|
Re: K_NO_WAIT, K_FOREVER and kernel APIs
Hi Carles,
I though k_timer wouldn't be that useful after k_work/k_delayed_work
was introduced, especially given its blocking nature it usually much
easier to just use the system work queue, though
Hi Carles,
I though k_timer wouldn't be that useful after k_work/k_delayed_work
was introduced, especially given its blocking nature it usually much
easier to just use the system work queue, though
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#837
·
|
|
Re: K_NO_WAIT, K_FOREVER and kernel APIs
Hi Carles,
As you describe the behavior it sounds like a bug to me that, indeed, needs a fix.
Tomasz
Hi Carles,
As you describe the behavior it sounds like a bug to me that, indeed, needs a fix.
Tomasz
|
By
Tomasz Bursztyka
·
#836
·
|
|
Re: Direct flash access from filesystem
Hi,
By
Carles Cufi
·
#835
·
|
|
K_NO_WAIT, K_FOREVER and kernel APIs
Hi all,
We've had 2 different issues recently coming from the fact that K_NO_WAIT and K_FOREVER do not seem to work with all of the kernel APIs. They are the following:
1) Calling k_timer_start()
Hi all,
We've had 2 different issues recently coming from the fact that K_NO_WAIT and K_FOREVER do not seem to work with all of the kernel APIs. They are the following:
1) Calling k_timer_start()
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#834
·
|
|
Re: Direct flash access from filesystem
Hello Andrzej,
Andrzej Kaczmarek <andrzej.kaczmarek@...> wrote:
Well, NFFS is a *flash* filesystem, it's expected that it would
require more specific underlying device type than a generic FS
Hello Andrzej,
Andrzej Kaczmarek <andrzej.kaczmarek@...> wrote:
Well, NFFS is a *flash* filesystem, it's expected that it would
require more specific underlying device type than a generic FS
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#833
·
|
|
Direct flash access from filesystem
Hi all,
I'm porting NFFS (Newtron Flash File System) from Mynewt to Zephyr. The original fs implementation has direct access to flash, i.e. it will read, write and erase data to/from flash directly
Hi all,
I'm porting NFFS (Newtron Flash File System) from Mynewt to Zephyr. The original fs implementation has direct access to flash, i.e. it will read, write and erase data to/from flash directly
|
By
Andrzej Kaczmarek
·
#832
·
|
|
Re: ADC driver and power management API
By the way, is ADC API going to be revised soon or is it actual and sufficient?
Michał Kruszewski
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
By the way, is ADC API going to be revised soon or is it actual and sufficient?
Michał Kruszewski
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
|
By
Michał Kruszewski <mkru@...>
·
#831
·
|
|
A question for the default value of config option in Kconfig
Hi
I am just working on ARC em starter_kit. There are several configurations for em_starter_kit, em7d, em9d, em11d.
Different configurations have different parameters, i.e. the default value
Hi
I am just working on ARC em starter_kit. There are several configurations for em_starter_kit, em7d, em9d, em11d.
Different configurations have different parameters, i.e. the default value
|
By
Wayne Ren
·
#830
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.9.0-rc1 tagged
Hi all,
We have just tagged Zephyr 1.9.0 RC1 which mean we are feature frozen for the 1.9 release planned for the end of August.
Starting with RC1 we will only accept changes introducing bug
Hi all,
We have just tagged Zephyr 1.9.0 RC1 which mean we are feature frozen for the 1.9 release planned for the end of August.
Starting with RC1 we will only accept changes introducing bug
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#829
·
|
|
RFCv2: Replacing Make/Kbuild with CMake
Hi all,
I am resending this email, slightly modified from its original version, since the work on the build system has resumed and we would like to fish for early feedback regarding the work that
Hi all,
I am resending this email, slightly modified from its original version, since the work on the build system has resumed and we would like to fish for early feedback regarding the work that
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#828
·
|
|
Re: ADC driver and power management API
Hi Piotr,
Good point. ADC API was designed some months before PM one, and was not revised once the later came in.
Sounds like you can throw a PR to remove these.
Hi Piotr,
Good point. ADC API was designed some months before PM one, and was not revised once the later came in.
Sounds like you can throw a PR to remove these.
|
By
Tomasz Bursztyka
·
#827
·
|
|
ADC driver and power management API
Hi all,
The ADC driver API specifies adc_enable / adc_disable functions. The doxygen documentation of adc_enable function states: "This routine enables the ADC hardware block for data
Hi all,
The ADC driver API specifies adc_enable / adc_disable functions. The doxygen documentation of adc_enable function states: "This routine enables the ADC hardware block for data
|
By
Piotr Mienkowski
·
#826
·
|
|
Re: Nucleo f030r8 fails at QEMU Cortex M3 test
The deeper context here is that we have a number of timing-sensitive tests which sometimes fall over if the server running sanitycheck is heavily loaded. AFAICT, this is due to QEMU trying to
The deeper context here is that we have a number of timing-sensitive tests which sometimes fall over if the server running sanitycheck is heavily loaded. AFAICT, this is due to QEMU trying to
|
By
Boie, Andrew P
·
#825
·
|
|
Re: Nucleo f030r8 fails at QEMU Cortex M3 test
Hi,
There was an issue in how we re-run sanitycheck on failed tests (retry) to eliminate false positive due to heavy load and Qemu not being able to deal with that. This is now fixed.
Anas
Hi,
There was an issue in how we re-run sanitycheck on failed tests (retry) to eliminate false positive due to heavy load and Qemu not being able to deal with that. This is now fixed.
Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#824
·
|
|
Re: Nucleo f030r8 fails at QEMU Cortex M3 test
Hello Maciej,
Maciej Dębski <maciej.debski@...> wrote:
*All* tests fail sooner or later, with or without a reason. (As Murphy
would add, non-tests fail sooner or later too.) If you're sure
Hello Maciej,
Maciej Dębski <maciej.debski@...> wrote:
*All* tests fail sooner or later, with or without a reason. (As Murphy
would add, non-tests fail sooner or later too.) If you're sure
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#823
·
|
|
Nucleo f030r8 fails at QEMU Cortex M3 test
Hello,
I just posted a pull request for my nucleo f030r8 support. Here it is:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/1103
The shippable ran all the tests correctly, just one with a failure,
Hello,
I just posted a pull request for my nucleo f030r8 support. Here it is:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/1103
The shippable ran all the tests correctly, just one with a failure,
|
By
Maciej Dębski <maciej.debski@...>
·
#821
·
|
|
Nucleo f030r8 fails at QEMU Cortex M3 test
Hello,
I just posted a pull request for my nucleo f030r8 support. Here it is:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/1103
The shippable ran all the tests correctly, just one with a failure,
Hello,
I just posted a pull request for my nucleo f030r8 support. Here it is:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/1103
The shippable ran all the tests correctly, just one with a failure,
|
By
Maciej Dębski <maciej.debski@...>
·
#822
·
|
|
Re: Bluetooth Mesh - configuration server client and helth server client models
Hi Jehudi,
The Client models would typically be operated by a device with a rich &
interactive user interface. As something like that is rarely found on
Zephyr-based device only the Server models are
Hi Jehudi,
The Client models would typically be operated by a device with a rich &
interactive user interface. As something like that is rarely found on
Zephyr-based device only the Server models are
|
By
Johan Hedberg
·
#820
·
|
|
Bluetooth Mesh - configuration server client and helth server client models
Hi,
In the bluetooth mesh samples it is shown how to set-up and use the configuration server and health server root models. Is there also an example on how to use the configuration client and health
Hi,
In the bluetooth mesh samples it is shown how to set-up and use the configuration server and health server root models. Is there also an example on how to use the configuration client and health
|
By
laczenJMS
·
#819
·
|
|
Re: How to figure out the stack size for a thread?
Great! Thank you, Mike and Andrew!
From: Michael Rosen <michael.r.rosen@...>
Date: Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 11:41
To: "Li, Jun R" <jun.r.li@...>, "zephyr-devel@..." <zephyr-devel@...>
Subject:
Great! Thank you, Mike and Andrew!
From: Michael Rosen <michael.r.rosen@...>
Date: Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 11:41
To: "Li, Jun R" <jun.r.li@...>, "zephyr-devel@..." <zephyr-devel@...>
Subject:
|
By
Li, Jun R
·
#818
·
|