devel@lists.zephyrproject.org

also look at include/misc/stack.h for Stack usage analysis helpers Anas

By Nashif, Anas · #2643 ·

Can you point me to the patch? I can't see it in the original email in the thread (save my email doing funky stuff :) Thanks

By Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky <inaky.perez-gonzalez@...> · #2642 ·

Re: Sanity check and test cases

That part is already in the kernel: CONFIG_INIT_STACKS fills the stacks with 0xaa when threads are initialized.

By Benjamin Walsh <benjamin.walsh@...> · #2641 ·

Re: Sanity check and test cases

Hey Yannis,

By Kalowsky, Daniel <daniel.kalowsky@...> · #2640 ·

Re: Sanity check and test cases

<maciek.borzecki(a)gmail.com> wrote: Now that I've seen the patch it got me thinking. What if we added an opt-in debug code for fiber/tasks that helped to measure stack usage? This could be something

By Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...> · #2639 ·

Re: RFC: extend sanitycheck testcase filtering expressiveness

I briefly considered this approach but after doing some reading concluded it was unsafe. http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201206/eval_really_is_dangerous.html Andrew

By Boie, Andrew P · #2638 ·

Re: Sanity check and test cases

Hi, <giannis.damigos(a)gmail.com> wrote: You can post the patch and add me for review. From what I've seen, there's ~10 tests that fail under sanitycheck with SRAM overflow from hundreds of bytes, to

By Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...> · #2637 ·

Re: FW: [users] TCP/IP support in network IP stack

Could MQTT-SN work for you?

By Paul Duffy <paduffy@...> · #2636 ·

Sanity check and test cases

Hi all, a quick question regarding sanity check and test cases. I modified the test-fifo test case reducing the amount of memory statically allocated for fibers' stack. This permits the test_nano to

By Yannis Damigos · #2635 ·

Re: FW: [users] TCP/IP support in network IP stack

Thanks a lot for the reply If TCP support to the network stack is provided then Can I use the MQTT client library to make support for MQTT ? Can you please tell me when can I expect the TCP support

By Mahendravarman rajarao <mahendravarman.rajarao@...> · #2634 ·

Re: RFC: extend sanitycheck testcase filtering expressiveness

QA test suite actually has similar requirement for test case filtering by expression. We took a lightweight approach, directly use "python expression" instead of creating a new one. The benefit of

By Wang, Jing J · #2633 ·

Re: FW: [users] TCP/IP support in network IP stack

wrote: Yes, TCP is not supported right now. Yes, I am currently working on adding TCP support to the network stack. Cheers, Jukka

By Jukka Rissanen · #2632 ·

k64 rgb-led kernel module

Hello everybody, I recently wanted to have a more fun with the k64 and wrote a little kernel module. I don't know, if it is needed for the real kernel and if the structure is right. But if anyone is

By Idupsle <idupsle@...> · #2631 ·

FW: [users] TCP/IP support in network IP stack

Hi Under Zephyr RTOS net/ip/net_core.c, Support for IPPROTO_UDP is available and Support for IPPROTO_TCP is mentioned as not yet supported Does it mean the Zephyr RTOS network stack has support only

By Mahendravarman Rajarao (RBEI/EAA3) <Mahendravarman.Rajarao@...> · #2630 ·

Re: RFC: extend sanitycheck testcase filtering expressiveness

Beside the issue above, the proposal looks good to me and will definitely improve and expand the coverage. Lets find a way to make this work without adding the parser into the tree

By Nashif, Anas · #2629 ·

Re: RFC: extend sanitycheck testcase filtering expressiveness

Yeah I'll take it out of the patch series. I've asked Juro to look into including it into the Zephyr SDK, which is where we typically put our dependent packages. If that doesn't work out we would just

By Boie, Andrew P · #2628 ·

Cortex-M0 porting status? (was: Re: Re: STM32F103x port)

Hi Anas, Any updates on the Cortex-M0 porting effort? Is there any public code (even WIP) to look at? Best Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo

By Anderson Lizardo <anderson.lizardo@...> · #2627 ·

Re: RFC: extend sanitycheck testcase filtering expressiveness

I see nothing bad in the proposal. I would refrain from copying PLY into the source tree for the following reasons: - Support. Updating the library, which is not the part of the project may be a

By Dmitriy Korovkin · #2626 ·

RFC: remove microkernel Task IRQs from Zephyr

Problem statement: The current implementation of Microkernel Task IRQs has a hard dependency on dynamic interrupts, which we also want to remove from Zephyr. Although the mechanism could be

By Boie, Andrew P · #2625 ·

Re: Help for tests/benchmark/latency_measure run failed on Arduino Due board.

Hi Rodger, You can first have a try without "TEST=max" option. Besides this, gdb can be used to debug this issue after disabled the other successful indicators. Regards Min

By Li, Min A <min.a.li@...> · #2624 ·

Messages