|
Patch for zephyr 1.6 which includes deep sleep for quark_se
Hi
In Zephyr 1.7 , the implementation for deep sleep for quark_se is done
We have finalized our application based on zephyr 1.6. In this version deep sleep implementation for quark_se is NOT
Hi
In Zephyr 1.7 , the implementation for deep sleep for quark_se is done
We have finalized our application based on zephyr 1.6. In this version deep sleep implementation for quark_se is NOT
|
By
Mahendravarman Rajarao (RBEI/EAA10) <Mahendravarman.Rajarao@...>
·
#580
·
|
|
Re: Support for Open Thread
Hi,
I’ve done a proof-of-concept port of OpenThread to Zephyr. It’s a very basic port which I’ve tested on nrf52840. It used to work about 2 months ago but I haven’t done any rebases onto
Hi,
I’ve done a proof-of-concept port of OpenThread to Zephyr. It’s a very basic port which I’ve tested on nrf52840. It used to work about 2 months ago but I haven’t done any rebases onto
|
By
Bober, Wojciech <Wojciech.Bober@...>
·
#579
·
|
|
Support for Open Thread
Hi,
May I know if Open Thread is going to be supported ?. if so, is there a timeline? Thank you.
Hi,
May I know if Open Thread is going to be supported ?. if so, is there a timeline? Thank you.
|
By
Albert
·
#578
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr 1.8-rc1 tagged
Blah! I missed the "Message clipped" link at the bottom of my GMail window. Well, that's a little embarrassing, thanks for clearing it up!
Marti
Blah! I missed the "Message clipped" link at the bottom of my GMail window. Well, that's a little embarrassing, thanks for clearing it up!
Marti
|
By
Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...>
·
#577
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr 1.8-rc1 tagged
Hi Marti,
You should re-check, because I can see them :
Marti Bolivar (18):
arm: cortex-m: allow configurable ROM offset
net/buf.h: fix copy-paste Doxygen error
zephyr-env.sh:
Hi Marti,
You should re-check, because I can see them :
Marti Bolivar (18):
arm: cortex-m: allow configurable ROM offset
net/buf.h: fix copy-paste Doxygen error
zephyr-env.sh:
|
By
Neil Armstrong
·
#576
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr 1.8-rc1 tagged
Hi Anas,
Glad to see the release!
There may be some issue with how the shortlog is being generated, though; I don't see any of my commits below ;). I do see them in the output for "git shortlog
Hi Anas,
Glad to see the release!
There may be some issue with how the shortlog is being generated, though; I don't see any of my commits below ;). I do see them in the output for "git shortlog
|
By
Marti Bolivar <marti.bolivar@...>
·
#575
·
|
|
Re: STM32 Support Roadmap
Hi Neil, all,
I can only acknowledge that, despite hard work from community, we still currently miss important drivers
on STM32 SoCs.
On ST side, roadmap was to port Disco L475 IoT board, and after
Hi Neil, all,
I can only acknowledge that, despite hard work from community, we still currently miss important drivers
on STM32 SoCs.
On ST side, roadmap was to port Disco L475 IoT board, and after
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#574
·
|
|
Re: STM32 Support Roadmap
If you're talking about my picking up Christer's previous work I'm only experimentally kicking the tyres here (and mostly in my spare time); I'm not working to any particular roadmap...
Daniel.
If you're talking about my picking up Christer's previous work I'm only experimentally kicking the tyres here (and mostly in my spare time); I'm not working to any particular roadmap...
Daniel.
|
By
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...>
·
#573
·
|
|
Re: STM32 Support Roadmap
Hi Paul,
Yes, but since you were already working on it, I removed it from the list.
But Yes, it is important, and having a clean support here is critical.
I still plan to take a look on the DW code
Hi Paul,
Yes, but since you were already working on it, I removed it from the list.
But Yes, it is important, and having a clean support here is critical.
I still plan to take a look on the DW code
|
By
Neil Armstrong
·
#572
·
|
|
Re: STM32 Support Roadmap
Hello Neil,
I'm surprised to not see USB (at least device-side) support below. I'd
think USB is a popular and generic interface to pose enough interest
for wide array of users, and indeed, I know
Hello Neil,
I'm surprised to not see USB (at least device-side) support below. I'd
think USB is a popular and generic interface to pose enough interest
for wide array of users, and indeed, I know
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#571
·
|
|
Re: STM32 Support Roadmap
Hello All,
A "me too" message ;-) I have several STM32F4 projects and am very
interested to use Zephyr for them. The MCU's are STM32F407 and STM32F417
(with 512k or 1M Flash).
Device drivers I am
Hello All,
A "me too" message ;-) I have several STM32F4 projects and am very
interested to use Zephyr for them. The MCU's are STM32F407 and STM32F417
(with 512k or 1M Flash).
Device drivers I am
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#570
·
|
|
STM32 Support Roadmap
Hi Erwann, Zephyr community,
I'm wondering about the next steps for the STM32 Platform support.
First of all, I'm still trying to push a SPI driver for STM32Lx, but it seems it could work
on STM32Fx
Hi Erwann, Zephyr community,
I'm wondering about the next steps for the STM32 Platform support.
First of all, I'm still trying to push a SPI driver for STM32Lx, but it seems it could work
on STM32Fx
|
By
Neil Armstrong
·
#569
·
|
|
Re: STM32F4 Ethernet driver
Hey Erwan,
yes, I have several projects with STM32F4 MCU's where I have Ethernet
(and RS485, CAN) and currently work with the STM Cube, and the sooner I
can get rid of STM Cube the better :-)
Since
Hey Erwan,
yes, I have several projects with STM32F4 MCU's where I have Ethernet
(and RS485, CAN) and currently work with the STM Cube, and the sooner I
can get rid of STM Cube the better :-)
Since
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#568
·
|
|
Re: STM32F4 Ethernet driver
Hi Erwin,
I'm not aware of anyone working on this. Do you intend to work on it?
Erwan
Hi Erwin,
I'm not aware of anyone working on this. Do you intend to work on it?
Erwan
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#567
·
|
|
Stable releases 1.6.1 and 1.7.1
Hi,
We are pleased to announce the stable update releases to both Zephyr 1.7 and 1.6. The updates consist of bug fixes and updates to crypto related components. Below is the list of the changes for
Hi,
We are pleased to announce the stable update releases to both Zephyr 1.7 and 1.6. The updates consist of bug fixes and updates to crypto related components. Below is the list of the changes for
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#566
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.8-rc1 tagged
Hi,
2 weeks later than planned we are pleased to announce that 1.8-rc1 has been tagged signaling the end of the merge window and the start of the bug fix and stabilisation cycle for Zephyr 1.8.
Hi,
2 weeks later than planned we are pleased to announce that 1.8-rc1 has been tagged signaling the end of the merge window and the start of the bug fix and stabilisation cycle for Zephyr 1.8.
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#565
·
|
|
STM32F4 Ethernet driver
Hello,
I was wondering if someone is already working on a STM32F4 Ethernet
driver?
- Erwin
Hello,
I was wondering if someone is already working on a STM32F4 Ethernet
driver?
- Erwin
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#564
·
|
|
Zephyr SDK 0.9.1 released
Hi,
Zephyr SDK 0.9.1 has been released and is available for download from:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/meta-zephyr-sdk/releases/download/0.9.1/zephyr-sdk-0.9.1-setup.run
Release
Hi,
Zephyr SDK 0.9.1 has been released and is available for download from:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/meta-zephyr-sdk/releases/download/0.9.1/zephyr-sdk-0.9.1-setup.run
Release
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#563
·
|
|
Re: Zephyr SDK 0.9.1-rc
Hi Jammy,
No, it is not included in this bug fix release. We will address this in 0.10
Anas
Hi Jammy,
No, it is not included in this bug fix release. We will address this in 0.10
Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#562
·
|
|
Re: Porting Zephyr to STM32F103C8T6 Minimum System Development Board
Hi Siddharth,
Switch should be created by ext/hal/st/stm32cube/Makefile from CONFIG_SOC flag.
The right way to configure this flag is to define your SoC in
Hi Siddharth,
Switch should be created by ext/hal/st/stm32cube/Makefile from CONFIG_SOC flag.
The right way to configure this flag is to define your SoC in
|
By
Erwan Gouriou
·
#561
·
|