Hi folks: why there are two implmentations of schedule? What is the difference "z_reschedule_irqlock" and "z_reschedule“? why two

Hi all, Tomorrow we will discuss an RFC that is ready to be merged, two items that were raised in last week's TSC and we will check on progress with the GPIO porting. - RFC (ready to merge): on-off

As I know, currently there is no support of SMP for ARM architecture in Zephyr

See the section on “CPU Mask” for directions on how to constrain threads to run on a particular set of CPUs. https://docs.zephyrproject.org/latest/reference/kernel/smp/smp.html

HI folks: Did the SMP support arm architecture boards presents? if yes, which one? Thank you! 曹子龙 珠海全志科技股份有限公司

Hi folks: throught the docment of zephyr smp imple. a task take the irq_lock can be yield to another thread, but would restore the spinlock own status when it comes back but, throught the code, i

Hi folks: Did the SMP impl. of zephyr support the cpu affinity settings? i have not seen the related members in k_thread structure. Thanks for your kindly

As a follow up we plan on The Jan 30th Dev Review meeting to discuss Pinmux/DT. - k

[sorry for the late notice] Here’s the agenda topics for this week: * drivers: watchdog: Add SiLabs Gecko WDOG driver [ https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/20316 ] Any topics

Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting When: Thursday, 16 January 2020, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-08:00) America/Los Angeles Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203 An RSVP is requested. Click here to

Hi, I suggest checking the stack sizes. CONFIG_NO_OPTIMIZATIONS is sometimes used to decide which size to apply. Stack overflow could cause strange issues. You can enlarge stacks enable stack analysis

Hi Chris and All, I replied too quickly. CONFIG_NO_OPTIMIZATIONS=y only delays the point at which the program hangs. In my case it starts by displaying data and BLE advertising as

Thanks Chris. That works. And using zephyr_cc_option(-O0) with CONFIG_NO_OPTIMIZATIONS=y does not cause any trouble. Still seems strange that other program do not seem to bother!

Hi Ab, Have you tried using CONFIG_NO_OPTIMIZATIONS=y ? I've found that will achieve the same ends as explicitly changing CMakeLists.txt to use -O0.

Hi All, I had a program than ran with no problems in 1.13. But would crash in 1.14.99 if  zephyr_cc_option(-O0) is present in the CMakeLists.txt file. The program is based on the peripheral_esp

Hi there, Combining the Bluetooth Host from Nordic with the Zephyr Controller is not an option, because the SoftDevice is hardcoded to contain both Host and Controller and they cannot be

NFFS support will be removed from the zephyr-project codebase. It was decided to take such action as NFFS has few serious issue which made it unreliable (Such issues were not fixed since a long

Phil, I sent a PR which adds a test for this: https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/21920 It passes on all the emulated targets we have (including Cortex-M), but if this is

Interrupts should be unlocked when handling system calls, and indeed a thread in a system call can sleep or be preempted. Sounds like you have found a bug. And a gap in testing, we ought to have a

Hi Johan Thank you for your quick reply. Yes, as you mentioned and as I already understand, hci_uart is for separating the controller and host on different chips. In this situation, I need to run my