"Alberto Escolar Piedras (ALPI)" <ALPI@...> wrote: Well, I was on vacation for two weeks before Apr 15. It definitely worked before that. And I saw first problematic case last week, after retur

Hello, As was noticed in a few (multiple?) PRs, automatic reviewer assignment based on the CODEOWNERS file no longer works as expected, specifically fails to assign reviewers. A recent example of this

Hello Nicholas, On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:02:46 +0000 " via Lists.Zephyrproject.Org" <Nicholas.Yameen=se.com@...> wrote: Zephyr offers a (sizable subset of) BSD Socket API, which mean

Hello Stefan, "Stefan Jaritz" <stefan@...> wrote: [] Recently, a new "async" UART API was added to Zephyr, whose implementation could leverage DMA support (that was one of usecases for this

Hello, "Paul Sokolovsky" <paul.sokolovsky@...> wrote: Ping @nashif. Btw, nice upgrade in size comparing to "non-NG" SDK - from 300MB to 700MB. No chance that we just fix up the old SDK? ;-)

Hello Anas, Do we make Zephyr 1.14 release with the stable 0.9.5 SDK? "Nashif, Anas" <anas.nashif@...> wrote: []

Hello Dave, "Dave Marples" <dave@...> wrote: Thanks for this post. The best suggestion I however would have is to look it up in the mailing list archive and link from the Github pull request.

Hello Kumar, "Kumar Gala" <kumar.gala@...> wrote: So, did the freeze officially happen on last Friday? What next steps can we expect? []

Hello Alberto, "Alberto Escolar Piedras (ALPI)" <ALPI@...> wrote: D'oh, I stand corrected. Now I remember it, Bluetooth simulation support, right? []

Hello Andrei, "Andrei Gansari" <andrei.gansari@...> wrote: We want to have a "random generator" device be present in Zephyr setup, which various subsystems then can use (instead of failing). So, T

Hello, "Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote: +1 for deprecation, -1 for removal in 1.14. 1.14 is supposed to be LTS release, and we shouldn't leave users who used prior versions of

"Flavio Ceolin" <flavio.ceolin@...> wrote: Anonymous unions are important part of the C language. An obvious solution to the problem is switching to the C11 standard. []

Hello Jukka, "Jukka Rissanen" <jukka.rissanen@...> wrote: Well, I kinda was interested in this, given all my criticism of the older API and implementation. But I'm in reservations after th

Hello Deepa, deepa.gopinath@... wrote: None of the links you mention has occurrence of "lwip" (case insensitive) in any material it points to. Zephyr doesn't work with lwIP, it has own

#nrf52840 #lwip #openthread

Hello Andrew, I appreciate the response. "Boie, Andrew P" <andrew.p.boie@...> wrote: Yes, and actually, over the couple of years, I found that information to become more usable. Like, I remember

Hello Kristoffer, As a quick reply, definitely ack on the problem statement. I can say more, I'm patiently waiting for a paradise times when on CPU exception, assert, etc., we'll be ending up in debug

Hello Deepa, deepa.gopinath@... wrote: Where did you find it? Do you have any links/etc.?

#nrf52840 #lwip #openthread

"Cufi, Carles" <Carles.Cufi@...> wrote: [] Great to know, you must be <...> then ;-) (Well, nick is skipped for privacy reasons). Right, and besides that "potentially pointless" situation (o

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:58:22 +0000 Marti Bolivar <marti@...> wrote: [] > > > Slack is a proprietary de facto standard in this context, at > > > least in the west. > > > > Love that argument.

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 20:11:04 +0000 "Marti Bolivar" <marti@...> wrote: [] > Slack is a proprietary de facto standard in this context, at least in > the west. Love that argument. So, perhaps we