|
Re: GitHub workflow issue: Dismissing your own review
Hello Yannis,
Yannis Damigos <giannis.damigos@...> wrote:
[]
Thanks for confirming this. I by now also submitted a Github report,
it borders on a bug that a review author can't dismiss their
Hello Yannis,
Yannis Damigos <giannis.damigos@...> wrote:
[]
Thanks for confirming this. I by now also submitted a Github report,
it borders on a bug that a review author can't dismiss their
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#725
·
|
|
Re: GitHub workflow issue: Dismissing your own review
<paul.sokolovsky@...> wrote:
Hello,
https://help.github.com/articles/dismissing-a-pull-request-review
mentions "repository administrators or people with write access can
dismiss a
<paul.sokolovsky@...> wrote:
Hello,
https://help.github.com/articles/dismissing-a-pull-request-review
mentions "repository administrators or people with write access can
dismiss a
|
By
Yannis Damigos
·
#724
·
|
|
GitHub workflow issue: Dismissing your own review
Hello,
I spotted a following issue: if I gave negative ("change requested")
review (or just the same, positive review), I don't seem to be able to
change it back to "no review".
For example, if I
Hello,
I spotted a following issue: if I gave negative ("change requested")
review (or just the same, positive review), I don't seem to be able to
change it back to "no review".
For example, if I
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#723
·
|
|
STM32F0 nucleo board support CORRECTION
Hello,
quick correction. I am doing support for NUCLEO-F030R8 specifically (which includes the F0 family anyway).
Sorry for misleading information in the previous message.
Yours faithfully,
Maciej
Hello,
quick correction. I am doing support for NUCLEO-F030R8 specifically (which includes the F0 family anyway).
Sorry for misleading information in the previous message.
Yours faithfully,
Maciej
|
By
Maciej Dębski <m.debski.it@...>
·
#722
·
|
|
STM32F0 nucleo board support.
Hello,
I am going to work on the STM32F0 support for Zephyr for the next 2-3 weeks. If there is already such a project in development, let me know! If you would like to help me or give some advices,
Hello,
I am going to work on the STM32F0 support for Zephyr for the next 2-3 weeks. If there is already such a project in development, let me know! If you would like to help me or give some advices,
|
By
Maciej Dębski <m.debski.it@...>
·
#721
·
|
|
Re: qemu_x86 targets now have MMU enabled
Hello,
"Boie, Andrew P" <andrew.p.boie@...> wrote:
To follow up, this indeed highlighted various issues in the code,
e.g. with networking subsystem, for
Hello,
"Boie, Andrew P" <andrew.p.boie@...> wrote:
To follow up, this indeed highlighted various issues in the code,
e.g. with networking subsystem, for
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#720
·
|
|
RFC: I2S (Inter-IC Sound) driver API
Hi all,
I have prepared a proposal for the I2S (Inter-IC Sound) driver API.
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/745
The list of the most important design decision I've made
Hi all,
I have prepared a proposal for the I2S (Inter-IC Sound) driver API.
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/745
The list of the most important design decision I've made
|
By
Piotr Mienkowski
·
#719
·
|
|
Re: Flash drivers compatibility attitude
This does make sense. Having the get API makes the code very simple
for the majority of devices where the sector sizes are uniform in
size. The only thing is that if code needs to know if the
This does make sense. Having the get API makes the code very simple
for the majority of devices where the sector sizes are uniform in
size. The only thing is that if code needs to know if the
|
By
David Brown
·
#718
·
|
|
Re: Flash drivers compatibility attitude
Hi David. Thanks for your answer.
Bellow I responds to your comments:
I totally agree.
Agree on that - driver shouldn’t break hardware specification If hw doesn't allow rewrites then driver
Hi David. Thanks for your answer.
Bellow I responds to your comments:
I totally agree.
Agree on that - driver shouldn’t break hardware specification If hw doesn't allow rewrites then driver
|
By
Puzdrowski, Andrzej
·
#717
·
|
|
qemu_x86 targets now have MMU enabled
We enabled the MMU with an identity page table for the qemu_x86 and qemu_x86_iamcu board targets. Branching off to bad memory addresses, dereferencing NULL pointers, etc should now trigger page faults
We enabled the MMU with an identity page table for the qemu_x86 and qemu_x86_iamcu board targets. Branching off to bad memory addresses, dereferencing NULL pointers, etc should now trigger page faults
|
By
Boie, Andrew P
·
#716
·
|
|
Re: Flash drivers compatibility attitude
There does have to be some knowledge of what the flash device is doing
in order for an application to be able to use the flash robustly.
However, at least all of the drivers that I've used will write
There does have to be some knowledge of what the flash device is doing
in order for an application to be able to use the flash robustly.
However, at least all of the drivers that I've used will write
|
By
David Brown
·
#715
·
|
|
Issue #682
Hi,
Since it seems this issue is flying under the radar lets have it first
discussed here since there might be implemented for the general design
of many kernel
Hi,
Since it seems this issue is flying under the radar lets have it first
discussed here since there might be implemented for the general design
of many kernel
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#714
·
|
|
crypto/hash/crc
Hello All,
I was looking into the STM32 CRYPT, HASH and CRC32 units and how they
fit in Zephyr and could not really figure it out.
There is a drivers/crypto/ with some "real" drivers for doing
Hello All,
I was looking into the STM32 CRYPT, HASH and CRC32 units and how they
fit in Zephyr and could not really figure it out.
There is a drivers/crypto/ with some "real" drivers for doing
|
By
Erwin Rol
·
#713
·
|
|
Re: Flash drivers compatibility attitude
Hello Andrzej,
"Puzdrowski, Andrzej" <Andrzej.Puzdrowski@...> wrote:
I can't say much about Flash API, but the above paragraph reminds me
well about my own thoughts/wording about following
Hello Andrzej,
"Puzdrowski, Andrzej" <Andrzej.Puzdrowski@...> wrote:
I can't say much about Flash API, but the above paragraph reminds me
well about my own thoughts/wording about following
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#712
·
|
|
Re: FRDM-K64F GPIO
You need to prefix the name with CONFIG_ and drop the quotes. Try this instead:
#define GPIO_DRV_NAME CONFIG_GPIO_MCUX_PORTB_NAME
If you take a peek at
You need to prefix the name with CONFIG_ and drop the quotes. Try this instead:
#define GPIO_DRV_NAME CONFIG_GPIO_MCUX_PORTB_NAME
If you take a peek at
|
By
Maureen Helm
·
#711
·
|
|
Re: FRDM-K64F GPIO
Okay Thank you,
but when I tried following Code
#include <zephyr.h>
#include <misc/printk.h>
#include <device.h>
#include <gpio.h>
#define GPIO_DRV_NAME "GPIO_MCUX_PORTB_NAME"
....
gipo_dev =
Okay Thank you,
but when I tried following Code
#include <zephyr.h>
#include <misc/printk.h>
#include <device.h>
#include <gpio.h>
#define GPIO_DRV_NAME "GPIO_MCUX_PORTB_NAME"
....
gipo_dev =
|
By
Kevin Stöckl <k_stoeckl@...>
·
#710
·
|
|
Re: FRDM-K64F GPIO
The gpio driver names are defined in drivers/gpio/Kconfig.mcux
From: zephyr-devel-bounces@... [mailto:zephyr-devel-bounces@...]On Behalf Of Kevin Stöckl
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 8:41 AM
To:
The gpio driver names are defined in drivers/gpio/Kconfig.mcux
From: zephyr-devel-bounces@... [mailto:zephyr-devel-bounces@...]On Behalf Of Kevin Stöckl
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 8:41 AM
To:
|
By
Maureen Helm
·
#709
·
|
|
FRDM-K64F GPIO
Hello,
where did i get the GPIO_DRV_NAME for the FRDM-K64F Board?
Virenfrei. www.avast.com
Hello,
where did i get the GPIO_DRV_NAME for the FRDM-K64F Board?
Virenfrei. www.avast.com
|
By
Kevin Stöckl <k_stoeckl@...>
·
#708
·
|
|
Flash drivers compatibility attitude
In my opinion Flash driver API hasn’t well-defined common behavior. It could cause additional complexity in component added on top of flash driver because the incompatibility must be deferred at
In my opinion Flash driver API hasn’t well-defined common behavior. It could cause additional complexity in component added on top of flash driver because the incompatibility must be deferred at
|
By
Puzdrowski, Andrzej
·
#707
·
|
|
Re: Intel kills off Embedded Boards
Don't you think this article is just a both overstated?
Companies do discontinue boards from time to time. It's normal. There remain plenty of zephyr-supported boards to choose from:
Don't you think this article is just a both overstated?
Companies do discontinue boards from time to time. It's normal. There remain plenty of zephyr-supported boards to choose from:
|
By
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...>
·
#706
·
|