|
Re: Zephyr sdks builds in jenkins?
Kumar,
This is currently being worked on. There is an issue with the host OS where the yocto build is not completing the build.
Anas
Kumar,
This is currently being worked on. There is an issue with the host OS where the yocto build is not completing the build.
Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#2938
·
|
|
Zephyr sdks builds in jenkins?
Are there continuous builds of the SDK in jenkins? Not seeing anything and was hoping to grab a “nightly” snapshot out of there.
- k
Are there continuous builds of the SDK in jenkins? Not seeing anything and was hoping to grab a “nightly” snapshot out of there.
- k
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#2937
·
|
|
Daily JIRA Digest
NEW JIRA items within last 24 hours: 0
UPDATED JIRA items within last 24 hours: 4
[ZEP-67] building a Zephyr app out of tree puts some files in wrong place
NEW JIRA items within last 24 hours: 0
UPDATED JIRA items within last 24 hours: 4
[ZEP-67] building a Zephyr app out of tree puts some files in wrong place
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2936
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1994 : sensors: add driver for DHTxx sensors
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1993 : drivers/nble: Add timeout before Conn Param
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1994 : sensors: add driver for DHTxx sensors
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1993 : drivers/nble: Add timeout before Conn Param
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2935
·
|
|
RFC: draft x86 interrupt documentation
I had a recent need to explain in detail the x86 IRQ implementation to
some colleagues working on Quark CPUs, and wrote this document.
Eventually I would like to clean this up, discuss other arches,
I had a recent need to explain in detail the x86 IRQ implementation to
some colleagues working on Quark CPUs, and wrote this document.
Eventually I would like to clean this up, discuss other arches,
|
By
Boie, Andrew P
·
#2934
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1971 : Bluetooth: L2CAP: Refactor l2cap_chan_get() in l2cap.c
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1951 : Bluetooth: L2CAP: Introduce
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1971 : Bluetooth: L2CAP: Refactor l2cap_chan_get() in l2cap.c
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1951 : Bluetooth: L2CAP: Introduce
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2933
·
|
|
Re: zephyr cc2520
Hi David,
Try to activate some debugging in the cc2520 driver first.
Set CONFIG_TI_CC2520_DEBUG=y in your projects conf file.
If that shows that network packets are not sent, then you can start
Hi David,
Try to activate some debugging in the cc2520 driver first.
Set CONFIG_TI_CC2520_DEBUG=y in your projects conf file.
If that shows that network packets are not sent, then you can start
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#2932
·
|
|
zephyr cc2520
Hi sir,
I am porting cc2520 driver to arduino_due board, when sending udp packet
over cc2520. the packet is never transmitted by cc2520 driver.
I don't know if cc2520 driver has run correctly on any
Hi sir,
I am porting cc2520 driver to arduino_due board, when sending udp packet
over cc2520. the packet is never transmitted by cc2520 driver.
I don't know if cc2520 driver has run correctly on any
|
By
david.dai@...
·
#2931
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] nanokernel: Add fiber_config structure and wrapper
Hi Vlad,
Not sure in what context you are taking this, the workqueue and work
should be 2 different objects, the workqueue object may or may not
carry its fiber_config depending if you want to share
Hi Vlad,
Not sure in what context you are taking this, the workqueue and work
should be 2 different objects, the workqueue object may or may not
carry its fiber_config depending if you want to share
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#2930
·
|
|
Daily JIRA Digest
NEW JIRA items within last 24 hours: 6
[ZEP-295] Consolidate and simplify GPIO driver configuration options
https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-295
[ZEP-294] Consolidate and simplify SPI
NEW JIRA items within last 24 hours: 6
[ZEP-295] Consolidate and simplify GPIO driver configuration options
https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-295
[ZEP-294] Consolidate and simplify SPI
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2929
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1949 : Bluetooth: Use tinycrypt for ecc in LE SC only sample
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1948 : Bluetooth: SMP: Reduce stack
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1949 : Bluetooth: Use tinycrypt for ecc in LE SC only sample
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1948 : Bluetooth: SMP: Reduce stack
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2928
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 2/4] nanokernel: Introduce workqueue API
I'll wait for your implementation before commenting more, but yes, the
only thing that I saw was similar between the two was that the fiber
could be shared, and of course, that means that both the
I'll wait for your implementation before commenting more, but yes, the
only thing that I saw was similar between the two was that the fiber
could be shared, and of course, that means that both the
|
By
Benjamin Walsh <benjamin.walsh@...>
·
#2927
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce workqueue API
I have posted another version of the patches on Gerrit. The only major
change is that I've added another test, as Luiz suggested.
I see architectural comments are rather favorable so I won't post
I have posted another version of the patches on Gerrit. The only major
change is that I've added another test, as Luiz suggested.
I see architectural comments are rather favorable so I won't post
|
By
Vlad Dogaru <vlad.dogaru@...>
·
#2926
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] nanokernel: Add fiber_config structure and wrapper
I'm not sure that helps in the bigger picture (although I admit I had
overlooked this possibility when I first asked you the question :]).
Consider the case where we have multiple instances of the
I'm not sure that helps in the bigger picture (although I admit I had
overlooked this possibility when I first asked you the question :]).
Consider the case where we have multiple instances of the
|
By
Vlad Dogaru <vlad.dogaru@...>
·
#2925
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 2/4] nanokernel: Introduce workqueue API
Hi Ben,
<benjamin.walsh(a)windriver.com> wrote:
Actually submitting work with a fifo is pretty similar, the delayed
version will probably only need a _nano_timeout and the workqueue
pointer so we can
Hi Ben,
<benjamin.walsh(a)windriver.com> wrote:
Actually submitting work with a fifo is pretty similar, the delayed
version will probably only need a _nano_timeout and the workqueue
pointer so we can
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#2924
·
|
|
Daily JIRA Digest
NEW JIRA items within last 24 hours: 1
[ZEP-291] Driver for the ENC28J60 ethernet device
https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-291
UPDATED JIRA items within last 24 hours: 0
CLOSED JIRA
NEW JIRA items within last 24 hours: 1
[ZEP-291] Driver for the ENC28J60 ethernet device
https://jira.zephyrproject.org/browse/ZEP-291
UPDATED JIRA items within last 24 hours: 0
CLOSED JIRA
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2923
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH 2/4] nanokernel: Introduce workqueue API
OK, but I don't think the two implementations will share much except the
system fiber that the callbacks will run in. There is not much that is
similar between your callout implementation and the
OK, but I don't think the two implementations will share much except the
system fiber that the callbacks will run in. There is not much that is
similar between your callout implementation and the
|
By
Benjamin Walsh <benjamin.walsh@...>
·
#2922
·
|
|
Daily Gerrit Digest
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1936 : doc: use table for Kconfig option reference
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1935 : Bluetooth: Fix NULL dereference
-
NEW within last 24 hours:
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1936 : doc: use table for Kconfig option reference
- https://gerrit.zephyrproject.org/r/1935 : Bluetooth: Fix NULL dereference
-
|
By
donotreply@...
·
#2921
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] nanokernel: Add fiber_config structure and wrapper
Hi Vlad,
Just have it in a super struct:
struct config {
struct fiber_config fg;
char __stack[STACK_SIZE];
}
I didn't say you have to change there, but it seems this is wrong
there as well
Hi Vlad,
Just have it in a super struct:
struct config {
struct fiber_config fg;
char __stack[STACK_SIZE];
}
I didn't say you have to change there, but it seems this is wrong
there as well
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#2920
·
|
|
Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] tests: Add nano_work test
Hi Vlad,
I guess it would be wise to add tests for submitting work from both
fiber and task, it appear this is only done for a task. Also it is
super important that submitting work from the handler
Hi Vlad,
I guess it would be wise to add tests for submitting work from both
fiber and task, it appear this is only done for a task. Also it is
super important that submitting work from the handler
|
By
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
·
#2919
·
|