper testing would be welcome).
To activate it, you could have a look to Disco L475 IoT board configuration.
Cheers
Erwan
Hi Aaron,
BlueNRG chip are actually already supported (even if deeper testing would be welcome).
To activate it, you could have a look to Disco L475 IoT board configuration.
Cheers
Erwan
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#1082
·
|
|
Any plan to support ST BlueNRG chips?
Hi,
I saw zephyr will support ST BlueNRG in 1.8 in a PPT file.
But looks zephyr still did't support it.
Do you any information about supporting BlueNRG planing?
Regards,
Aaron
Hi,
I saw zephyr will support ST BlueNRG in 1.8 in a PPT file.
But looks zephyr still did't support it.
Do you any information about supporting BlueNRG planing?
Regards,
Aaron
|
By
Aaron Xu
·
#1081
·
|