|
Zephyr 2.5.0-rc2 tagged
Hi, The second release candidate for Zephyr v2.5.0 has been tagged (v2.5.0-rc2). The merge window for features and enhancements remains closed until v2.5.0 is released. The next release milestone is c
Hi, The second release candidate for Zephyr v2.5.0 has been tagged (v2.5.0-rc2). The merge window for features and enhancements remains closed until v2.5.0 is released. The next release milestone is c
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7567
·
|
|
Zephyr 2.5.0-rc1 tagged
Hi, The first release candidate for Zephyr 2.5.0 has been tagged (v2.5.0-rc1). The merge window for features and enhancements is now closed for this release, and it will remain closed until 2.5.0 is r
Hi, The first release candidate for Zephyr 2.5.0 has been tagged (v2.5.0-rc1). The merge window for features and enhancements is now closed for this release, and it will remain closed until 2.5.0 is r
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7550
·
|
|
v2.5.0 merge window closes Friday, January 22nd
Hi, This is a reminder that the v2.5.0 merge window for new features closes this Friday, 22nd January. After that, only bug fixes and documentation will be merged until the final release is tagged, wh
Hi, This is a reminder that the v2.5.0 merge window for new features closes this Friday, 22nd January. After that, only bug fixes and documentation will be merged until the final release is tagged, wh
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7538
·
|
|
MAINTAINERS file and Pull-Request assignments
Hi, Based on various discussions and decisions made last year we introduced the MAINTAINERS file which serves as main place for documenting areas of the Zephyr code base and the respective maintainers
Hi, Based on various discussions and decisions made last year we introduced the MAINTAINERS file which serves as main place for documenting areas of the Zephyr code base and the respective maintainers
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7533
·
|
|
Community input on possible change to Discord from Slack
Jett, Zephyr project is not subscribed to any gsuite plans, free or paid. AFAIK we use google docs from LF in some areas. Maybe we should look into the non-profit “companies” option. Never heard of ch
Jett, Zephyr project is not subscribed to any gsuite plans, free or paid. AFAIK we use google docs from LF in some areas. Maybe we should look into the non-profit “companies” option. Never heard of ch
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7195
·
|
|
Community input on possible change to Discord from Slack
I am not saying IRC is a quality chat client, but the model works in that you can also chat without threads, and it has been done and is being done in many places already. I personally find threads an
I am not saying IRC is a quality chat client, but the model works in that you can also chat without threads, and it has been done and is being done in many places already. I personally find threads an
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7194
·
|
|
Community input on possible change to Discord from Slack
It depends who you ask, lots of people actually do not care or like threads the way they are implemented in Slack. This is basically a place where conversation just get buried. IRC did not have thread
It depends who you ask, lots of people actually do not care or like threads the way they are implemented in Slack. This is basically a place where conversation just get buried. IRC did not have thread
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7192
·
|
|
Post 2.3.0 PR merging
Hi, Here some data… What I have just posted on slack… So, go do some reviews please 😊 Thanks Anas From: <devel@...> on behalf of Carles Cufi <carles.cufi@...> Date: Tuesd
Hi, Here some data… What I have just posted on slack… So, go do some reviews please 😊 Thanks Anas From: <devel@...> on behalf of Carles Cufi <carles.cufi@...> Date: Tuesd
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7151
·
|
|
[Zephyr-users] [Zephyr-devel] Post 2.3.0 PR merging
Agreed. Those who can merge, should take 2 approvals and all other checks as a sign that it is ready to merge, no need for the approval of the person who merges, although a 3rd approval might give the
Agreed. Those who can merge, should take 2 approvals and all other checks as a sign that it is ready to merge, no need for the approval of the person who merges, although a 3rd approval might give the
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #7145
·
|
|
I2c read/write command?
Simon, The i2c shell was introduced just recently and scan was the first command, I had a prototype for write_byte and read_byte back then but never got to complete it, see https://github.com/nashif/z
Simon, The i2c shell was introduced just recently and scan was the first command, I had a prototype for write_byte and read_byte back then but never got to complete it, see https://github.com/nashif/z
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6972
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.14.2 Released
Hi, We are excited to announce the release of Zephyr 1.14.2, the second maintenance release of Zephyr 1.14 (LTS). This release comes 1 year after 1.14.0 was released. This is primarily a bug fix relea
Hi, We are excited to announce the release of Zephyr 1.14.2, the second maintenance release of Zephyr 1.14 (LTS). This release comes 1 year after 1.14.0 was released. This is primarily a bug fix relea
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6945
·
|
|
[Zephyr-users] SDK 0.11.1 Release
Hi, Thanks Kumar. Please note that this version of the SDK is now required for development on master and is enabled in CI. Anas On 03/02/2020, 05:56, "users@... on behalf of Kumar
Hi, Thanks Kumar. Please note that this version of the SDK is now required for development on master and is enabled in CI. Anas On 03/02/2020, 05:56, "users@... on behalf of Kumar
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6718
·
|
|
FW: [platformio/platformio-core] ZephyrProject integration (#1613)
Hi, Please try and give feedback directly in the github issue. Anas From: Ivan Kravets <notifications@...> Reply to: platformio/platformio-core <reply+AABL6MJFWZJEWCBOTKRR2TF33W3VNEVBNHHBGJB67E
Hi, Please try and give feedback directly in the github issue. Anas From: Ivan Kravets <notifications@...> Reply to: platformio/platformio-core <reply+AABL6MJFWZJEWCBOTKRR2TF33W3VNEVBNHHBGJB67E
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6478
·
|
|
major sanitycheck changes merged
A complete overhaul of the sanitycheck script and how we build and run tests. This new version of sanitycheck uses python for job distribution and drops use of Make. In addition to the move to python
A complete overhaul of the sanitycheck script and how we build and run tests. This new version of sanitycheck uses python for job distribution and drops use of Make. In addition to the move to python
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6386
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.14.1 tagged
The 1.14.1 docs are here: https://docs.zephyrproject.org/1.14.1/ We still need to update the indexes everywhere to point to the new dot release. David, where should this be changed? (show 1.14.1 inste
The 1.14.1 docs are here: https://docs.zephyrproject.org/1.14.1/ We still need to update the indexes everywhere to point to the new dot release. David, where should this be changed? (show 1.14.1 inste
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6370
·
|
|
Zephyr 1.14.1 tagged
Hi, We are pleased to announce that we have tagged the first 1.14 maintenance release with fixes, as well as Bluetooth qualification listings for the Bluetooth protocol stack included in Zephyr. All d
Hi, We are pleased to announce that we have tagged the first 1.14 maintenance release with fixes, as well as Bluetooth qualification listings for the Bluetooth protocol stack included in Zephyr. All d
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6364
·
|
|
What branch should I be using for the 1.14 LTS release?
v1.14-branch is the branch, all others are tags on the branch. Anas From: <devel@...> on behalf of Manu R <manu@...> Date: Friday, 23 August 2019 at 18:38 To: "d
v1.14-branch is the branch, all others are tags on the branch. Anas From: <devel@...> on behalf of Manu R <manu@...> Date: Friday, 23 August 2019 at 18:38 To: "d
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6197
·
|
|
Zephyr kernel compatibility with POSIX standard
Gabrielle, Right now Zephyr only supports a subset of the POSIX embedded profile (PSE52). It will depend on your application needs and the level of POSIX support your application depends on. Anas From
Gabrielle, Right now Zephyr only supports a subset of the POSIX embedded profile (PSE52). It will depend on your application needs and the level of POSIX support your application depends on. Anas From
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #6087
·
|
|
Moving external components out of the main tree
Hi, The first HAL (QMSI) was removed from the tree and the west manifest has been updated. Please make sure you run `west update` to update your trees. Anas
Hi, The first HAL (QMSI) was removed from the tree and the west manifest has been updated. Please make sure you run `west update` to update your trees. Anas
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #5994
·
|
|
Moving external components out of the main tree
Hi, Most of you already use the west tool for various things already, including building, flashing, signing and other common operations. One of the main reasons west was introduced was to support buil
Hi, Most of you already use the west tool for various things already, including building, flashing, signing and other common operations. One of the main reasons west was introduced was to support buil
|
By
Nashif, Anas
· #5993
·
|