devel@lists.zephyrproject.org

Re: [EXT] Re: [Zephyr-devel] cy8ckit_062_wifi_bt_m0 board issue

Hi Gerson Thank you for replying me. My board is PSoC6 WiFi-BT Pioneer Kit, Exactly the same as the boards on the Zephyr website. The link I refer to is

By Chen, Jason <jason.chen@...> · #8292 ·

Re: cy8ckit_062_wifi_bt_m0 board issue

Hi Jason, Are you using P13-0, P13-1 ? See below: The PSoC-6 has a weird connection with an onboard psoc programmer. It uses the same pins from the Arduino UART Connector. To enable shields, uart was

By nandojve@... · #8291 ·

Re: SPI problem

The default is active low. That is why the only other flash is active high.

By Allen Curtis · #8290 ·

cy8ckit_062_wifi_bt_m0 board issue

Hi all I have downloaded the zephyr project completely, I plan to use the cy8ckit_062_wifi_bt_m0 board, I have built successfully, there is no error, but there is no log output in the

By Chen, Jason <jason.chen@...> · #8289 ·

SPI problem

Hi, is there an option to run SPI on zephyr driver with MOSI with option Active_Low? I would really appreciate your answer. Best regards, Dominika

By Dominika Sułot <dominikasulot@...> · #8288 ·

Re: Why use net_if_get_first_by_type(...) instead of net_if_get_default in dhcp4 test case from v.2.6.0. #net #test

Hi, the unit test programs are self contained i.e., they do not need any external network connections to verify functionality. If the unit test is run in a board that has for example Ethernet support,

By Jukka Rissanen · #8287 ·

Why use net_if_get_first_by_type(...) instead of net_if_get_default in dhcp4 test case from v.2.6.0. #net #test

In my opinion, is using net_if_get_default more appropriate than using net_if_get_first_by_type(&NET_L2_GET_NAME(DUMMY)) in tests/net/dhcpv4/src/main.c:434? Reason: If using the

By yunkai@... · #8286 ·

Networking using QEMU ARC

Hi I have an issue in doing networking using qemu arc I tried SLIP networking using civetweb/http_server Same can work with QEMU_CORTEX_A9 and QEMU_X86 But cannot work with QEMU_ARC_EM

By joby <joby.thampan@...> · #8285 ·

Re: MISRA

I agree. I don't know why that test and a couple others were created. This is demonstrably extremely brittle and untrustworthy. Nicolas

By Nicolas Pitre <nico@...> · #8284 ·

Re: MISRA

I confirm that this is ugly (and dangerous) as hell and I really hope that this is not taken for granted in any part of Zephyr code. Once said that it is not surprising that compiler don't have

By Abramo Bagnara · #8283 ·

Re: MISRA

volatile long long_max = LONG_MAX; volatile long long_one = 1L; void test_limits(void) { zassert_true((long_max + long_one == LONG_MIN), NULL); } It is an undefined behavior per one of your

By Nicolas Pitre <nico@...> · #8282 ·

Re: MISRA

No, I simply keep stating the obvious: you can test a finite number of instances but not all of them and a compiler is free to bite you where you don't expect that (just like you are free to infringe

By Abramo Bagnara · #8281 ·

Re: MISRA

For the n-th time I'll repeat this: it can be tested. In this particular case it is extensively tested by the CI infrastructure. In the unlikely event one compiler implementation decides to

By Nicolas Pitre <nico@...> · #8280 ·

Re: MISRA

The law enforcement analogy is completely misdriven: our case is not related to your freedom to do something (I assure you that you are perfectly free to introduce undefined behaviors in your

By Abramo Bagnara · #8279 ·

Re: MISRA

No. I disagree to such dogmatic stance. But let's start with a few facts of life. Did you know it is illegal to change a light bulb yourself if you live in Victoria, Australia? Did you know that

By Nicolas Pitre <nico@...> · #8278 ·

Re: MISRA

As long as there is still an undefined behavior in the code, I'd like you resign yourself to the fact that this cannot be accepted. Let me try another time to explain, I hope to not make you bored

By Abramo Bagnara · #8277 ·

Re: MISRA

Is that the case? If so I missed it. One thing that could help you get proper reviews is to split your PR in smaller chunks. Your original change is way too big. Maybe that particular part was OK,

By Nicolas Pitre · #8276 ·

Re: MISRA

Well... I took this as a challenge and attempted it. And it didn't work satisfactorily. The problem is that the buf pointer accomplishes two roles: it serves as a buffer offset as well as a memory

By Nicolas Pitre <nico@...> · #8275 ·

Re: MISRA

IOW you are proposing to do exactly what I presented the first time, but inverting the boolean logic from original true for failure and false for success to false for failure and true for success. It

By Abramo Bagnara · #8274 ·

Re: MISRA

I'm truly sad saying that, but if you keep stating that to write code that has undefined behavior for C standard and such behavior is not a documented compiler extensions is a sane thing to do, I find

By Abramo Bagnara · #8273 ·

Messages