|
Re: [Zephyr-users] Network forum agenda
Hello,
"Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, appreciated!
Will there be any status update on TCP2? I see recently there're
multiple patches from
Hello,
"Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, appreciated!
Will there be any status update on TCP2? I see recently there're
multiple patches from
|
By
Paul Sokolovsky
·
#6919
·
|
|
Network forum agenda
Hi all,
There is a network forum meeting tomorrow 7 Apr at 8AM PDT / 17.00
Hi all,
There is a network forum meeting tomorrow 7 Apr at 8AM PDT / 17.00
|
By
Jukka Rissanen
·
#6918
·
|
|
Zephyr Toolchain Working Group Meeting – 2 April 2020
Hi, Today’smeeting minutes:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IQKBK-GcJNZG0O9QArqYfvb6Huk5xHscN-XIGEZr-z8/
Notes/Minutes
Status updates
Wayne: PR22668:
Metaware linker doesn’t have some
Hi, Today’smeeting minutes:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IQKBK-GcJNZG0O9QArqYfvb6Huk5xHscN-XIGEZr-z8/
Notes/Minutes
Status updates
Wayne: PR22668:
Metaware linker doesn’t have some
|
By
Rasmussen, Torsten
·
#6917
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting - Thu, 04/02/2020 8:00am-9:00am, Please RSVP
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting
When: Thursday, 2 April 2020, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting
When: Thursday, 2 April 2020, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#6916
·
|
|
Zephyr Toolchain Working Group - Thu, 04/02/2020
#cal-notice
Zephyr Toolchain Working Group
When:
Thursday, 2 April 2020
7:00am to 8:00am
(GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:
https://zoom.us/j/967549258
Description:
Zephyr Working Group is inviting you to
Zephyr Toolchain Working Group
When:
Thursday, 2 April 2020
7:00am to 8:00am
(GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:
https://zoom.us/j/967549258
Description:
Zephyr Working Group is inviting you to
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#6915
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Toolchain Working Group - Thu, 04/02/2020 7:00am-8:00am
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Toolchain Working Group
When: Thursday, 2 April 2020, 7:00am to 8:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/967549258
View Event
Organizer: Maureen
Reminder: Zephyr Toolchain Working Group
When: Thursday, 2 April 2020, 7:00am to 8:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/967549258
View Event
Organizer: Maureen
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#6914
·
|
|
Dev-Review Meeting Agenda Apr 2
Here’s the agenda topics for this week:
* Review PR’s tagged with dev-review
* Driver Model???
* Use of DTS Alias v Chosen for device selection
* Any topics anyone else has
- k
Here’s the agenda topics for this week:
* Review PR’s tagged with dev-review
* Driver Model???
* Use of DTS Alias v Chosen for device selection
* Any topics anyone else has
- k
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#6913
·
|
|
Zephyr Toolchain Working Group Meeting – 2 April 2020
Hi,
For today’s meeting let’s follow up on last meeting action items and get a status update.
Where:
https://zoom.us/j/967549258
Agenda
Updates:
Wayne: PR22668: Anything new
Hi,
For today’s meeting let’s follow up on last meeting action items and get a status update.
Where:
https://zoom.us/j/967549258
Agenda
Updates:
Wayne: PR22668: Anything new
|
By
Rasmussen, Torsten
·
#6912
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Project: APIs - Tue, 03/31/2020 9:00am-10:00am, Please RSVP
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs
When: Tuesday, 31 March 2020, 9:00am to 10:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/177647878
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs
When: Tuesday, 31 March 2020, 9:00am to 10:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/177647878
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#6911
·
|
|
Re: hci_usb example compatible with native Windows 10 BLE stack?
#hci
I see the same issue, I also suspect that Windows requires a dual-mode controller. See my comment here:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/23866#issuecomment-606690829
Carles
I see the same issue, I also suspect that Windows requires a dual-mode controller. See my comment here:
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/issues/23866#issuecomment-606690829
Carles
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#6910
·
|
|
Re: hci_usb example compatible with native Windows 10 BLE stack?
#hci
Hi Simon:
Which revision of Zephyr are you using? On Zephyr v2.1.0 I had no problems, but with Zephyr 2.2.0 I am having problems. I have filed a bug for
Hi Simon:
Which revision of Zephyr are you using? On Zephyr v2.1.0 I had no problems, but with Zephyr 2.2.0 I am having problems. I have filed a bug for
|
By
Lawrence King
·
#6909
·
|
|
API meeting: agenda
Hi all,
Note: Today we go back to our usual 9AM PDT / 18h CET.
Today's topics:
- Template to document a driver implementation: discussion as to what it should include
- API Terminology
Hi all,
Note: Today we go back to our usual 9AM PDT / 18h CET.
Today's topics:
- Template to document a driver implementation: discussion as to what it should include
- API Terminology
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#6908
·
|
|
hci_usb example compatible with native Windows 10 BLE stack?
#hci
Has anyone tested the hci_usb sample with windows 10 and its native BLE stack? On my end, it won't accept the controller. A reason might be that it lacks classic Bluetooth. can anyone confirm this,
Has anyone tested the hci_usb sample with windows 10 and its native BLE stack? On my end, it won't accept the controller. A reason might be that it lacks classic Bluetooth. can anyone confirm this,
|
By
Simon.Iversen@...
·
#6907
·
|
|
Re: Development Issue on LPC55S69
HI Vince,
There is no ‘official’ SPI specification, it is a defacto standard, and chip manufacturers can implement it any way they want. Generally most peripherals don’t care what level the
HI Vince,
There is no ‘official’ SPI specification, it is a defacto standard, and chip manufacturers can implement it any way they want. Generally most peripherals don’t care what level the
|
By
Lawrence King
·
#6906
·
|
|
Re: Development Issue on LPC55S69
Hi Lawrence,
Sorry for unclear description.
What I mean is the voltage of MOSI signal inidle state doesn’t remain in high voltage.
For example, the following picture shows it begin from high
Hi Lawrence,
Sorry for unclear description.
What I mean is the voltage of MOSI signal inidle state doesn’t remain in high voltage.
For example, the following picture shows it begin from high
|
By
Vince Wu (吳家瑋) <Vince.Wu@...>
·
#6905
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-announce] Zephyr CMake package / find_package(Zephyr)
You need to be inside a zephyr tree (or pointing to it with ZEPHYR_BASE) that has #23054 merged in, so the latest upstream master will do. zephyr-export is implemented in the zephyr tree, not in west
You need to be inside a zephyr tree (or pointing to it with ZEPHYR_BASE) that has #23054 merged in, so the latest upstream master will do. zephyr-export is implemented in the zephyr tree, not in west
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#6904
·
|
|
FW: Zephyr CMake package / find_package(Zephyr)
By
Carles Cufi
·
#6903
·
|
|
Re: [Zephyr-announce] Zephyr CMake package / find_package(Zephyr)
What version of west has 'zephyr-export’??
[galak@spiff zephyr]$ west -V
West version: v0.7.2
[galak@spiff zephyr]$ west zephyr-export
usage: west [-h] [-z ZEPHYR_BASE] [-v] [-V] <command>
What version of west has 'zephyr-export’??
[galak@spiff zephyr]$ west -V
West version: v0.7.2
[galak@spiff zephyr]$ west zephyr-export
usage: west [-h] [-z ZEPHYR_BASE] [-v] [-V] <command>
|
By
Kumar Gala
·
#6902
·
|
|
Re: Development Issue on LPC55S69
Hi Vince:
2) I am not sure what you mean when you say “the voltage on the MOSI signal is unstable”. The Oscilloscope traces below look fine, however, the probes on your oscilloscope have not
Hi Vince:
2) I am not sure what you mean when you say “the voltage on the MOSI signal is unstable”. The Oscilloscope traces below look fine, however, the probes on your oscilloscope have not
|
By
Lawrence King
·
#6901
·
|
|
Development Issue on LPC55S69
Hi,
We have some issues on developing LPC55S69 based on Zephyr OS.
1. EVB can’t run FW successfully if I do operation for double type variable.
I found the FW with this problem will
Hi,
We have some issues on developing LPC55S69 based on Zephyr OS.
1. EVB can’t run FW successfully if I do operation for double type variable.
I found the FW with this problem will
|
By
Vince Wu (吳家瑋) <Vince.Wu@...>
·
#6900
·
|