|
[PATCH 7/8] gpio: gpio_dw: Use generic suspend suspend/resume API
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie(a)intel.com>
Change-Id: I55c2c8132172e841214e53be76545b5c84ba1a3c
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie(a)intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio_dw.c | 26
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie(a)intel.com>
Change-Id: I55c2c8132172e841214e53be76545b5c84ba1a3c
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie(a)intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio_dw.c | 26
|
By
dirk.brandewie@...
·
#2384
·
|
|
[PATCH 8/8] gpio: gpio_dw: Add suport for device_register_pm_ops()
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie(a)intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib989e2a45b7c97728b79b4908d6d0aa8d0957999
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie(a)intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio_dw.c | 24
From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie(a)intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib989e2a45b7c97728b79b4908d6d0aa8d0957999
Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie(a)intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio_dw.c | 24
|
By
dirk.brandewie@...
·
#2385
·
|
|
Re: RFC[1/2] Common logging infrastructure and API
By
Kalowsky, Daniel <daniel.kalowsky@...>
·
#2364
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Counter driver API
On 02/29/2016 07:22 AM, D'alton, Alexandre wrote:
Please post in-line it makes it way easier to keep the context
right.
> There are 2 aon counters:
>
> Aon counter => monotinic counter without
On 02/29/2016 07:22 AM, D'alton, Alexandre wrote:
Please post in-line it makes it way easier to keep the context
right.
> There are 2 aon counters:
>
> Aon counter => monotinic counter without
|
By
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...>
·
#2365
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Counter driver API
Exactly !
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation SAS (French simplified joint stock company)
Registered headquarters: "Les Montalets"- 2, rue de
Exactly !
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation SAS (French simplified joint stock company)
Registered headquarters: "Les Montalets"- 2, rue de
|
By
D'alton, Alexandre <alexandre.dalton@...>
·
#2366
·
|
|
Re: RFC[1/2] Common logging infrastructure and API
Anas please fix you email client to set in-reply-to: correctly
so threading work correctly.
Agreed we need to have a common facility.
So the logging driver could bind to the appropriate
Anas please fix you email client to set in-reply-to: correctly
so threading work correctly.
Agreed we need to have a common facility.
So the logging driver could bind to the appropriate
|
By
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...>
·
#2367
·
|
|
Re: RFC[1/2] Common logging infrastructure and API
I agree this sounds awkward.
Why aren't the component themselves providing a kconfig option that can
be tweaked on a per-component
I agree this sounds awkward.
Why aren't the component themselves providing a kconfig option that can
be tweaked on a per-component
|
By
Benjamin Walsh <benjamin.walsh@...>
·
#2368
·
|
|
Re: RFC[1/2] Common logging infrastructure and API
+1 Said the same thing although not as well in my response you dan and I
must have been typing at the same time :-)
+1 Said the same thing although not as well in my response you dan and I
must have been typing at the same time :-)
|
By
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...>
·
#2369
·
|
|
Re: STM32F103x port
General feedback inline below.
General feedback inline below.
|
By
Kalowsky, Daniel <daniel.kalowsky@...>
·
#2370
·
|
|
Re: STM32F103x port
I think he got that from scs.h, which uses 'val' and 'bit'. Maybe we
should rename 'val' to 'raw' there as well.
I think he got that from scs.h, which uses 'val' and 'bit'. Maybe we
should rename 'val' to 'raw' there as well.
|
By
Benjamin Walsh <benjamin.walsh@...>
·
#2371
·
|
|
Re: STM32F103x port
Yes, I tried to be consistent with scs.h. I agree with Daniel, 'raw' is
more meaningful.
--
Maciek Borzecki
Yes, I tried to be consistent with scs.h. I agree with Daniel, 'raw' is
more meaningful.
--
Maciek Borzecki
|
By
Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...>
·
#2372
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Counter driver API
By
Tseng, Kuo-Lang
·
#2398
·
|
|
Re: RFC[1/2] Common logging infrastructure and API
+1
This sounds more scalable, basically removes the need for defining a domain and using the levels to do the selection of how verbose messages are for each domain.
Anas
>
+1
This sounds more scalable, basically removes the need for defining a domain and using the levels to do the selection of how verbose messages are for each domain.
Anas
>
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#2399
·
|
|
Re: STM32F103x port
Makes sense. I think we should also add another 'MCU family' level of
hierarchy. We would have then:
arch/
arm/
soc/
stm32/
stm32f1xx/
<soc specific>
stm32f2xx/
Makes sense. I think we should also add another 'MCU family' level of
hierarchy. We would have then:
arch/
arm/
soc/
stm32/
stm32f1xx/
<soc specific>
stm32f2xx/
|
By
Maciek Borzecki <maciek.borzecki@...>
·
#2400
·
|
|
Re: STM32F103x port
By
Kalowsky, Daniel <daniel.kalowsky@...>
·
#2401
·
|
|
Re: RFC - arm-gcc-embedded Toolchain Support
Hi Anas,
Can you please confirm if you want me to progress this RFC (since it's more
convenient to have the VARIANT set, rather than specifying CROSS_COMPILE
each time)? If so, what if any changes
Hi Anas,
Can you please confirm if you want me to progress this RFC (since it's more
convenient to have the VARIANT set, rather than specifying CROSS_COMPILE
each time)? If so, what if any changes
|
By
Hugo Vincent
·
#2402
·
|
|
[RFC] uart: add ISR callback mechanism for UART drivers
The peripherals utilizing UART were required to register their own
ISR rountines. This means that all those peripherals drivers need
to know which IRQ line is attached to a UART controller, and
The peripherals utilizing UART were required to register their own
ISR rountines. This means that all those peripherals drivers need
to know which IRQ line is attached to a UART controller, and
|
By
Daniel Leung <daniel.leung@...>
·
#2403
·
|
|
Re: RFC[1/2] Common logging infrastructure and API
Hello,
FYI, in thunderdome we have also created a log system solving some of the problems you mention in your RFC. Here are my 2 cents following our experience:
- In our implementation we now
Hello,
FYI, in thunderdome we have also created a log system solving some of the problems you mention in your RFC. Here are my 2 cents following our experience:
- In our implementation we now
|
By
Chereau, Fabien <fabien.chereau@...>
·
#2404
·
|
|
Re: RFC[1/2] Common logging infrastructure and API
Hi Fabien,
Very good point.
We also experienced it with networking drivers where debugging in the
middle or RX/TX just kills timing.
This would need to be addressed, but besides this log macros
Hi Fabien,
Very good point.
We also experienced it with networking drivers where debugging in the
middle or RX/TX just kills timing.
This would need to be addressed, but besides this log macros
|
By
Tomasz Bursztyka
·
#2405
·
|
|
Re: RFC - arm-gcc-embedded Toolchain Support
Hi Hugo,
Yes, please do submit.
Regards,
Anas
Hi Hugo,
Yes, please do submit.
Regards,
Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#2406
·
|