|
Re: Soft serial 9k6 for debugging on free GPIO?
Hi Martinj,
This Zephyr example does UART over GPIO:
https://github.com/NXPmicro/zephyr/tree/soft_periph/samples/soft_periph
Here's a picture with the system
Hi Martinj,
This Zephyr example does UART over GPIO:
https://github.com/NXPmicro/zephyr/tree/soft_periph/samples/soft_periph
Here's a picture with the system
|
By
Stanislav Pobořil
·
#6009
·
|
|
Re: Soft serial 9k6 for debugging on free GPIO?
Hi Martijn,
If you are using a Segger J-Link probe you can use the RAM-based RTT console by setting CONFIG_RTT_CONSOLE=y
See
Hi Martijn,
If you are using a Segger J-Link probe you can use the RAM-based RTT console by setting CONFIG_RTT_CONSOLE=y
See
|
By
Henrik Brix Andersen
·
#6008
·
|
|
Re: Soft serial 9k6 for debugging on free GPIO?
Hi Martijn,
Not sure about the exact situation you are facing, listed below please find some of the suggestions I can think of:
1. There are soft uart implementations on github, which you might be
Hi Martijn,
Not sure about the exact situation you are facing, listed below please find some of the suggestions I can think of:
1. There are soft uart implementations on github, which you might be
|
By
Jian Zhang
·
#6007
·
|
|
Soft serial 9k6 for debugging on free GPIO?
Hi there,
We have a prototype utilising the nRF52840 BME340 SoC module. Since we use a LoRaWAN module and a MAX3485 we used the two 840 uarts for connecting to these subsystems. But I do have some
Hi there,
We have a prototype utilising the nRF52840 BME340 SoC module. Since we use a LoRaWAN module and a MAX3485 we used the two 840 uarts for connecting to these subsystems. But I do have some
|
By
Martijn Smit
·
#6006
·
|
|
"net arp" command displays "ARP cache is empty" even after a series of arpings from peer devices
#nrf52840
Hi,
I have interfaced "ENC28J60" to "PCA10056"(NRF52840) through SPI. Made necessary configurations in order to reflect hardware changes in software. Flashed sample application, "dumb_http_server" to
Hi,
I have interfaced "ENC28J60" to "PCA10056"(NRF52840) through SPI. Made necessary configurations in order to reflect hardware changes in software. Flashed sample application, "dumb_http_server" to
|
By
giriprasad@...
·
#6005
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting - Thu, 05/30/2019 8:00am-9:00am, Please RSVP
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting
When: Thursday, 30 May 2019, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting
When: Thursday, 30 May 2019, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#6004
·
|
|
Where is the proper place to update the RPL HBHO
Hi all,
I am working on bring back RPL to Zephyr, which includes migrating RPL to use net_pkt API.
The old RPL implementation was using net_pkt_insert() to insert RPL HBHO header when finalizing
Hi all,
I am working on bring back RPL to Zephyr, which includes migrating RPL to use net_pkt API.
The old RPL implementation was using net_pkt_insert() to insert RPL HBHO header when finalizing
|
By
Jian Zhang
·
#6003
·
|
|
Re: Logging with a string via %s
Hi,
Logger is now able to detect lack of log_strdup() wrapping when %s is used with string coming from read write memory. Logger will assert if asserts are enabled or log error message if asserts are
Hi,
Logger is now able to detect lack of log_strdup() wrapping when %s is used with string coming from read write memory. Logger will assert if asserts are enabled or log error message if asserts are
|
By
Chruściński, Krzysztof
·
#6002
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Project: APIs - Tue, 05/28/2019 9:00am-10:00am, Please RSVP
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs
When: Tuesday, 28 May 2019, 9:00am to 10:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/177647878
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
Reminder: Zephyr Project: APIs
When: Tuesday, 28 May 2019, 9:00am to 10:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/177647878
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#6001
·
|
|
API meeting and agenda
Hi all,
As you know, the Zephyr API meeting takes place on Tuesdays 9AM-10AM (PDT) (18h-19h (CEST)).
Until now the way to include an item (issue or Pull Request) added to the meeting agenda was to
Hi all,
As you know, the Zephyr API meeting takes place on Tuesdays 9AM-10AM (PDT) (18h-19h (CEST)).
Until now the way to include an item (issue or Pull Request) added to the meeting agenda was to
|
By
Carles Cufi
·
#6000
·
|
|
CANopen support?
Hi all,
I am working on a project where we will need to use CANopen on top of the SocketCAN driver layer in Zephyr.
I have found two references to CANopen on Zephyr so far:
-
Hi all,
I am working on a project where we will need to use CANopen on top of the SocketCAN driver layer in Zephyr.
I have found two references to CANopen on Zephyr so far:
-
|
By
Henrik Brix Andersen
·
#5999
·
|
|
Re: Checking compiler support for userspace C, C++ libs (ZeroMQ)
Hi Ivan,
I have successfully tried Zephyr with C++ library (eRPC) some time ago.
The version of Zephyr was based on master branch as of March 19th.
However:
I haven't used zephyr-sdk, I used
Hi Ivan,
I have successfully tried Zephyr with C++ library (eRPC) some time ago.
The version of Zephyr was based on master branch as of March 19th.
However:
I haven't used zephyr-sdk, I used
|
By
Stanislav Pobořil
·
#5998
·
|
|
Re: Checking compiler support for userspace C, C++ libs (ZeroMQ)
Ivan,
I would suggest you to not use C++. I am facing a lot of compatibility issues and some drivers (like Bluetooth) will not work in C++.
C is the only truly viable option. Go for it. Zephyr in C
Ivan,
I would suggest you to not use C++. I am facing a lot of compatibility issues and some drivers (like Bluetooth) will not work in C++.
C is the only truly viable option. Go for it. Zephyr in C
|
By
Rodrigo Peixoto <rodrigopex@...>
·
#5997
·
|
|
Checking compiler support for userspace C, C++ libs (ZeroMQ)
Hello.
I was wondering how to investigate the state of things around incompatibility of the level of C++ support, required to compile these bindings for ZeroMQ:
http://zeromq.org/docs:core-api
.
But
Hello.
I was wondering how to investigate the state of things around incompatibility of the level of C++ support, required to compile these bindings for ZeroMQ:
http://zeromq.org/docs:core-api
.
But
|
By
Ivan Serdyuk
·
#5996
·
|
|
Upcoming Event: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting - Thu, 05/23/2019 8:00am-9:00am, Please RSVP
#cal-reminder
Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting
When: Thursday, 23 May 2019, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
Reminder: Zephyr Project: Dev Meeting
When: Thursday, 23 May 2019, 8:00am to 9:00am, (GMT-07:00) America/Los Angeles
Where:https://zoom.us/j/993312203
An RSVP is requested. Click here to
|
By
devel@lists.zephyrproject.org Calendar <devel@...>
·
#5995
·
|
|
Re: Moving external components out of the main tree
Hi,
The first HAL (QMSI) was removed from the tree and the west manifest has been updated. Please make sure you run `west update` to update your trees.
Anas
Hi,
The first HAL (QMSI) was removed from the tree and the west manifest has been updated. Please make sure you run `west update` to update your trees.
Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#5994
·
|
|
Moving external components out of the main tree
Hi,
Most of you already use the west tool for various things already, including building, flashing, signing and other common operations. One of the main reasons west was introduced was to support
Hi,
Most of you already use the west tool for various things already, including building, flashing, signing and other common operations. One of the main reasons west was introduced was to support
|
By
Nashif, Anas
·
#5993
·
|
|
Re: submitting contributions to Zephyr
That's coming! But that's the easy part. Making core Zephyr 64-bit clean
is the bulk of the work.
That's wonderful! Go figure why I didn't find it when looking exactly
for such a thing.
That's coming! But that's the easy part. Making core Zephyr 64-bit clean
is the bulk of the work.
That's wonderful! Go figure why I didn't find it when looking exactly
for such a thing.
|
By
Nicolas Pitre
·
#5992
·
|
|
Re: submitting contributions to Zephyr
Hi Nicholas!
I for one am definitely excited about a 64-bit RISC-V port of Zephyr!
You might be interested in this tool from GitHub called ‘hub’: https://hub.github.com/ It provides a command-line
Hi Nicholas!
I for one am definitely excited about a 64-bit RISC-V port of Zephyr!
You might be interested in this tool from GitHub called ‘hub’: https://hub.github.com/ It provides a command-line
|
By
Nathaniel Graff
·
#5991
·
|
|
submitting contributions to Zephyr
Hello,
This is my first post here, however it probably won't be the last.
For a while I've been working on making Zephyr to compile for and run on
64-bit targets. That currently works with the
Hello,
This is my first post here, however it probably won't be the last.
For a while I've been working on making Zephyr to compile for and run on
64-bit targets. That currently works with the
|
By
Nicolas Pitre
·
#5990
·
|